Figure Skating Competitions...the artistic side
#1
Posted 11 January 2002 - 12:10 PM
In Russia, figure skating is most definitely accorded equal status with ballet...you can't love one without loving the other. The Protopopovs are Russia's answer to 'Margot and Rudi' and so on.
So...how about kicking off a pre-Winter Olympics discussion on dancers-on-ice? Who, in your opinion, are the artists on ice of the present? Is the state of the 'fine art of figure skating' (as Dick Button often calls it) going to pot because of the emphasis on quad jumps...or are there a few true artists yet to be found out there?
I'll get this started:
I see a lot of artists, despite the emphasis on 'quad' jumps. Americans could tune into the finals of the Senior men at the US Nationals last night on ABC. [Tonight it will be Senior Ladies short programs on ESPN & tomorrow are LIVE finals of Senior Ladies on the ABC-Family cable channel starting at 8 pm EST for three hours, to be repeated on ABC on Sunday afternoon at, I think, 2 pm EST. Check you regional TV schedules for exact times.] Getting back to last night's Sr men's finals....did you notice how the one man who captured the hearts of the audience & truly skated WITH the music -- Todd Eldredge -- won the Sr men's title *despite* his lack of a quadruple jump? He beat the reigning titlist, Tim Goebel (a.k.a. 'Quad King'), who gave, IMO, a lackluster and mechanical rendition of 'An American in Paris' despite landing two of his three planned quads. There is huge debate this morning on the various skating websites about whether Todd or Tim deserved the title.
On another level, there is even bigger debate as to whether or not the bronze medalist last night -- Washington, DC's Michael Weiss, with (to me) a beautifully choreographed & artistically-delivered program to Puccini melodies -- deserved to make the Olympic team above the somewhat-clutzy Matt Savoie or the floating-but-lightweight Johnny Weir, who ended in 5th and 4th place, respectively. [Weir, IMO, is a true artist; at 17, he has time to develop some 'oomph' to his style. I really like him.]
Ladies preview: Ballet fans should look out for Sasha Cohen, currently in 2nd place, ahead of world bronze medalist Sarah Hughes (Dancemagazines's selected one). Sasha is, IMO, a true ballerina-on-ice; she hits exquisite positions in her spirals! [I'm only a bit miffed that she -- of all people -- is trying to become the first woman to land a quad. Come on Sasha - you don't need it!!! You are an artist.] Only reigning US & World gold medalist Michele Kwan stands ahead of Sasha at this point. Also be on the look-out for current-4th-place Angela Nikodinov, who has gained a very balletic style since working with the late Elena Tcherkasskaia. Angela's long program will be GISELLE. Michele is skating an LP to SCHEHERAZADE. Sasha Cohen will be CARMEN (in the Schedrin ballet version, I believe). Sarah Hughes is the only top lady not skating to ballet music; she is skating her LP to a Rachmaninoff orchestral medley I think....she skated to DON Q last year.] Some exciting TV viewing coming up this weekend.
Calling all ballet-and-skating fans. Opinions, please!
- Jeannie Szoradi
[ January 11, 2002: Message edited by: Jeannie ]
#2
Posted 11 January 2002 - 12:22 PM
Todd Eldgridge is certainly the most accomplished US male skater and right up there with the two Russian men in my opinion, with the exception of jumping ability. But he's his own worst enemy. I can't bear to watch him in major int'l competitions any longer - he finds a lot of ways to defeat himself. Of the two Russians, I'm hoping Alexei Yagudin will be the winner. His routines are powerful, well-choreographed, and his costumes are sophisticated rather than gaudy and cheap-looking. He's strong in every area that counts in figure skating.
#3
Posted 11 January 2002 - 12:43 PM
You might also want to keep an eye on Japan's Takeshi Honda, who is one of the most artistic men around; I sure hope that he can get his jumps together in Salt Lake (so that he not be buried in 17th place after the short program).
[ January 11, 2002: Message edited by: Jeannie ]
#4
Posted 11 January 2002 - 01:33 PM
I've been more than the disappointed in the progress of Plushenko. He has wonderful presentation and isn't afraid to be lyrical. Back in 2000, I would have thought he was the most 'balletic' of the men's field. But he sure is making it hard to see with his skating these days! He hides his best qualities with over- gesturing. I think his Michael Jackson number is way too overdone. But I guess the contrast to Yagudin does make things more fun.
Goebel has improved in leaps and bounds - he was into some serious shoulder-slumping when he first came on the scene. I used to shout that the boy needed a ballet class or a hundred!
And good ol' Todd - he's has he best lines, positions and spins out of all of them. I just think something's gone a little awry in his choice of music - nearly always movie soundtracks! I think Michelle has the same kind of problem - trying to be original by picking unusual and unfamiliar pieces of music and it hasn't really worked. I wish the two would skate to something more proven and powerful because then they'd be near unstoppable. Maybe that'd be taking the easy way out. But I look at the pairs team Sale and Pelletier skating to one of the most loved and romantic and over-used pieces of all time (Rachmaninoff) and still looking so incredibly fresh and original.
[ January 11, 2002: Message edited by: sylvia ]
#5
Posted 11 January 2002 - 01:48 PM
#6
Posted 11 January 2002 - 02:08 PM
I've heard the talk about S&P scrapping Orchid for Love Story. I hope that's not the case. I adore Love Story but Orchid has a much maturer feel and from artistic or presentational point of view I don't think it any less than Love Story.
I'm also rather intrigued by some of the discussion I've seen on incorporating romance and passion into programs to score higher presentation marks. I haven't seen B&S's new LP myself but I've seen talk that it has a much more romantic feel than we're used to seeing in them. That and the comment Sikharulidze made -"now we have to kiss to win"! And I've seen it in Shen and Zhao as well (who's presentation marks are now much higher!) I hate to think that pairs are incorporating this into their programs to boost their presentation marks. S&P are more than that - they're lifts are the most exquisite I've ever seen. Gordeeva and Grinkov conveyed passion in their skating without being overt, their Moonlight Sonata being the best example. I had hoped B&S would do the same.
[ January 11, 2002: Message edited by: sylvia ]
#7
Posted 11 January 2002 - 02:23 PM
Re: choice of music. While I agree that you can skate an exciting program to familiar music, I don't think that any skater who tries skating to something that requires a subtler relation between music and movement than we often see should be encouraged and rewarded for doing so. (In other words, all skaters currently doing a "Don Quixote" program will be allowed to continue, but anyone who creates a new one may be shot on sight. I'm also starting to feel the same way about "Meditation" from Thäis.)
#8
Posted 11 January 2002 - 04:10 PM
I agree, Sylvia -- nobody needs to get overtly sexy to convey romance, not that B/S's 'Thais' does this. I wasn't aware of Anton's comment of the kiss, by the way. Good grief!
Back to the familiar-vs-unfamiliar music, dirac et al. Dick Button was right, in that Johnny Weir's LP music, last night, was too remote..it didn't have a beginning, middle & end. There's lots of unfamiliar music with highlights, crescendi & such. Weir may have been hindered by his monochromatic music. *In last season's Grand prix Finals, Michele Kwan skated to one of the most ineffective pieces of music imaginable for this sort of competition: Bartok's 'Miraculous Mandarin.' Someone gave her the message &, thank goodness, she never tried it again! My point it: there's nothing wrong with skating to unfamiliar music -- we don't need an endless parade of Carmens, Don Qs, and Gladiators -- but it should be carefully selected so that it appeal to a general audience...not to mention those 'nine grey men & women' sitting in the jury box! They tend to be rather conservative & love the traditional stuff, after all.
re. Tim Goebel last night. Good grief - Lori Nichols (his choreographer) should tell him to stop doing that 'dumbo look' at the start of the 'American in Paris' program. I've seen it three times now and, I swear, it appears as if he is looking around for the nearest bathroom! I finally realized, last night, that the looking around with glazed eyes & open mouth was part of the choreography. It's especially funny because it occurs just before his music commences...so it looks as if there is a problem that needs to be rectified before he begins to skate. Kill it!
[ January 11, 2002: Message edited by: Jeannie ]
#9
Posted 11 January 2002 - 06:19 PM
#10
Posted 11 January 2002 - 07:20 PM
The men's event last night disappointed me overall-not a good sign for medal chances in SLC. Todd Eldredge deserved to win last night, but that kind of performance will not win an Olympic medal. The quad is essentially a requirement to make it on the podium and the international judges have made it clear this season that they will give the edge to Goebel when he lands the quads.
I also find Eldredge a bit bland-all the programs and costumes seem pretty much the same. Great spins and line, but his program doesn't jump out at me.
Goebel is definately capable of a much better performace than he gave last night. He looked tired and/or nervous last night. I suspect he was more focused on making the Olympic team, and was playing it a bit too safe. BTW, he landed just one quad (quad salchow-triple toe). The 4-toe he fell on, and the 2nd 4salchow he omitted.
Goebel would have easily led the SP had he not fallen on his spiral sequence, BTW and a second quad in the LP may have given him the national title. His tech marks were better than Eldredge, and the presentation marks not that much lower.
Weiss was way overmaked in both the SP and LP-international judges would have been much more severe in the SP deductions (they aren't trying to keep someone in contention for an olympic spot). If he skates like that in the Olympics, he will find himself too far down after the SP to even think of getting a medal. A two-footed quad and two touchdowns in a LP won't get you anywhere near a medal either. He may have better presentation than some of the men, but I don't find his chereography that interesting-and it doesn't matter anyway if he can't do the jumps.
Savoie's "clunkiness" got him to the Grand Prix final two years ago, so the judges obvious don't think it's an issue. He certainly deserved 3rd in the SP, and I would have preferred him to mak the Olympic team. IMHO, Weiss has had his chance and is not producing. I think Savoie's chances at the Olympics are just as good, and Savoie is the future.
I skate at the same rinks as Johnny Weir and know his coach, and he a very special skater. Not only is he just 17, but he didn't even start skating until he was 12. He landed his first axel one week after beginning skating lessons.
You really have to see his skating in person to appreciate it-he just floats over the ice and his spin positions are wonderful. I have to agree that his LP this year is not a good choice-though I believe that had he not had so many injury problems, the program would have been worked on a lot more. BTW, I suspect he is still feeling the effects of a stress fracture in his foot/leg. He has landed quads, but is not attempting them now because of the stress fracture. His future is bright-can't wait to see how he progresses before 2006!
Kate (who is sore after two sessions at the rink today)
#11
Posted 11 January 2002 - 10:24 PM
I'm surprised nobody's yet mentioned the exquisite Swiss skater, Lucinda Ruhe (sp?). She turned professional a year or two ago because she didn't have the jumps of Slutskaya or Kwan. But her spinning ability is breathtaking. Her speed, artistry, inventiveness and ability to remain in one spot on the ice during her very difficult spins is incomparable. I urge all skating fans here to watch Lucinda Ruhe at the first opportunity.
#12
Posted 11 January 2002 - 11:13 PM
#13
Posted 12 January 2002 - 06:58 AM
Sasha Cohen did not disappoint. And I adore the line & fluidity of Angela Nikodenov. Jenny Kirk, who trained seriously in Boston Ballet Academy during the ages of 9-to-14, also has exquisite line...and Ann-Patrice McDonough...and tiny Beatrisa Liang?? Well, Michele Kwan -- who was quite powerful & moving -- will be looking back tonight.
My only small complaint among the top women skaters is the slight gawkiness in the highly-touted Sarah Hughes. Don't get me wrong - Sarah is a very accomplished skater with powerful jumps + long lines..but there is a certain gawky quality to her skating. Just look at some of the bizarre positions that she hits in her footwork sequence. Maybe that's where my years of watching ballet kicks in & I can tell the difference. I'm sure that most of you did, too. [Sarah, by the way, actually beat the two women who are heavily-favored-for-gold at Olympics, when she defeated Irina Slutskaya & Michelle Kwan at Skate Canada, this past fall. So, obviously, Sarah is doing many things right. But her positions & general all-arms-and-all-legs gawkiness bother me.]
#14
Posted 12 January 2002 - 11:46 PM
I am not a skating aficionado by any means, yet I couldn't help but be glad for Michelle Kwan - I guess I always like it when someone who's been competeing for the longer time wins...and the fact that she chose to do it without her longtime coach was pretty inspiring too.
No question that Sasha Cohen is terrific for all the reasons you all have cited, and I felt really badly for Nikodinov(sp?) - I happen to think her ballet moves were beautiful - her upper body and arms were obviously Bolshoi inspired...
However, oddly enough, I really am very taken with Sarah Hughes - even though I do see a bit of that "gawkiness" that you refer to Jeannie...I can't help it but I think she's refreshing to watch. She may not be so completely "finished" as some of the others but to me her natural enjoyment is a major plus...She's only 16 but there is something special about her in my eyes...we shall see.
They all did very well and I enjoyed watching!
#15
Posted 13 January 2002 - 01:32 AM
Just wanted to address the comments about Sarah Hughes: I have the same problem with her skating as mentioned by Jeannie. I've been trying to figure out what, exactly, it is. She's certainly improving practically minute by minute. I THINK what seems off to me lies in how her upper and lower body aren't quite working in tandem, but I'm not sure. They don't seem to work smoothly together all the time. Taken in isolation, one could say her positions are excellent but put both halves together and there's still a slight disjointedness. I'm not completely positive that's what it is and would love it if someone else better versed in ballet can explain it to me. I've been trying to figure out for some time exactly what it is that I don't like about Hughes's skating, esp. because I'm usually in complete agreement with Dick Button. And he adores her skating.
All the other real skating afficionadoes seem to also agree that she has superb technical positions - they rave about her foot being just exactly the right height, her back so straight, etc. I think that she's got a coltishness about her that's still quite raw and gets her into trouble on occasion. She hasn't quite gotten used to her grown body and it's like her energy is sometimes flying out in all directions.
I can't wait to see the reruns tomorrow.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



