Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:26 PM
This is a company he used 40 years of his life to build and they're pushing him out this way? Is he guilty of some heinous crime?
I think we should give some sort award for hitting all the bases.
Makes me rather worried about how ABT is actually run that they aren't staying as far away from this as possible?
Every time someone pokes this story another ugly detail crawls out.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:16 AM
Posted 16 January 2012 - 05:23 AM
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:23 PM
What's really puzzling about this no-AD "flat" corporate model the business people seem to be bent on converting the company to is, who's actually going to choose the choreographers and "stagers" who prepare the ballets?
More seriously, can the same 33 dancers, say, serve the audience by mastering the range of styles to do justice to the range of repertory being tossed about? MCB or the Joffrey Ballet may give us a good time with Taylor's Funny Papers or Ashton's Cinderella, but the flavors are inauthentic compared to what we get from the dancers trained in those traditions.
One model for a ballet company is a restaurant run by a versatile, master chef, who offers a varied menu - the analogy offered in so many words by George Balanchine, long ago and far away. I doubt that Nahat is another Balanchine exactly, but I wonder whether San Jose is abandoning the restaurant in favor of a food court.
Posted 17 January 2012 - 12:53 AM
Posted 17 January 2012 - 05:06 AM
Posted 21 February 2012 - 02:40 PM
I wonder what the circumstancss around the relase were.
Posted 21 February 2012 - 02:53 PM
And don't forget the Joffrey company's experience with Rebekah Harkness.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: