NYCB to Expand Jewels with Sapphires
#1
Posted 01 April 2012 - 10:49 AM
Since you need to get thru the paywall to see the article, here's the summary. Sapphires will be a tribute to August Bournonville. Peter Martins will choreograph the ballet to a comissioned score by the Danish composer Louise Alenius based on Balanchine's blueprint of the ballet discovered at NYCB archive. The expanded Jewels will premier during the spring 2013 season with a completely new sets and costumes.
Sapphires will be performed after the first intermission, the order of the new Jewels will be Emeralds - intermission - Sapphires - pause - Rubies - intermission - Diamonds. I don't have much confidents in Martines, if Sapphires turns out to be a dud, it is hard to avoid if you don't want to miss Rubies.
Althought Balanchine Trust owns the rights to Jewels and it objects to the tinkering of the ballet, the Trust does not own the rights to the word "jewels", and as long as NYCB performs the original 3 sections to the Trust's standard, there is not much the Trust can do to stop NYCB calling the expanded Jewels "Jewels".
#2
Posted 01 April 2012 - 10:56 AM
mussel, on 01 April 2012 - 10:49 AM, said:
Since you need to get thru the paywall to see the article, here's the summary. Sapphires will be a tribute to August Bournonville. Peter Martins will choreograph the ballet to a comissioned score by the Danish composer Louise Alenius based on Balanchine's blueprint of the ballet discovered at NYCB archive. The expanded Jewels will premier during the spring 2013 season with a completely new sets and costumes.
Sapphires will be performed after the first intermission, the order of the new Jewels will be Emeralds - intermission - Sapphires - pause - Rubies - intermission - Diamonds. I don't have much confidents in Martines, if Sapphires turns out to be a dud, it is hard to avoid if you don't want to miss Rubies.
Althought Balanchine Trust owns the rights to Jewels and it objects to the tinkering of the ballet, the Trust does not own the rights to the word "jewels", and as long as NYCB performs the original 3 sections to the Trust's standard, there is not much the Trust can do to stop NYCB calling the expanded Jewels "Jewels".
I love a good April Fool's. Well done (he said, hoping against hope that this isn't true...)!
#3
Posted 01 April 2012 - 11:22 AM
#4
Posted 01 April 2012 - 12:29 PM
#6
Posted 01 April 2012 - 02:14 PM
#7
Posted 01 April 2012 - 07:50 PM
LiLing, on 01 April 2012 - 02:14 PM, said:
Me too...and because I don't know anything about all that stuff of rights and Trusts and whatever else, I admit having been foolished. Actually, if the rights issue would turned out to be just as the OP states, and Martins would come out with the idea, crazy as it is...would anyone here miss the Premiere, even if attending was a mere matter of curiosity...?
#8
Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:05 AM
#9
Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:28 AM
cubanmiamiboy, on 01 April 2012 - 07:50 PM, said:
Yes, if I was in New York I'd skip it for sure, presuming the Martins addition wouldn't be up to standard even of Diamonds, and not wanting to see the whole Balanchine work weakened by the insertion.
Thanks for the laugh, mussel.
#10
Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:37 AM
http://www.nytimes.c...ter-review.html
https://www.balletme...allet-notes/175
Quote
#11
Posted 02 April 2012 - 06:46 AM
California, on 02 April 2012 - 06:37 AM, said:
http://www.nytimes.c...ter-review.html
https://www.balletme...allet-notes/175
Quote
Thanks for the links! I've heard this said about blue many times, yet year after year companies all over the world do blue just fine in Balanchine's Serenade.
#12
Posted 02 April 2012 - 07:57 AM
My first thought reading this was that Hayden's spirit would be awakened by this news.
#13
Posted 02 April 2012 - 09:50 AM
#14
Posted 02 April 2012 - 09:54 AM
#15
Posted 23 July 2012 - 06:43 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



