Jump to content


Osipova named Principal at Royal B while staying with Mikhailovsky


  • Please log in to reply
82 replies to this topic

#31 mussel

mussel

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 473 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 12:10 PM


That was 2005 and the Bolshoi tour as part Lincoln Center festival occurred after ABT Met season ended. Consider Bolshoi was Nina's home theater back then and there's no overlap with ABT Met season, that wasn't a non-compete covenant issue.

Do we know when the 3-month before & after clause was first used? Is it possible that this 2005 visit triggered it?

I doubt the existence of the 3-month before/after clause, it's just too restrictive & draconian. Do we have confirmation it exists? If it does, it certainly didn't apply to Vishneva as she toured with Mariinsky during its 3-week season at City Center in April 2008. I remember she got injured towards the end of the tour and was out of the entire ABT Met season, and Nina had to sub most of her slots and filled the house in every of her performances. Nina was such good sport, no wonder New York absolutely loved and loves her. I assume NYCB has no 3-month clause with its dancer as Wendy will be guesting with NDT at the State Theater next week. Before the departure of NYCO from Lincoln Center, NYCB and ABT were totally overlapping their spring seasons, and visiting companies conflicting with ABT Met was never an issue. The first season after NYCO left Lincoln Center, came Mikhailovsky and the non-compete covenant became an unwanted publicity. That same season Kobborg danced with RDB at the State Theater and ABT the same time, I assume the Kobborg's gig with ABT was last minute arrangement and the non-compete covenant didn't apply.

#32 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,616 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 12:14 PM

Kobborg was a guest artist at ABT. Didn't he do one performance that season at ABT, and it was on an emergency basis? (Was that the season he replaced Max at the last minute as Irina's partner in Giselle?) I'm sure he was not required to sign any such agreement. From what I've seen, NYCB dancers are not restricted in any way during the off season.

Here is the link to the article I was referring to:
http://timeoutchicag...ector-interview

The portion I alluded to in this interview w. Kevin McKenzie is as follows:

You recently exercised a non-competition clause with regard to Natalia Osipova and Ivan Vasiliev, dancers who perform both with ABT and with the Mikhailovsky Ballet in Russia. Are there times when that clause has been waived in the past and, if so, what factors into whether or not you enforce the terms of agreements concerning international stars?
[ABT] has excercised that clause a lot and it’s waived it a lot, on a case-by-case basis. I view it on this level: There’s a professional courtesy that performers and managers within the same organization give each other. If you’re scheduled to perform with your home company, you don’t perform three months before or after [with another company] within a 100-mile radius without giving notice. [If you would like to do that], bring it up and we’ll talk it out. With any of ABT’s principals, the expectation is set that I won’t release them while we’re in the Met because, number one, [the Met season] is so dense: 64 straight performances. For [principal dancers] to be getting on planes, going somewhere [to guest] and coming back, is wear and tear that—they can do that later in the year, unless it’s an extraordinary opportunity. We do make adjustments for what they want to do but, you know, a dancer wants to do everything all the time. They don’t need to do everything all at once, all the time. That’s my role, to keep the needs and wants lists clear.
The “star system” and international guesting comes and goes in the ballet world. It’s certainly common right now but hasn’t always been in the past. Is engaging principals from other countries always a win? Do you prefer the current system any more or less than a paradigm where dancers are firmly associated with single companies?
It is the paradigm right now [to engage guest artists]. But I’d like to be really clear: Yes, I engage guest principals, but my own principals are guests everywhere else. I’m not only juggling bringing people in; we’re juggling our own people’s schedules, too. [ABT dancers] have the right to go out and be guests. It’s a good thing for people to cross-pollinate.
So if someone wants to be catty and say that ABT stands for “Ardani Ballet Theatre”…
[Laughs] Yes, I would say that’s what that sounds like.





I agree that the number of weeks a dancer is prohibited from dancing in NYC seems to be so overbroad as to be unenforceable in a court of law. So a dancer who signs on for an 8 weeks stint with ABT is forbidden from working in NYC for a total of 8 months! Outrageous. I guess Roberto Bolle got a waiver, since his Roberto and Friends gig is mid September.

#33 California

California

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,475 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 12:46 PM

So a dancer who signs on for an 8 weeks stint with ABT is forbidden from working in NYC for a total of 8 months! Outrageous. I guess Roberto Bolle got a waiver, since his Roberto and Friends gig is mid September.

I can't find that restriction in the earlier message or the article in Time Out. I'm only seeing 3-months before and after. Where does it say that?


#34 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,616 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 12:52 PM

Right, so if you sign up for a two month ABT season at the Met, in addition to being unable to work elsewhere in NYC during that two month time period, you are also prohibited from working in NYC 3 months before your engagment and 3 months after your engagment.

3 months pre-Met restriction , plus 2 month Met engagment restriction, plus an additional 3 months post-Met engagement restriction equals a total restriction of 8 months that you are forbidden from working in NYC with anyone other than ABT (absent the grant of a waiver from ABT). This is how I interpret McKenzie's words. If you recall, the Mik briefly attempted to reschedule their NYC engagement for the time period in July AFTER the ABT Met Season was over. However, that didn't work out either. Apparently, the restriction on O/V continued even after they had completed their work with ABT on the Met Stage as of early July.

#35 Natalia

Natalia

    Rubies Circle

  • Foreign Correspondent
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,393 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 01:03 PM

Maybe Bolle's 'Friends' gig is considered a set of 'concerts' (bunch of solos and pdds) and, thus, not a full traditional company with a rep of complete ballets? Same deal as the annual YAGP galas that take place a couple of weeks before ABT's Met season; ABT dancers usually appear at the YAGP gala, just days before the Met season opens. Cornejo & Gomes will be dancing in this year's YAGP gala on April 18.

#36 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,616 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 01:12 PM

Yes, I'm guessing that waivers are granted for certain shows, like Kings of Dance, YAGP, Vishneva Dialogues and the like. However, it seems like ABT is afraid of the competiition from full length productions of story ballets. By the way, in my opinion OV had no responsiblity for sorting any of this out in connection with the failed Mik tour to NYC. That's what their manager Ardani was supposed to do. Hopefully Danilian will not be so sloppy in the future handling of their affairs.

#37 Jayne

Jayne

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 870 posts

Posted 08 April 2013 - 09:54 PM

Osipova / Vasiliev have plenty of offers, and don't need ABT to make their careers successful. They need a better lawyer to rework their contracts. I'm very certain their names sell tickets in NYC. Far more so than other principals - domestic and foreign.

#38 California

California

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,475 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 04:02 AM

Dance Magazine just sent this out on Twitter:

Dance Magazine Dance Magazine ‏@Dance_Magazine 2m
MT @bellafigural Osipova in Kommersant: http://bit.ly/Y9LxhP Royal Ballet principal her main job from now on, likes London better than NY

Can anyone translate this article? http://kommersant.ru/doc/2165603

#39 Mashinka

Mashinka

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,176 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 04:13 AM

A preference for London is easily explained - it's a mere four hour flight to Moscow.

#40 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,616 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:23 AM

I'm sure the fact that she got mugged in NY didn't improve her opinion of our city. Also, I'm sure the debacle involving the Mik tour to NY did not improve her view of working for ABT. (It should have also alerted her to the fact that Ardani Management is incompetent.) And yes, I believe Osipova and Vishneva are the only two ABT ballerinas who can sell out the Met. However, based on these developments, I'm guessing McKenzie may be on the hunt for another international star ballerina to guest in future seasons. On my personal wish list would be Big Red Kondaurova, Tereshkina, or Smirnova.

#41 Natalia

Natalia

    Rubies Circle

  • Foreign Correspondent
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,393 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:45 AM

From the above Kommersant quote:
Osipova in Kommersant: http://bit.ly/Y9LxhP Royal Ballet principal her main job from now on, likes London better than NY

I'm sure she likes our money, though. That's reason enough to book tix to see anybody but Osipova, even if she jetes her way up to the moon. Hee Seo and Isabella Boylston are my choices! I don't think that they complained publicly about Moscow during ABT's own tour to Russia last year, did they?

#42 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,125 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 08:50 AM

There are plenty of reasons to like London better than NYC: it depends on the person. If she's be happier there, then it's up to McKenzie to decide after her current contract is over whether it's worth it to him and the company for her to go back to a guest arrangement and be scheduled for what she can give him, like Cojocaru, Vishneva, Bolle, etc.



#43 mussel

mussel

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 473 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 02:39 PM

I believe when Makarova defected to the West, London was her first choice but RB didn't sign her over the strong objection from the reigning primas. I am sure RB will clear Osipova's schedule during the Met season as part of her contract. She has toured with ABT extensively for the past 2 years, to Japan, Spain, So. Cal., DC, Chicago...etc., I think she'll cut her tour with ABT to minimal to none, while her commitment to the Met season will remain intact, so it's the cities on ABT touring schedule that will lose out not seeing her.

#44 volcanohunter

volcanohunter

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,897 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 03:07 PM

The Royal Ballet would have been limited in its ability to hire Makarova because at the time membership in the company was restricted to British nationals and citizens of the Commonwealth. Nureyev was never especially happy that he was always a "guest artist" with the company, but it was the only possible solution at the time. In 1980 EEC rules forced the company to open up its hiring practices, and the first foreigner hired under the new scheme was Alessandra Ferri. Many others followed, of course, but whether this was a good thing for the Royal Ballet and its style is another matter. Now, as is well known, most of the RB's principals are not British, and following the retirement of Leanne Benjamin, Steven McRae will be alone in carrying the banner for the "colonials."

Opening the audition process to foreigners does not necessarily mean that a company will be overrun by outsiders, obviously. The Paris Opera Ballet is also required to open its auditions to EU citizens (and makes them open to others as well), but it continues to hire primarily French dancers.

#45 mimsyb

mimsyb

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 271 posts

Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:52 PM

From the above Kommersant quote:
Osipova in Kommersant: http://bit.ly/Y9LxhP Royal Ballet principal her main job from now on, likes London better than NY

I'm sure she likes our money, though. That's reason enough to book tix to see anybody but Osipova, even if she jetes her way up to the moon. Hee Seo and Isabella Boylston are my choices! I don't think that they complained publicly about Moscow during ABT's own tour to Russia last year, did they?

Agreed. Also, Semionova is another reason to not book tickets for Osipova. She's lovely. And versatile.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):