Jump to content


Balanchine and GiselleWhy no Giselle?


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#1 Eileen

Eileen

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 259 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 06:19 AM

I am throwing out this question - why did Balanchine reject Giselle as a ballet for his company?

 

I recently saw a 1969 film version of the ballet with the amazing Carla Fracci and Erik Bruhn. I have seen it on stage as well. In the first act, for much of the time the corps is animated wallpaper. In the second act, the corps stand, arms crossed in the distinctive posture, for long periods of time. The second act especially has its longeurs, even in the solo of Myrtha, danced by Eleanor D'Antuono. Again, you have the wallpaper of the corps, standing in position for lengthy periods.

 

This is, as any Balanchine afficionado knows, contrary to everything Balanchine conceived of. Balanchine's corps is integral to the ballet. There is no standing in pretty poses. Also, Giselle depends a great deal on mime, when the dancing comes to a stop and the story is told. Balanchine's choreography requires  minimal, often no, story telling through mime. Think of the innovations of Symphony in C and Concerto Barocco - the corps dances throughout, and they are "storyless". So is Jewels. So many examples.

 

I'd like to inquire of those with more knowledge of Balanchine and Giselle, as to whether my theories are correct, or if there is more to Balanchine's rejection of Giselle.



#2 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Emeralds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,730 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 06:44 AM

I'm going to hand the discussion of your main question to those who might know better than I but will point out that in the film you are speaking of, Myrtha is danced by Toni Lander. Eleanor d'Antuono may be in the peasant pas de deux, I don't recall right away. flowers.gif



#3 Eileen

Eileen

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 259 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 07:03 AM

Thank you for the correction, Mme. Hermine.



#4 kfw

kfw

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,304 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 07:11 AM

This is just a wild guess, but didn't he once say something disparaging about the music to some of the classics - something to the effect that it wasn't up to his standards? 

 

Anyhow, searching the George Balanchine Catalogue, I see that in 1946 he staged Act II, traditionally, for Ballet Theatre with Alonso, Youskevitch and Kaye. I hadn't known that!



#5 Jack Reed

Jack Reed

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,526 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 07:20 AM

That's right.  He knew Giselle that well.  An important point.

 

Just informally, from what I've picked up according to my interest in the ideas of the artist whose work got me hooked into enjoying that art form so many years ago - in the mid-'60s -  and without citing "chapter and verse" - published sources, and all that:  Balanchine actually liked Giselle and The Sleeping Beauty, too, and considered them the best of the 19th-Century ballets, but he didn't think his company should attempt everything - other companies could do those.  

 

And maybe he had in mind that other companies could do them in the appropriate, traditional ways of moving - he was onto different ways, appropriate to the ballets he was making - so that the old ballets would look their best performed elsewhere, too.  (Discussing staging S B, he complained that he couldn't put a fountain onstage, because his theater wouldn't accommodate it.  I take this partly as metaphor for his concern that S B be done right.)  Meanwhile, while other companies did their thing,  he would concentrate on exploring his own vision of what ballet could be, or become.

 

The activity of the corps you've noted startled European audiences when Balanchine's company toured there the first time - they were accustomed to dancers "standing in pretty poses," when what they saw watching Balanchine's dancers was a corps very often echoing movement that the solo performers had just shown, movement through poses (depending on the musical structure).  That is, they saw that if they were quick of eye, and paid attention.  The poses were there, clearly, in the flow, the through-line.

 

And, yes, he wanted to abandon most pantomime, observing that contemporary audiences wouldn't understand it.  Basically, his ballets look like he was taking advice from his chosen composer of the moment - even explaining, in response to a question about why he made some movement for a certain moment, "Tchaikovsky told me to."  (But he could tell a story when that was his project.  I love to watch the first scene of his Nutcracker - only his - for what it shows of his taking his composer's advice.)



#6 Jack Reed

Jack Reed

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,526 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 08:16 AM

This is just a wild guess, but didn't he once say something disparaging about the music to some of the classics - something to the effect that it wasn't up to his standards? 

...

 

More than once, I'd imagine.  Somewhere, maybe in that two-hour documentary Balanchine, made for PBS and issued on DVD, I've heard him say, slowly, disdainfully, "Min-kus," about the composer of the music for the "traditional" Petipa Don Quixote.   (I agree.  The prospect of all that "Min-kus" has kept me from watching that ballet.  A few excerpts are plenty.  As we know, Balanchine eventually made his own treatment, to commissioned music.)   

 

What has often delighted me is how he could take a piece from the concert repertory which doesn't need to accompany something else, as music for ballet often does, like effective movie music, which doesn't completely satisfy if it's heard without that something, and make something incorporating that music without looking silly, as other choreographers sometimes do. 



#7 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,674 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 08:20 AM

Yes, that was part of his genius.  Concerto Barocco is perhaps the clearest and best example of how he could take classical music and create ballet steps so perfectly musical that the viewer might think the music was specifically created for the ballet.  See the music, hear the dance.



#8 DanielBenton

DanielBenton

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 108 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 08:27 AM

In the one of the video series of Balanchine dancers (of the 1940s-60s) coaching more recent dancers (which seems to be available to libraries mostly) Maria Tallchief mentions that although he did not produce Giselle, Balanchine knew every part in it and taught it to her and other dancers.  I don't recall what the time period was.  As Jack Reed says. and Solomon Volkov reports, he would have done Sleeping Beauty if the funds and time were available to do it right.   



#9 rg

rg

    Emeralds Circle

  • Editorial Advisor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,444 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 09:06 AM

the single GISELLE entry in CHOREOGRAPHY BY BALANCHINE, item no. 234, concerns a scene in Ballet Theatre's '46 staging, which Balanchine himself set.

Balanchine was seeming of more than one mind about the 'old' ballet: on one hand if Volkov is to be completely trusted, and no recordings of Balanchine's saying what Volkov says he said to him exist as far as is known, Balanchine called GISELLE one of the 'great' ballets; on the other, he was said to have more or less sniffed when certain of his dancers said they might be leaving NYCB because they wanted to dance other ballets, GISELLE, per se: Ah! Giselle-itis!

 

as an aside, it might be noted that Nancy Goldner has an essay in, or at least soon to be published by, RARITAN about GISELLE, largely w/ regard to Violette Verdy's performance in it, about which she writes most enthusiastically. she expresses quite definite opinions about Fracci's Giselle, which are hardly positive.



#10 Jack Reed

Jack Reed

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,526 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 10:41 AM

Balanchine's being of different minds about a subject strikes me as a manifestation of a great virtue - his extremely lively mind, never really settled, producing fresh thoughts and, sometimes, seemingly contradictory statements at different times, his thoughts of the moment.  (Not that I think rg and I are in much disagreement about this.)

 

But a dancer's leaving him - that introduces another aspect:  I can imagine his disappointment, even hurt or anger, at the idea that someone is no longer an enthusiastic partner in his projects, especially after he may have spent many hours in the studio developing their unique talents.  (If I remember correctly, he was reported to be such when Gelsey Kirkland left his NYCB to dance with Baryshnikov at ABT.  Speaking of Giselles.)

 

Good to have the heads up about the Goldner article.   She's always well worth reading, although I would have loved to read Verdy's ideas about Fracci's Giselle, the way I had misread that at first.   



#11 Eileen

Eileen

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 259 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 11:44 AM

RG, is it possible you could provide a link to Nancy Goldner's article in Raritan when it comes out? If this is allowed? I'd love to read it, and have no access to Raritan. Thank you.



#12 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,209 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 12:01 PM

There are quite beautiful parts of the Don Q score that we rarely hear, since the "excerpts" usually heard are for the Act III PDD, which I think is the most hackneyed part of the score.



#13 Eileen

Eileen

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 259 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 12:23 PM

What impresses me about Balanchine and music, if he did feel negatively toward traditional ballet scores, is that he used serious classical music for his ballets. He used the Bach Double Violin Concerto for Concerto Barocco, Symphony in C by Bizet for the eponymous ballet, and of course, he introduced Stravinsky to many musical neophytes (like me). Then he used Mozart in Divertimento No. 15, and excerpts from Tchaikovsky scores, as in Allegro Brillante. His music is always serious classical, so of course he may have felt the light music of Adolph Adam was not in that league, and it is not.



#14 rg

rg

    Emeralds Circle

  • Editorial Advisor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,444 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 01:15 PM

i have no info at this point re: Goldner's RARITAN essay and it's availability on line.

if i learn it can be linked, i'll post about it.



#15 Jack Reed

Jack Reed

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,526 posts

Posted 16 April 2014 - 01:25 PM

So far, I see they're giving away some other material from the current issue, where Goldner's article appears, but not hers.  But the magazine may be available in shops that try to carry everything, including such "little" magazines.  (I suppose the term refers to their circulation numbers, like 10,000, instead of millions.)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):