Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Skorik


  • Please log in to reply
443 replies to this topic

#256 Mashinka

Mashinka

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,196 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 04:41 AM

Legs? Appearance? Pluses certainly but not essentials.

Solid technique, stamina, personality, sensitivity and the ability to dance rather than just pose all matter far more. The more quotes I read from Fateev, the more I consider him a complete idiot.


#257 Birdsall

Birdsall

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:39 AM

Legs? Appearance? Pluses certainly but not essentials.

Solid technique, stamina, personality, sensitivity and the ability to dance rather than just pose all matter far more. The more quotes I read from Fateev, the more I consider him a complete idiot.


I agree with you, Mashinka! I think Pawlick's book and other sources say that normally Vaganova trained dancers can be hired as principals anywhere around the world usually. They are considered "finished" artists when they graduate. Of course, I think Skorik graduated from Perm, but to be hired for the Mariinsky stage means someone thought she was as good as a Vaganova graduate.....when so many are "finished artists" and so many can hit the ground running, so to speak, it is crazy to "give someone time" to grow and push that person over and over onto the public (and maybe push her too much since she said in Russia Today that she goes ahead and dances on injuries). With so many ballerinas who are ready and willing to hit the ground running with no extra coaching, why keep trying to fit a square peg into a round hole???

I do think administration is to blame. The whole thing seems reckless on Fateyev's part. He's going to cause injuries to dancers and make the Mariinsky look bad. A friend told me that in the past someone studied a role at the Kirov for 2 years sometimes and they did not dance it until they were 100% ready for the role. So when they debuted in the role you got a stupendous performance.

#258 Birdsall

Birdsall

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:24 AM

This is ridiculous. I can imagine the inner talking among the true ballerinas of the Mariinsky about this woman...


I wonder also about what the coaches are thinking. I mean, they must be used to dancers coming to them with a certain level of technical ability. It is like the teachers I used to work with in middle school. They would be in total shock that you have incoming 6th graders who do not know their multiplication tables yet! And the Math teachers are told they MUST cover up to chapter 6 by October or something like that, so there is really no time to go back and teach 3rd grade material in 6th grade, but there is no choice if you want your students to succeed. If they can't do 3rd grade material they certainly can't move through 6th grade material at a rapid pace. And the teacher is to blame for low test scores!

I am going off on a tangent, but I wonder if it applies here. What do these Mariinsky coaches think when they are used to (in the past) getting dancers who are pretty much "finished" artists and they just have to rehearse and teach roles and remind and adjust slight issues? Instead they are hypothetically getting some dancers who they have to do a lot of extra teaching. I wonder if some of the Mariinsky coaches are thinking, "OMG! WTF???"

#259 Birdsall

Birdsall

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:27 AM

Money would explain a lot of the blindness. Any other reason is inexplicable. But some sort of financial reasons for crazy decisions would explain a lot. But how sad. I guess that is the world.....

#260 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,330 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 07:48 AM

Money and power have always been the way of the ballet world. They don't influence every decision and decision-maker equally, and there have been many favored dancers with extraordinary talent and training, too, but it's not as as if ballet was pure through Soviet times and only since glasnost has it become sullied. It has changed to an extent, but there has been plenty of time to discover that an empty aesthetic and substandard training for dancers in a misguided attempt to deliver a blatant misunderstanding of what appeals to "Western" taste will not translate into any more tour dollars than presenting well-trained dancers who embody a more traditional aesthetic.

If the ballet is a slave to opera, what would have been left of the school and ballet without Gergiev's efforts? Might it have gone more towards the way of figure skating, as a generation was lost?

Some of the coaches have had their say in Catherine Pawlick's book, but Pawlick also describes a time where even Vaganova embraced an aesthetic that was new for the time that sounded pretty vulgar to me, and it went pretty far before Vaganova decided it had crossed the line into circus.

#261 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,901 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 08:11 AM

Regarding aesthetics, I remember watching a video where Natalia Makarova was coaching Uliana Lopatkina in the White Swan pdd. At one point Lopatkina unhurled her legs in a rather stretched attitude, and Makarova asked her why she was doing that, when the choreography calls for an arabesque. Lopatkina got rather defensive and said, "Aesthetics." Makarova asked her to try the other approach and Lopatkina got even more defensive and said "I don't LIKE it!!!!" My impression is that at the Mariinsky, aesthetics (in particular, a long, stretched look) is more important than ever.

#262 Cygnet

Cygnet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 734 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 12:33 PM


Legs? Appearance? Pluses certainly but not essentials.

Solid technique, stamina, personality, sensitivity and the ability to dance rather than just pose all matter far more. The more quotes I read from Fateev, the more I consider him a complete idiot.


...I do think administration is to blame...

ITA with what Mashinka and Birdsall have posted; with these additional thoughts: Fateev reigns supreme over the Ballet; his mere whim is "law" as it pertains to the Ballet. The coaches may pronounce their displeasure, they may request roles for their charges, but the ultimate decision is his. He decides who, what, when, where and (as he did with Skoryk's predecessor, and in the cited link above), why a dancer is frequently cast. He wills it to be so, and d*mmit, all of us are going to like it. It's all about his gut instincts and his belief about what a dancer can (and "eventually" will -> Posted Image) accomplish, given umpteen chances, and his personal taste. It's hard not to be facetious here, but he believes that we should all trust his judgement because it's his judgement.

Since Fateev is in charge as the interim ballet director, there's nothing that can be done about this because, as with all A.D.s, all of these matters - casting, development (or the lack thereof), everything that happens onstage - are his prerogative as the Head. What's key here is that Maestro Gergiev allows this because he's concentrating on the Opera and the Orchestra and he approves of Fateev and his leadership. Why? Because ballet is an art that Maestro Gergiev doesn't understand or care about.

#263 Jayne

Jayne

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 879 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 04:54 PM

As long as Putin is in power - Gergiev is in power. And as long as Gergiev is in power, he will choose a ballet director who will not challenge Gergiev. Futher, he will only designate him "acting" ballet director, in order to maintain control. I assume the term "acting" prevents certain labor laws from going into effect that might protect Fateyev.

Fortunately for Fateyev, his boss doesn't really understand ballet technique. I know Fateyev is a fan of Balanchine. There is nothing wrong with this appreciation, and I do think Mariinsky has chosen some great Balanchine pieces to add to their rep. However, he has latched onto a specific idea of the "ideal" ballerina, based on Mr B's bone-skinny ideal. I know he spent a year teaching at PNB in 1999 and how to better stage Balanchine technique. But I wonder if he saw the aesthetic of the bone-thin ballerina, and missed the musical qualities altogether???

#264 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,330 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 05:05 PM

Fateev certainly didn't get the idea of a bone-thin ballerina from PNB in 1999. Patricia Barker had been Kent Stowell's muse and first cast for quite a while by then, and she had well-defined muscles and wasn't a waif by any means. Carrie Imler was on the rise, and neither she nor Lisa Apple, Julie Tobi!sson nor even Kaori Nakamura are the uber thin, all~legs types. Linette Hitchen and Louise Nadeau were probably closest in type to a Somova or Skorik, but they were never as prominently cast.

#265 Mashinka

Mashinka

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,196 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 01:19 AM

Regarding aesthetics, I remember watching a video where Natalia Makarova was coaching Uliana Lopatkina in the White Swan pdd. At one point Lopatkina unhurled her legs in a rather stretched attitude, and Makarova asked her why she was doing that, when the choreography calls for an arabesque. Lopatkina got rather defensive and said, "Aesthetics." Makarova asked her to try the other approach and Lopatkina got even more defensive and said "I don't LIKE it!!!!" My impression is that at the Mariinsky, aesthetics (in particular, a long, stretched look) is more important than ever.


Slightly off topic, but back in the 80's I was doing some work for a contemporary group that rehearsed at Pineapple Dance Studios, I would often arrive early to watch the ballet class given by Eileen Ward that attracted some RB dancers. On one occasion I saw a small slender woman take her place at the back just before the class began: it was Makarova. I won't have to tell anyone reading this what supreme pleasure it was just to watch her in class.

Many years later I watched a company class of the Kirov in Baden Baden. Several minutes after the class began a tall woman trailing more scarves than Isadora Duncan made her entrance disrupting the class as she chose the most advantageous spot and displacing other dancers that had arrived on time: this was Lopatkina.

One was a servant of the Dance, whereas the other.................

#266 cantdance

cantdance

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 60 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 08:22 AM

Here is a link from RT apr30 27min long dubbed to english. Has both Skorik, Fateyev, and Vishneva. Coaching and backstage life at the Mariinsky. From Oksana point of view. http://rt.com/shows/...-mariinsky-628/

#267 Cygnet

Cygnet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 734 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 08:47 AM

As long as Putin is in power - Gergiev is in power. And as long as Gergiev is in power, he will choose a ballet director who will not challenge Gergiev. Futher, he will only designate him "acting" ballet director, in order to maintain control. I assume the term "acting" prevents certain labor laws from going into effect that might protect Fateyev.

This is precisely what's going on. This arrangement is totally beneficial to Maestro Gergiev. Mr. Putin isn't a Renaissance Man: He's into daredevil sports and would rather wrestle bears or hanglide with eagles than attend
the opera or ballet. So, as Gergiev trusts Fateev, Putin trusts Gergiev because he's not into high culture.

#268 Jayne

Jayne

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 879 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 09:30 AM

Fateev certainly didn't get the idea of a bone-thin ballerina from PNB in 1999. Patricia Barker had been Kent Stowell's muse and first cast for quite a while by then, and she had well-defined muscles and wasn't a waif by any means. Carrie Imler was on the rise, and neither she nor Lisa Apple, Julie Tobi!sson nor even Kaori Nakamura are the uber thin, all~legs types. Linette Hitchen and Louise Nadeau were probably closest in type to a Somova or Skorik, but they were never as prominently cast.

I'm not implying that he learned this aesthetic while at PNB - I think he is trying to match Balanchine's ideal of the bone-thin girl that became normative in the 1960's. Balanchine works have received more favorable reviews at Mariinsky after Fateyev returned from a year at PNB. So he must have learned something.

I have no idea what he thought of rising Carrie Imler, but she definitely looks more like an old school Kirov ballerina than Skorik's modern match stick look.

#269 cubanmiamiboy

cubanmiamiboy

    Diamonds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,269 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 12:56 PM

Regarding aesthetics, I remember watching a video where Natalia Makarova was coaching Uliana Lopatkina in the White Swan pdd. At one point Lopatkina unhurled her legs in a rather stretched attitude, and Makarova asked her why she was doing that, when the choreography calls for an arabesque. Lopatkina got rather defensive and said, "Aesthetics." Makarova asked her to try the other approach and Lopatkina got even more defensive and said "I don't LIKE it!!!!" My impression is that at the Mariinsky, aesthetics (in particular, a long, stretched look) is more important than ever.


How funny...canbelto. You reminded me a conversation that I had maaaaaany years ago with a friend of mine, a ballet lover. I was still living in Cuba, and my mother, who was here, had send me a video of a Russian SL. We watched the VHS at my place, and at one point my friend commented "Oh, look...just like all the Russian ballerinas, doing attitudes instead of arabesques". Wow...and that was a zillion years ago...Posted Image

#270 tutu

tutu

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 05:33 PM

Here is a link from RT apr30 27min long dubbed to english. Has both Skorik, Fateyev, and Vishneva. Coaching and backstage life at the Mariinsky. From Oksana point of view. http://rt.com/shows/...-mariinsky-628/


Thank you for linking to this, cantdance. Certainly offers a very interesting perspective.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):