Dancers/Performances that hold up over time
#16
Posted 06 February 2012 - 08:19 PM
#17
Posted 07 February 2012 - 02:51 PM
In terms of elevation, height, speed, and dynamic dancing, Plisetskaya's Kitri:
And this is still the most moving rendition I've ever seen:
#18
Posted 07 February 2012 - 06:16 PM
Kerry1968, on 05 February 2012 - 12:27 PM, said:
Indeed, Maximova does stand the test of time. And so does her husband, Vladimir Vasiliev. Technically, he was a dancer from another planet. Just watch his Basil, Spartacus and Mejnun for proof of that. But he was also an exceptionally gifted artist. Very musical, great stage presence, marvelous partner and lived his roles. A truly timeless dancer.
#19
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:19 PM
#20
Posted 07 February 2012 - 09:00 PM
As for ballet that does NOT hold up well, I think all those dram-ballet films made in the 1950's by the Soviets look funny today. All that melodramatic stomping, the poor turnout, the exaggerated acting, the hammer-and-sickel storylines ...
#21
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:52 AM
canbelto, on 07 February 2012 - 09:00 PM, said:
As for ballet that does NOT hold up well, I think all those dram-ballet films made in the 1950's by the Soviets look funny today. All that melodramatic stomping, the poor turnout, the exaggerated acting, the hammer-and-sickel storylines ...
I concur with your view on Alicia Alonso, however I think there are lots of events where we have to adjust our appreciation and make a journey towards experiencing other dancer’s realities and particularly their historical context.
I am always happy to take a broad view of many things that touch on the arts, as I find that if I adopt the narrow view, I am liable to miss and experience what others have readily found.
For some, I would think the only way to approach the 1950’s Soviet films is to adapt ones critical faculties to contextualise the genre in the manner that we would when approaching a early silent movie or seeing a Noh Drama for the first time. That is to say to measure it by its own standards.
The emergence of dram ballet and your perceived exaggeration of the acting contained in the films of this genre, can be approached in crossing the divide by relaxing ones held opinions of how ballet should be presented and to consider how other cultures chose at a point in history, to present their style of ballet for a particular audience. Being different to my mind makes it neither right or wrong.
The films in question were made to reach audiences that were outside the sophistication of a high cultural elite and of course politics was always the bottom line in the reality that was the USSR.
I particularly admire “The Fountains of Bakhchiserai,” “Romeo and Juliet” and “The Flames of Paris” and the sincerity and power of the performances are to my mind remarkable in any context.
I have sat in cinemas and in homes of seriously knowledgeable ballet friends watching such films for the first time and we were enthralled by the ability of the dancers to capture both the romanticism and the drama in such a vibrant full blooded manner, that their performances become thrilling.
Turn out is a product of mechanics and if a turned in line was expressive, I would not be too concerned. After all in dram ballets, we are not dealing with Petipa classicism.
#22
Posted 08 February 2012 - 08:26 AM
I know the larger point isn't addressed in that little story, but I have to admit everyone in the shop but the two girls was hysterical.
#23
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:06 AM
Giannina
#24
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:59 AM
#25
Posted 10 February 2012 - 02:20 AM
It has been very educational for me, and I am so sorry that I never got to see many of these performers live. It is so wonderful that we have the opportunity to have a tiny glimpse of what it must have been like through the snippets of film and video and of course the written memories.
I was lucky enough to have seen Nureyev and Fonteyn when I was a child/young teen, even being allowed to go backstage and meet them once (due to my father having once "known" Nureyev) and I was absolutely enthralled! What magic!
Leonid, I like your comments on the cultural and historical context when viewing these bits of performances; and of course so much is also a matter of "taste".
When I choreograph/direct for youths (not all ballet students, and most have never seen a dance peformance) I also tend to be quite dramatic in a rather "overdone" sense, as that is what the "non-initiated" to the art will likely understand and even be moved by.
It is perhaps as with very young babies; they must be exposed to light in order for their eyes to react and recognise light - same goes for sounds and soon after the different tones and inflections, making it easier or more difficult for the person to learn languages /dialects, etc. later.
(just musing here... ;) )
-d-
#26
Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:11 AM
#27
Posted 10 February 2012 - 04:28 PM
#28
Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:14 PM
Paul Parish, on 10 February 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
I really thought pointed feet in passe was pretty standard to ballet. I guess I was wrong (as were all my teachers at the Joffrey and SAB)
#29
Posted 11 February 2012 - 12:59 AM
aurora, on 10 February 2012 - 05:14 PM, said:
Paul Parish, on 10 February 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
I really thought pointed feet in passe was pretty standard to ballet. I guess I was wrong (as were all my teachers at the Joffrey and SAB)
Definitely NOT wrong...(and please, allow me to take the liberty to say so, even if I know nothing about what life in a ballet studio is and feels like). Yes, it is standard to ballet technique, but not enough to make a female ballet dancer a ballerina...
#30
Posted 11 February 2012 - 02:03 AM
cubanmiamiboy, on 11 February 2012 - 12:59 AM, said:
aurora, on 10 February 2012 - 05:14 PM, said:
Paul Parish, on 10 February 2012 - 04:28 PM, said:
I really thought pointed feet in passe was pretty standard to ballet. I guess I was wrong (as were all my teachers at the Joffrey and SAB)
Definitely NOT wrong...(and please, allow me to take the liberty to say so, even if I know nothing about what life in a ballet studio is and feels like). Yes, it is standard to ballet technique, but not enough to make a female ballet dancer a ballerina...
I never said it did.
I am in favor of artistry, and I do like many older dancers, including your darling Alonso.
I'm also not opposed to taking some liberties and believe in some personal expression. But when that expression makes your technique so blurred that it is completely beyond correct technique as in that clip (i was taken to task before for basing my opinion on a single clip, but that was being discussed, that clip as the quintessential version of this variation), I'm sorry but it looks bad to me.
I have absorbed what i guess are modern aesthetics enough that to me its just aesthetically displeasing. But really I don't think that is the issue because I *never* have an issue with Alonso's technique, for example.
If you lose all ability to do it properly just to do it that fast, you shouldn't be doing it that fast in my opinion. It doesn't have to be so slow that each passe is exact and sustained, there is something that is neither sloppy nor slow and boring or however you characterized the "modern way" (though watching say Osipova do it, I don't think that would be a fair assessment of her approach)
I much prefer Maximova in the second half of this clip:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



