Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Matthew Bourne Sleeping Beauty -- Great Performances


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,732 posts

Posted 28 April 2014 - 02:54 PM

I don't know when this is running in general (my local PBS station shows GP programming at very odd times), but I saw this over the weekend and it's well worth looking for.  Like his Swan Lake, this is not the traditional choreography for Sleeping Beauty, but Bourne has crafted a logical story using most of the elements of the original, and has created some really musical choreography -- I was fascinated with his rhythmic structures.  If anyone here sees it, I'd be very curious to know what you think.



#2 California

California

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,562 posts

Posted 28 April 2014 - 03:04 PM

I have this on DVD, with a credit to WNET 2013. I'm wondering if you saw a rebroadcast of that or if this was a new presentation. (I'm guessing the former, given PBS' endless money problems.)  I also saw it at City Center in October 2013. I loved it, but critical responses were very mixed, as I remember. He has brought some coherence to the plot and updated it with clever contemporary elements. It also has some very funny moments. It's much more effective in the theater (as is so often the case.)



#3 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,732 posts

Posted 28 April 2014 - 09:08 PM

Well, this was listed on the PBS Great Performances website, but as I said, my local PBS station has an erratic relationship to GP programming -- I was glad to see it at all.  But gladder to hear that it's available on DVD, so I can get another look at it. 

 

We just don't see much Bourne in the Northwest, but what I have seen has been witty, musical and theatrically astute.  I know he's gotten some pushback, especially on his revisions of canon ballets, but think he's done some fascinating work.



#4 Cygnet

Cygnet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 736 posts

Posted 29 April 2014 - 07:46 AM

I saw it last Friday evening on PBS; and watched it again.  I agree that this is something that probably translates better IRL theatre, and not on screen.  I think the best work he's ever done is his version of Prokofiev's "Cinderella" set during WW2 during the blitz in London.  I can understand the critical pushback.  Although I'm a traditionalist, I do respect his work.  I think that his "Sleeping Beauty" is a hybrid of "True Blood," "Downton Abbey," and "Game of Thrones," set to a soundtrack that Balanchine declared was, "...the greatest score ever written for ballet."   That said, Bourne's vision is equally valid as any other choreographer's, and it's a good thing to look at new concepts of old works.  Nacho Duato's version for the Mikhailovsky Ballet isn't traditional either, even though the heroine and the corps de ballet remained en pointe.  I remember several years ago, Clement Crisp asked the question ,"... what will (Bourne) do when he runs out of the classics and their scores?"  Has Bourne attempted to answer that question?  Can, (will) Bourne create his own original work outside the frame of established masterpieces? 



#5 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,732 posts

Posted 29 April 2014 - 08:52 AM

While I can see the distinction that Crisp is discussing, I'm not frustrated -- all kinds of choreographers make works that respond to or work within existing repertory, bringing new perspectives to the source materials.  I was lucky enough to see Bourne's Play Without Words, which is a danced version of Harold Pinter and Joseph Losey's film The Servant, and it was brilliant, both in its translation of the film and as a piece of narrative/expressive movement theater.



#6 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,806 posts

Posted 29 April 2014 - 09:08 AM

Agreed, Play without Words was fantastic and original.  I think the best Bourne ballet which is a reworking of a classic warhorse is Swan Lake. I saw his Sleeping Beauty live, but I was not a fan of it.  The production values were very good, though.



#7 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 01 May 2014 - 01:17 PM

Sorry, guys, this was just awful.  His choreographic vocabulary is so very thin.  The angel-vampire figures just seemed a cheap piggybacking on pop-culture references. 

 

The music was great, though. 



#8 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,806 posts

Posted 01 May 2014 - 01:53 PM

Given the way the Bourne company operates (with a very limited number of lead dancers who perform every evening or every other evening) he intentionally creates "easy" choreography.  He cannot afford to lose dancers to injury on a regular basis, and so he does not ask much of the dancers in terms of technique.  I think the vocabulary is intentionally thin because of the nature of his company. 



#9 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 03 May 2014 - 06:22 PM

Given the way the Bourne company operates (with a very limited number of lead dancers who perform every evening or every other evening) he intentionally creates "easy" choreography.  He cannot afford to lose dancers to injury on a regular basis, and so he does not ask much of the dancers in terms of technique.  I think the vocabulary is intentionally thin because of the nature of his company. 

The choreography is thin, the concept is cheesy; what's left?  Sorry, I don't get the appeal at all; I don' t understand what the "nature" of such a company is. 



#10 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,732 posts

Posted 04 May 2014 - 08:26 PM

I'm afraid we're going to have to disagree about this.  I think Bourne is closer to musical theater than straight dance, which may be part of what you're seeing here, but I do think he has narrative skills and an interesting approach to music.



#11 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 05 May 2014 - 05:30 AM

Wow, Sandi, I guess I need to hear more from you on this--it's too uninteresting, to me, to be good musical theater.  And I was not compelled by the narrative at all. 



#12 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,732 posts

Posted 05 May 2014 - 11:18 AM

Let me get back to you about this -- I've got thoughts, but I'm on a deadline.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):