Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

PA Ballet opening 2/6


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 07 February 2014 - 06:02 AM

Some brief observations.  The program last night was:

Serenade (Balanchine); Afternoon of a Faun (Robbins); Under the Sun Pas de Deux (Sappington); Petite Mort (Kylián). Complete casting can be found here

 

Serenade:  Competent, energetic performance, though I thought attention to detail was lacking (makes me question how well it was coached/rehearsed).  The Valse was too slow; Élégie too fast; orchestra sounded ragged (which is often the case on opening nights here).  The stage of the Merriam Theater, where PA ballet does many of its rep programs, felt cramped.  Finally, the tulle skirts didn't seem to fit quite right--they seemed to ride awfully low on the dancers' hips.  Amy Aldridge, scheduled to dance, did not appear; that change is reflected in the attached casting.   

 

Jermel Johnson shined in Faun, in which he partnered Julie Diana.  They both appeared to have been well-coached and well-rehearsed (by Bart Cook) in this narcissistic psychodrama of a pdd. 

Under the Sun:  Unspeakable, ghastly pdd, but mercifully short.  Live music helped make it tolerable.  (This pdd will be part of PA Ballet's PBS/WHYY broadcast sometime this spring, along with Diamonds, as detailed here.) 

Petite Mort:  the Kylián formula is not interesting to me, but the performers did a great job.    And again, the live music made it more interesting. 



#2 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,349 posts

Posted 07 February 2014 - 01:08 PM

Thank you for posting, Ray.

 

You summed up my feelings on "Petite Mort."



#3 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 12:33 PM

I vaguely remember Under the Sun from many years ago (some PBS program), but yes, not particularly great.

 

I've seen a couple of productions of Serenade in the recent past where they've made what feel like odd choices about the costumes -- very shiny bodices, and some where the skirts start fairly low on the hip.  I don't really know how much leeway individual companies have for that ballet.

 

I'm not a huge fan of Petit Mort, but I still find things to look at in it.  And dancers love doing it.  I think I like it better than ballet companies trying to perform modern dance classics without the style or the training. 

 

Or at least that's what I think today!



#4 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,349 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 01:31 PM


I'm not a huge fan of Petit Mort, but I still find things to look at in it.  And dancers love doing it.  I think I like it better than ballet companies trying to perform modern dance classics without the style or the training. 

Are these our only options?



#5 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 04:36 PM

 


I'm not a huge fan of Petit Mort, but I still find things to look at in it.  And dancers love doing it.  I think I like it better than ballet companies trying to perform modern dance classics without the style or the training. 

Are these our only options?

 

 

Certainly not, but there are days when it seems like those are the choices being made for us...



#6 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,349 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 05:03 PM

I really do have to find one of those animated weeping icons for this site...



#7 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 12:16 AM

I really do have to find one of those animated weeping icons for this site...

 

Just take it as read.



#8 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 07:18 AM

For what it's worth (not much IMHO), here's the local yokel's "review" of the performance, which trots out the Company's boilerplate about Serenade being its "signature" ballet (whatevs, as the kids say), and makes some obscure comments about Julie Diana's extension in Faun

 

This "critic," you may note in the byline, is a staff writer at the paper, not a stringer.   Cue the weeping emoticons! 



#9 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 11:38 AM

The review is filed as a "mini-history" of the company, and honestly, it works slightly better as that. 



#10 Amy Reusch

Amy Reusch

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,781 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 01:04 PM

I've never seen the Sappington piece but distinctly remember a long time fan of the PAB rapturously describing it from memory. It sounded cool. I'm sorry to hear the reality has not withstood the test of time. Perhaps it is like certain pop groups; years later no one can remember why they liked it. Structuralists seem to win out in the long run.

#11 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 01:22 PM

I've never seen the Sappington piece but distinctly remember a long time fan of the PAB raputously describing it from memory. It sounded cool. I'm sorry to hear the reality has not withstood the test of time. Perhaps it is like certain pop groups; years later no one can remember why they liked it. Structuralists seem to win out in the long run.

My opinion is that they revived this b/c it was already in their rep, so they didn't have to pay much for it.  It has no particular resonance for PAB dancers or audiences. 



#12 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 01:43 PM

The little that I remember was about the actual partnering -- stretchy and bendy stuff, that seemed contemporary at the time, which means of course that now it would seem fairly tame and dated.



#13 Amy Reusch

Amy Reusch

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,781 posts

Posted 09 February 2014 - 10:47 PM

Ray, isn't this the Calder piece?

#14 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 10 February 2014 - 05:16 AM

Ray, isn't this the Calder piece?

Yes.  Since the Calders have deep roots in Philly (Alexander's father and grandfather both worked and made public art here; at one point you could look done one end of the Ben Franklin Parkway and see Calder's grandfather's fountain; on the other end, on the Phila. Art Museum plaza above the "Rocky stairs," there was a Calder stabile, now sold off to a museum in Seattle), there was at one time a drive to build a Calder Museum, not too far from the new Barnes.  I think this pdd was done to commemorate him in the spirit of launching or supporting that project (which looks dead in the water for now.)  But I'd rather sit in front of an actual Calder than watch this pdd. 



#15 Amy Reusch

Amy Reusch

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,781 posts

Posted 10 February 2014 - 06:51 AM

I guess I would still like to see it once to see what Calder references she cme up with. I suspect a straight forward video would be about as interesting as a flat video of an actual Calder.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):