NYCB Winter Season
Posted 18 January 2012 - 06:01 AM
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:32 AM
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:34 AM
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:39 AM
Posted 18 January 2012 - 11:52 AM
Mearns got the Karin role, and Reichlen got the Morris role.
Posted 19 January 2012 - 08:17 AM
Tombeau - I have never warmed to this ballet. I think it's because its static quality becomes repetitious. Its theme is friendship (if I'm not mistaken), the ensemble as a group of equal colleagues. Put a man and woman on stage, says Balanchine, and you have a story. Put 16 dancers on stage, all in the emotionally tepid realm of brother and sister, and you have no story. Friendship is not balletic material.
Tschaikovsky Pas de Deux - With Tiler Peck and Gonzalo Garcia, may I say Tiler was beautiful and fearless. Her leaps into fishdives were thrilling. Her technique flawless, and her femininity brought out by the choreography. (Often she is cast in roles that lack that quality.) I first saw this ballet in 1976 in Baltimore with (gasp!) Peter Martins and Lourdes Lopez.
Garcia is an interesting issue. I say issue, because he has all the bravura motions and poses, but his solo leaps lack height, so you are disappointed. You are led to expect from his showmanship that he'll bring down the house - and instead his technique is tepid. He was an excellent partner, though. I'd much rather have seen Veyette or even better, the brilliant de Luz.
Union Jack - I have rarely seen this ballet, maybe once or twice in my 30 year ballet-going career. It is fascinating, a totally anamoly in the Balanchine canon. Meaning it's unique, no other Balanchine ballet is anywhere like it. Obviously, his chance to see Scottish regiments marching (like Mendelssohn visiting the Hebrides) inspired him artistically. The combination of massed combinations on the stage was brilliant, fascinating. What intrigued me was the way each group of Scots regiments was led by a principal, yet the principal was almost indistinguishable from the supporting dancers. So I made a game of it - from mid-orchestra, could I recognize who the leader of the regiments was? Which principal stood out? Joaquin de Luz stood out from the moment he took the stage as leader of the Lennox regiment. He did nothing different than anything else - but his personality, his esprit, just the bounce in his march, captured the eye. He has watchability, in spades! I did not recognize Tyler Angle, but figured it was one of the Angle brothers. And it was both! Each led a regiment. I recognized Janie Taylor by her diminutive height (the costuming helped to conceal the dancers' identities!) and she led Dress MacDonald with spirit. MacDonald of Sleat was led by the eternal Wendy Whelan (long may she dance!). Maria Kowrowski as head of RCAF and Wrens was replaced by Tess Reichlen (though there was no announcement or program insert, it was only on the casting list in the lobby). [Thanks for the corrrection - I didn't recognize Maria.] After the military manoeuvers, a quick change to the Costermongers pas de deux, which was charming. Andrew Veyette, in spirit if not in physique, reminds me of Gene Kelly. He has real showmanship. His new wife, Meg Fairchild, was adorable, and succeeded in hitting that sweet spot called "not overdoing it". I loved the moment (too brief) when the two Pearly Princesses are pulled on stage by a donkey in a carriage. They danced their little hearts out. I was happy to see Callie Reiff cast as one of the Pearly Princesses as I have a personal connection twice removed to her. I was surprised to see she is still so small. I hope she is cast as the young Mabel (is that the role?) in Double Feature. Back to the Royal Navy and Wrens. More dancing happiness.
The Wrens who come out in leg-bearing shorts, reminded me of when I saw Suzanne Farrell leading the Wrens in the 1980's. Was she ever a knockout. No one had legs like hers. She was just physically blessed, along with a natural musicality and a thrilling technique. Who says no one is irreplaceable? A talent like Suzanne's is irreplaceable.
What is also irreplaceable is a seat in center orchestra at curtain time. There were many empty seats in center orchestra around me. I wonder how the new pricing policy will play out. It certainly discourages last minute ticket purchases - at $149? I got my tickets at a reduced price as a subscriber, along with two "free" vouchers for a performance of Midsummer. I benefited from having a clear view, as the seats in front of me were empty. But the less expensive seats on the far sides were full. They even seem to have donated seats on the far side to minority children, a nice gesture.
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:37 AM
Although Tiler Peck was great in Tchai pas, I preferred the Bouder/Veyette pairing on Tuesday -- especially their thrilling fish dives. Who Cares? on Tuesday was one of the best I've seen -- Robbie Fairchild owns the male role, and the Man I Love Duet was spellbinding. No-one can do the turning role like Tess R., either -- her alternating single and double fouettes were so beautiful and controlled! Agree that Sara M. was miscast in the third role.
Tombeau was wonderful both nights -- the inventiveness and intricacy of the groupings is beautiful, especially from above.
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:28 AM
That really is generous if that is the case.
Is that an assumption just based on the fact you saw a bunch of non-white children in the orchestra? That they must be there for free?
Posted 19 January 2012 - 10:48 AM
Mearn's isn't really a turner, is she? I think she'd be wonderful in Embraceable You, but would struggle with My One and Only. It's hard, even for natural turners.
Posted 19 January 2012 - 12:33 PM
Posted 19 January 2012 - 05:28 PM
As others have said R. Fairchild and Tiler Peck were the highlights of Who Cares. I prefer a more stacatto dancer than Mearns for her role. Reichlen looked to me like she was still working out some of the kinks. Never-the-less I enjoyed both performances. Also Amanda Hankes was outstanding through-out, particularly in S'Wonderful
A word about tickets. I went to the Atrium that evening and bought a 4th ring seat for $30, center of row C. It was listed as a 50% discount. When I got there rows A & B were mostly filled and row C was filled in the center, The sides of row C and everything above row C was empty. If you go to the NYCB website 4th ring is "unavailable" and it appears that if it was available a ticket would be $55. I'm not complaining but it seems odd. I live and work about 20 blocks from the atrium so I guess I'll be trying my luck again soon.
Posted 19 January 2012 - 06:26 PM
What is irreplaceable is a seat in center orchestra at curtain time. There were many empty seats in center orchestra around me. I wonder how the new pricing policy will play out. It certainly discourages last minute ticket purchases - at $149? I got my tickets at a reduced price as a subscriber, along with two "free" vouchers for a performance of Midsummer. I benefited from having a clear view, as the seats in front of me were empty. But the less expensive seats on the far sides were full. They even seem to have donated seats on the far side to minority children, a nice gesture.
I actually don't like sitting in center orchestra. The first and second ring offers a much better view of the formation of the corps de ballet, very important in Balanchine. Moreover, the stage from the orchestra seats often seems shallow and overly wide, while from the rings the whole stage looks better proportioned.
Posted 20 January 2012 - 07:37 AM
I just want to say that I, like so many Ballet Talk posters, am very confused and annoyed about the pricing this year and the lack of information (in my opinion) subscribers were given about price increases. I have a Sunday subscription. My seat is K3, which is center orchestra. During the 2010-2011 season, the price per ticket was $100. It was the same price (if you had a subscription) for all the orcestra seats. Last June or July or whenever it was, when I got my order form for the 2011-2012 seasons, I got a letter saying that the price per ticket for my seat was going up to $119 per ticket, since my seat was an extremely desired one, blah, blah, blah. Silly me, I naturally assumed all the orchestra seats for subscribers were going to be $119 per ticket. But when I switched a ticket and got seat K6, I saw the cost printed on the ticket was $103. Huh????? Three seats from the aisle is somehow worth $16 less than two seats from the aisle?? I then started looking into this further and found out there are orchestra seats that are much cheaper than $103. And the thing is you can sit all the way on the end in the David Koch Theatre and have a great view.
So when I get my order form for the 2012-2013 seasons, I'm getting a cheaper subscription. Was anyone aware of the diversity in prices when they ordered their subscriptions last year? Did I miss the fine print or something? I've been attending NYCB performances since 1980 and have had a subscription since 1996 or 1997 (At the moment I can't remember which one.)
Well, thanks for letting me vent about this. Oh, this is going to sound like a dumb question, but where is the promenade in the David Koch Theatre? I want to attend the 1:45pm talk on Sunday, and the NYCB website says it'll be held in the promenade.
Posted 20 January 2012 - 08:10 AM
I went last year and it was wonderful - the dancers were interviewed and they were so insightful and just lovely as individuals. This year, unfortunately, I am tethered to home waiting for Verizon guys to fix my computer! This process will take 4-6 hours!!! So Colleen, I am counting on you to report on the 1:45 panel discussion since I can't be there, and for other Ballet Talkatives as well. Oh, and you need a ticket, be sure to get one, free at the box office.
Posted 20 January 2012 - 09:29 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: