Cubanmiamiboy, Paris, La Fille Mal Gardee. 07/13
Posted 20 July 2012 - 02:20 AM
With Ashton's Cinderella I think it was a case of knowing his audience, it was premiered I believe in 1948 and at that time audiences would have been thoroughly steeped in the traditional English pantomime tradition (probably not the case today) so there would have been no question of creating the ugly sisters as anything other than pantomime dames as the audience wouldn't have accepted anything other than two men in drag. I was taken aback at my first view of the sisters on point - it was a real culture shock! The Russians do go in for the drag concept occasionally though with Nureyev choreographing the wicked stepmother for a man in his Cinderella and Vladimir Vasiliev in the same role in his version of the ballet was a sight to behold, a memory that will stay with me for the rest of my days, let’s just say there is camp and then there is Vasiliev.
Living in London, I can just get on the train and be in Paris in a couple of hours, it still exerts its spell on me and it will always be my favourite city, it doesn't matter how many times you visit, there is always something new to discover. Glad you liked the Chagall ceiling, I remember sharing a box once with two Danish girls who were celebrating one of their birthdays by going to a performance just to see that ceiling. The original is behind it though and I've always been curious about that one too. So glad to hear the three of you had such a wonderful time and I bet your first trip to Paris won't be your last.
Posted 20 July 2012 - 04:51 AM
I prefer the classics interspersed with some modern stuff, but not just modern mass appeal stuff. But maybe it is how they survive in this economy. I don't know.
Posted 20 July 2012 - 06:20 AM
Oh, YOU BET, Miss Mashinka!
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:33 AM
Maybe if you view the two different La Fille Mal Gardee as totally different ballets you will like both. I view the Gorsky one that you showed me as basically stemming directly from Petipa's influence and so even though it was created later it is basically a 19th century ballet.
In contrast I view Ashton's as a 20th century ballet. The two works are two totally different works and can be enjoyed immensely in their own ways.
It is like the different movie versions of Wuthering Heights. More recent versions of Wuthering Heights have captured the more violent aspects of the novel much better than the famous Laurence Olivier/Merle Oberon movie. The first time I saw the Olivier/Oberon movie version I hated it, b/c it glamorizes the love between Heathcliff and Catherine. I felt it was all wrong. Too 1940ish Hollywood. But over time I have come to really enjoy the movie, and I like the new contemporary versions I have seen too even if they also get aspects of this wonderful novel wrong. The new versions are not afraid to show the more violent and unsavory aspects of the story.
Anyway, my point is that you can enjoy several different versions of the same story when you understand when and how they were created and how times changed. We re-make movies all the time, and sometimes they are good re-makes, sometimes they are not. Often they are simply different.
But the key to Ashton's is that it is a contemporary ballet, not trying to copy the previous versions.
Posted 20 July 2012 - 01:23 PM
Just as with Duato's Beauty, Nureyev' Cinderella, Morris' Hard Nut, Bourne's SL or Ek's Giselle..? No...I'm not comparing Ashton's respectful recreation with all those, but damn if i can digest any of that...
Posted 20 July 2012 - 01:32 PM
Posted 20 July 2012 - 01:39 PM
Definitely Helene, which is why I know those others are completely different animals. Just mentioning them to note my strong impossibility to expand my ballet vision of some sorts...
Posted 20 July 2012 - 02:10 PM
Thanks, Helene! Yes, I didn't mean to say Ashton's recreation is comparable to Ek's Giselle. Although I have to say that I bought Ek's Giselle b/c it sounded so zany and weird (Giselle is crazy and in an asylum in Act 2 and Albrecht ends up totally nude). I thought it would be a good party dvd for a good laugh. And I actually found it sort of fascinating and enjoyed it as a modern ballet that is not really Giselle.
I understand Cristian's reluctance to want to see some modern dance. I prefer to see classical ballet, but I can enjoy modern things too. I think Ashton's La Fille has a charm all its own totally different from the wonderful Gorsky one that Cristian introduced me to. I like both for different reasons, but to each his own!
Posted 21 July 2012 - 12:15 PM
Watching the clip of the two Lise variations I far prefer the Ashton one, as it seems to fit the character of Lise better in that version.
The other one is just a big show off of steps, with very little expression or portrayal of the person. The audiences in the UK love this ballet, not just the funny bits, but the whole thing. It was always completly sold out at The Opera House and on tour .And was rewarded by many curtain calls every time. It is still loved in it's original form today. as one of Sir Frederick Ashton's masterpieces.
I really love this ballet myself, having been there at the time it was created, by Sir Fred, I think the orchestration is really lovely and fits the storyline perfectly. From the amusing chickens dance to the final Pas de deux it is brilliant. Something you can take a child to see,or for an adult audience who can relax, and enjoy a bit of light hearted fun, albeit technically challenging.. I am so glad Paris Opera Ballet are dancing it, but whether they can achieve the overall character of it I do not know, as I have not as yet seen them dance it. So it is something to go into my plans for another trip to Paris.
Posted 21 July 2012 - 01:23 PM
The other one is just a big show off of steps, with very little expression or portrayal of the person.
Petipa, Gorsky and Nijinska being guilty as charged for it..!
I enjoy lightness for sure, and cute pantomime and maypoles-(many SL productions has them), but at one point of the soiree give me amazing, hard, solid ballet technique to go along with it-(just as with Giselle), so that dancers, both male and female, can be challenged in both, artistically and technically , ways for many more years to come. (Hi Mr. Petipa! )
Posted 21 July 2012 - 02:38 PM
Posted 21 July 2012 - 03:22 PM
Most dancers who perform the role of Ashton's Lise will tell you that it is very, very, hard and requires a really strong classical technique.
Let me add though that I doubt that Ashton would sanction the overplaying of the comic and travesty roles which one sees in his ballets today.
Posted 21 July 2012 - 06:47 PM
The key to this is that we tend to not like a different version of what we have grown up with and know well.
This is why nobody is happy when a movie comes out based on his/her favorite novel. The story we have in our heads is vivid, and nobody can put it on screen the way we think it should be created. 95% of people watching a movie version of a novel are going to be very disappointed. The new version is always going to seem like sacrilege.
It all depends on what we knew first.
I have watched both Ashton's and Gorsky's versions recently and love them both for different reasons, but that is because I am not invested emotionally in one above the other (did not grow up seeing one that touched my soul). But someone who has grown up watching one or the other is going to think the one he did not grow up with is "wrong" (for lack of a better word). It makes sense.
People like what they know and aren't usually thrilled by new versions. I'm not saying that is good or bad. It is just human nature.
Posted 21 July 2012 - 10:05 PM
And that's the reason I could never come to terms with "Dances at a Gathering" ...
And that could also be the problem...the fact that I essentially see "Fille Mal Gardee"-(Petipa/NijinskaHertel) as a French product with a Russian gloss...
Posted 22 July 2012 - 12:19 AM
In general, Ashton's choreography may look simple but is fiendishly difficult to do well. Fille, IMHO, contains some of the most sublime choreography ever created. Ashton also has the ability to make you really care about the characters he has created. When you see Fille done well, you come out of the theatre on a cloud of euphoria!
As my geographic knowledge of the US is atrocious, I don't know the feasibility of you going to see Sarasota Ballet. Looking at their latest season, Iain Webb is keeping the Ashton flame alive in the US. Given his and his wife's background I am sure the productions are impeccable.
I saw POB do Fille a couple of years ago and enjoyed them very much although, in places I thought they struggled with the fiendishly fast footwork for Colas and, indeed, some of the lifts we Brits take for granted (particularly in the Fanny Essler pdd). I am sure they have sorted that now.
Christian, please don't ever review Two Pigeons!!!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: