Jump to content

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Sunday, June 2

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,148 posts

Posted 03 June 2013 - 03:13 AM

Alastair Macaulay reviews "Shostakovich Trilogy":


Each of the three ballets has ensembles of asymmetrical multiplicity — no single pattern governs the solos, duets and other groups that come and go — suggesting the randomness of society in a way I recall in no other ballet. Often dancers stand on flat feet like ordinary folk and use informal body language and gestures. But all of them, whether everyday pedestrians or impassioned artists or heroic athletes, inhabit a society where they are not free.

New York Post review:


“Chamber Symphony” may be a fantasia on Shostakovich’s life — though if we’re to believe Ratmansky, the composer’s three wives were High Maintenance, Consumptive and Rebound. Even if the idea of the suffering artist at odds with society is familiar, Ratmansky states it with conviction and makes a tour de force role for David Hallberg, who never seems to leave the stage.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):