Jump to content


Corporate takeovers of ballet companies?


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 12:14 PM

Something new to worry about? Or a possible salvation?

In a news search today, I found an article about an Australian corporate director who's urging his government to make some Australian companies, including opera and ballet, to remain owned by Australian nationals.

[quote]The federal Treasurer, Peter Costello, rejected Shell's bid for Woodside in April last year on national-interest grounds. Goode says it is part of the national identity to have some large companies that operate internationally, are more attuned to their local environment than foreign companies, and provide employment for talented people who do not want to move overseas to advance their careers. "We support the establishment and maintenance of Australian organisations in the arts, with the Australian Opera and the Australian Ballet, and in sport, with the Australian Institute of Sport," he says. "I think there is a case for maintaining Australian ownership of a limited number of important companies.

read article


I'd never thought of the possibility of, say, McDonalds (much less a non-American company) wanting to buy, say, ABT or New York City Ballet. Think of the possibilities!

#2 Calliope

Calliope

    Gold Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 805 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 05:30 PM

The possibilities scare me. I've thought about this one and considering the boards of most of these companies are already "big shots" at corporations.
Ballet companies already rely on major corporations for funding and sometimes that doesn't work out (Houston Ballet and Enron).
The thought of seeing ABT on the stock exchange though...
The topic beckons the question of the Artistic Director's job.
I think, and someone please correct me if I'm wrong, that SFB is the only company that lists a CEO in their company.

#3 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 06:00 PM

I hadn't thought about the significance of the CEO title. Wasn't Jeffrey Babcock CEO of Boston Ballet? (I'm not sure, but I think so.)

Luckily, ballet companies don't make a profit! Otherwise, they certainly would be on the stock exchange.

#4 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Emeralds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,641 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 06:13 PM

you remember correctly about babcock, alexandra!

#5 Calliope

Calliope

    Gold Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 805 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 07:30 PM

The Kennedy Center used to have a program that Michael Kaiser developed where they gave artists "CEO" type training. I don't know if it's still in existence, but...
Do many companies NOT make a profit? I know NYCB and ABT both ran black and I thought Helgi had turned SFB around.

#6 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 08:04 PM

Calliope, I think the Kennedy Center program is in its first year, so too early to see results. On making a profit, I think you're right that there are companies that are in the black, but since so much of their income is from fundraising, not income from sales, I don't think they would be profitable to a corporation with shareholders.

#7 BW

BW

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,048 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 08:30 PM

Ugh, can you imagine seeing the golden arches emblazened across the curtains at The NY State Theater? Of one of ABT's prima ballerinas turning out just a tiny bit more so as to show the audience the corporation's logo on the sole of her pointe shoe?! Yuck.

All joking aside the article is an interesting one... Does a Japanese company still own Radio City Music Hall? They did at one time didn't they? or was it just all the buildings around Rockefeller Center? Not that I'm against foreign investment but Mr. Costello does have a point about national identity.

However the part of the article that really caught my eye was at the very end: [quote]Goode says the boards of not-for-profit organisations are not very different from the boards of companies: both have to focus on strategy, new technology, and attracting and retaining highly skilled staff. "It is helpful for (not-for-profit organisations) to have a business person on the board and it helps the business people understand that a number of people live their lives in a very productive and hard-working way that is not driven by monetary rewards," he says. "You meet some very fine people, with quite different philosophies of life."

[ February 24, 2002: Message edited by: BW ]



#8 Manhattnik

Manhattnik

    Gold Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 09:16 PM

Yeah, I can see the endorsement possibilities for McDonald's from owning a ballet company.

"Hi, I'm Suzzy Skinnikins, and when I'm in the mood for something delicious, I like nothing better than to think really, really hard about a Big Mac."

#9 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 09:23 PM

Suzzy S can pig out on salad shakers, Manhattnik. Where's your sense of fun? Think of the Grand Ballet of the French Fries!

#10 Manhattnik

Manhattnik

    Gold Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 24 February 2002 - 09:25 PM

Who needs Drosselmeyer when you can have Ronald?

Come to think of it, Ronald was on hand for Misha's debut with NYCB, back when....

#11 mussel

mussel

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 406 posts

Posted 25 February 2002 - 12:28 AM

It's an impossibility. First, why would any corporations want to take over a money losing enterprise? ABT, NYCB, MoMA, the 2 Mets or any other cultural institutions have budget surplus because of government supports, private and corporate donations. They won't make money by selling tickets alone. Why would any corporations want to divert their resourses to tend such institutions? Shareholder watch groups, institutional investors and Wall Street analysts would have a lot to say for not minding their own money-making business. Philip Morris, a major contributor to ABT, has annual revenue of $80 billion. Why would it bother to take over an institutions that only generate millions?

Second, there are totally different set of government and IRS rules to govern non-profit organizations. In the NY State, all non-profit organizations are techically owned by the State. The artistic or executive directors run and set the direction of the organizations, the boards of trustees oversee the running. They don't issue shares of the institutions anyone could buy and own. Non-profit organizations can merge, subject to the State's approval like the proposed merger between WNET and WLIW, 2 NY area PBS stations. But there's no and there will be no precedent of corporations taking over a non-profit organization. The possibility of a corporation to take over Columbia or NYU for their huge endowments or any other purposes simply doesn't exist. However, a corporation can start and fund a non-profit organization with a totally independent personnel and board of trustees like the automobile musuem set up by Ford.

The possibility of seeing a corporate logo attached to State Theater is very remote. State Theater is owned by the City of New York, nothing can be done to the building without the City's permission. Selling naming rights may be an entirely different matter. There's a proposal from the Bloomberg administration of selling naming rights of city parks to corporations to fund the parks operations. But so far, I haven't come across any non-profit cultural institutions or their buildings named after corporations. Stadiums, ball parks and Broadway theaters, yes, but they're for profits. Imagine the Citigroup Metropolitan Opera House!!

I think what the Australian corporate director's trying to say is Australian corporations are as much as an national institution as Australian Ballet and Opera or some sport teams. Therefore, foreign ownerships to Australian companies should be restricted. I'd like to argue this point but it's beyond the scope of this broad.

[ February 25, 2002: Message edited by: mussel ]



#12 Mel Johnson

Mel Johnson

    Diamonds Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,311 posts

Posted 25 February 2002 - 07:25 AM

Well, there's always the Mafia. And company discipline would become no problem at all! wink.gif

#13 liebs

liebs

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 493 posts

Posted 25 February 2002 - 08:47 AM

Mussel, just for the record, the Roundabout Theatre's new building is nmaed the American Airlines Theatre. It is on Broadway but is owned or perhaps controlled on a long term lease by a not-for-profit theatre co.

#14 mussel

mussel

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 406 posts

Posted 26 February 2002 - 02:06 AM

I was thinking along the line of traditional opera houses and symphony halls. Roundabout Theater tries to accommondate plays that don't have too much appeal.

The newly opened Kimmel Performaning Arts Center comes pretty close where the main hall is named Verizon Hall and that's where Philly Symphony new home is.

I guess it's easier to sell naming rights of new buildings than old ones where there're lots of history, tradition and resistance to change attached to them.

#15 Calliope

Calliope

    Gold Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 805 posts

Posted 26 February 2002 - 05:49 AM

Roundabout Theater tries to accommondate plays that don't have too much appeal.


I'd disagree with that, they're re-staging of "The Women" was fantastic and sold out completely.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):