Sergei Filin Attacked
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:37 AM
Posted 11 February 2013 - 10:37 AM
Tsiskaridze rejects this charge categorically. In the warring interviews in Snob magazine about which the NYT reported, Tsiskaridze stated that he could not possibly have been behind the publication of the sex photos because one of the women pictured is a fellow Godparent, which in Orthodox practice effectively makes them relatives, but that Iksanov "not being Orthodox" (Iksanov is of Tatar origin) could not understand these things.
This may not mean anything, but in this TV report from a few years ago about Tsiskaridze as teacher, there is footage of Yanin taking Tsiskaridze's class. He's the first person you see.
I wish the press would be clearer in relating the back story. Yanin is still at the Bolshoi, albeit no longer as company manager.
Posted 11 February 2013 - 11:10 AM
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:11 PM
“It was a lot more than criticising the theater. Going to the top artists in the nation to ask them to sign a petition based on outright lies about the state of the current administration is the type of action that would get most people fired on the spot.”
It seems to me that criticising the theatre's management is not the same as criticising the theatre.
The letter of the top artists of the nation did not contain a single grain of ‘outright lies about the state of the current administration’. In fact, no lies at all. Please open this site, roll the page down and see a scan of this letter with signatures of 12 top artists: http://tikandelaki.l...com/322564.html
The letter suggested that in order to maintain the status of the Bolshoi as a leading theatre the changes are needed after the changeover at the end of December 2012 of the Director General A.G.Iksanov who has been holding the post since 2000.
That’s all. Nothing else has been said about the current administration. And it was true that Mr. Iksanov’s contract was due to expire in December 2012. Where are the ‘outright lies’?
Then Mr.Iksanov’s contract was extended till the end of 2014 and some top artists began apologising.
I also heard about good relationship between Tsiskaridze and Yanin when during the latest London tour they were sharing the dressing room at Covent Garden. Mr. Iksanov’s statement that he is in ‘no doubt' that NT was involved in the 2011 publication of Yanin’s photos has puzzled me. The laptop was stolen by someone, the personal mail and files were broken into, the unseemly pictures were e-mailed to 3000 people all over the world - and Yanin resigned. Why the management didn’t insist afterwards on investigation into these criminal actions and on punishment for the culprits?
Posted 11 February 2013 - 12:39 PM
Iksanov is on shaky ground if he accuses Tsiskaridze of being behind the Yanin smear campaign, unless he has proof.
Posted 11 February 2013 - 01:24 PM
"Filin was about to resign or not sign a new contract, Filin's contract was not going to be renewed, etc."
Sorry, Helene, you are confusing something. The letter was not about Filin. It was about the end of Iksanov's contract.
Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:35 PM
If my post had read, "Iksanov was about to resign or not sign a new contract, Iksanov's contract was not going to be renewed, etc." this would have been better in some way? This issue has nothing to do with the attack on Filin, but speaks to Iksanov's assertion that Tsiskaridze helped foster a specific atmosphere at the theater.
After the petition went public, at least two major artists who signed the petition went on record,
"I was told that your contract had not been renewed; and, being afraid that the theater could get a person who is incompetent in music, I signed the letter." (Yelena Obraztsova)
""Nikolay Maksimovich told me that the third term of Iksanov's contract is expiring, and that he is not eligible for a fourth term according to the law. Tsiskaridze gave me a list of people, and I put my signature on it. I didn't have time to read the letter, I was working at the Conservatory," said the singer." (Zurab Sotkilava)
Again, this is not about what was in the petition, but how Tsiskaridze obtained the signatures, which speaks to his character, both the in Obraztsova quote, where what he said was technically true, but there was no need for a petition if Iksanov's contract was to be renewed, and in his misrepresentation of the legal issue to Sotkilava. Major artists generally do not go out of their way to have to make publicly embarrassing retractions.
It's after December 2012, and, obviously, Iksanov is still there. He even gave a little speech before the "La Bayadere" transmission.
Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:18 AM
And why are accusations about the Yanin scandal still being made? Why is there still a question mark over this when surely this criminal act should have been thoroughly investigated by the police and charges brought against whoever was guilty? I sincerely hope that whoever attacked Filin doesn’t get away with it in the same way that those responsible for Yanin’s on-line attack got away with it.
Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:28 AM
Posted 12 February 2013 - 06:06 AM
Posted 12 February 2013 - 08:52 AM
This is, of course, an art form that treasures its ancients, but maybe not in management issues.
Posted 12 February 2013 - 09:07 AM
I totally agree, there was an intriguing back story to the Briantsev murder as I've been told the fire at his theatre was arson and no accident. Russia is a lawless place and has a corrupt judiciary so framing an innocent person is very easy if you have the money (better still a lever for blackmail) to pay off/threaten the judge.
Posted 12 February 2013 - 11:03 AM
Posted 12 February 2013 - 11:20 AM
Lawlessness breeds lawlessness, and step one is to try to establish illegitimacy. That he's been agitating relentlessly within the company is no secret. It's no surprise that, while the translation of Tsiskaridze's literal words were that if Iksanov were Orthodox, he'd understand Tsiskaridze's relationship to Yanin, does anyone really think he wasn't also saying "He's not one of us"? He's the self-proclaimed "preserver of ballet orthodoxy," which is funny when you think about it, with the Bolshoi rep having works like "Spartacus" and "Carmen" so affiliated with the company. You'd think from his words that he was chaneling Petipa, not Grigorovich.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: