Villella To Step Down from MCB
#31
Posted 09 February 2012 - 02:46 PM
#32
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:28 PM
#33
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:33 PM
cubanmiamiboy, on 09 February 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
I think the bigger question that MCB needs to worry about: will the Balanchine Trust continue to let them perform all those Balanchine ballets? If the licenses were contingent on Villella staging them or if they expire in the next few years, they could be in trouble...I haven't seen that discussed in any of the news accounts. Do any of the locals know what the story is on this?
#34
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:49 PM
#35
Posted 09 February 2012 - 05:43 PM
California, on 09 February 2012 - 03:33 PM, said:
cubanmiamiboy, on 09 February 2012 - 03:28 PM, said:
I think the bigger question that MCB needs to worry about: will the Balanchine Trust continue to let them perform all those Balanchine ballets? If the licenses were contingent on Villella staging them or if they expire in the next few years, they could be in trouble...I haven't seen that discussed in any of the news accounts. Do any of the locals know what the story is on this?
Never thought about that. I wonder if the board realizes that Miami City Ballet has such a high profile and reputation because it is a Balanchine company. Often boards are just full of wealthy people who only got into the arts for some social cache late in life once they made it in life.
#36
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:53 PM
#37
Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:17 PM
Jayne, on 09 February 2012 - 07:53 PM, said:
True, but there is the fact that Villella is one of not that many Balanchine dancers still active and passionate about Balanchine's choreographies purity AND physically capable enough to be there in the studio to oversee things at all times. I is also a plus that he lives in Miami full time. It would not be the same to get thru the whole process of bringing a stager from out of the city every time a ballet needs to be re-staged. Even if the stager does come, he/she wouldn't be, as Vllella, here all the time watching every single performance from the beginning to the end of the season.
#38
Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:25 AM
#39
Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:34 AM
#40
Posted 10 February 2012 - 08:19 AM
#41
Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:34 AM
I do like the New World Orchestra. It is a unique thing, b/c it is a school that also performs professionally. It filled the void. I have been to several performances and always been impressed.
So, yes, there are good things. I really shouldn't knock everything, but I do know that arts organizations struggle in Florida both financially and artistically. Miami is probably our largest and most cosmopolitan city, yet the arts don't even flourish there the way they do in NY or Chicago or SF. Of course, Miami is smaller...
It is truly a MIRACLE that Miami has such a ballet company. This is my main point. I don't think the board of MCB understands this. So many things have to come together: someone with a vision and people who follow that vision. Just money and donations does not make a great company. I hope the board of MCB understands this. I hate to buy into the "star system" but famous names associated with a project or company help to sell. If Villella's name is gone they better find an equally important name to replace him. That is my personal opinion.
#42
Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:50 AM
#43
Posted 10 February 2012 - 07:44 PM
#44
Posted 11 February 2012 - 02:00 PM
Quote
Of course she's going with him.
Quote
That's worrisome, too. Michael Kaiser is not everyone's guru, but "he's been there", and often points out that business methods fail to give the desired results in the arts.
As to staging the ballets, one of Villella's many virtues as an AD is his practice of bringing in "originators" of the roles or experienced dancers of them under Balanchine's eye to do that, who are credited in the program books, like Maria Calegari and Bart Cook, who staged two ballets on Program II just over, or Allegra Kent, Violette Verdy, Jean-Pierre Bonnefoux, and so on. (This work is then videotaped, he told us one evening in a pre-performance talk, and when they revive the ballet, they use that.) But owing to Peter Martins's having broken the chain, this supply of dancers will eventually run out.
#45
Posted 12 February 2012 - 12:27 PM
But commenting on some of the above posts:
- I don't see the Balanchine Trust issue to be an issue. Look at the many companies of arguably lesser rank currently performing Balanchine ballets. Typically, the Trust will assign a repetiteur to stage the ballet (and usually that's NOT Villella), and with the high quality of dancer at Miami, I imagine that no matter who is running the show, Balanchine is going to be one of the company's strengths for years to come. I'm not sure, by the way, that I would give Villella all the credit for bringing in those "originators" to stage the Balanchine works; it's just as likely that the Balanchine Trust is responsible for that. (There are a whole flock of former NYCB dancers who supplement their incomes nicely by staging Mr. B's ballets all over the world - you do have to give the Trust credit for that and for making genuine efforts to preserve and promote the dances it's responsible for curating).
- The well-received series of performances over the summer in Paris did not come without great expense. You don't simply pick up your company and take it on the road for a month in an expensive European capital for free. I've not seen any figures on whether the company made or lost money on those shows. So the unanswered question there is whether this has contributed to whatever financial difficulties the company may now be facing.
- To the point that much of the MCB audience consists of people from the northeast: how sustainable is that model? These snowbirds/retirees are an aging demographic, and for the company to focus its energies on courting an increasingly elderly group of supporters does not seem to be a strategy that will promote success in the long run. Meanwhile, there is a very large and growing group of full-time residents, many of whom are Hispanic, that the MCB has all but ignored. While the company was undeniably started and built on support from the north, for it to grow and thrive it may need to look to Florida and South America for its future. Presumably if Villella ever intended to do that, he would have started long ago.
- Assume that if Edward leaves the company, Linda will leave the school. I don't believe she teaches any classes, so it's safe to assume that a good administrator can be hired to replace her. Don't forget - she did not work for free. According to the 2009 MCB form 990 (publicly available for free at Guidestar.org) she was paid for her services (the 990 lists the amount, but I know some people are not comfortable with salaries being posted so I'll refrain from doing so).
- Let's also not forget that Villella is unusually well paid for someone in his position. According to the 2009 MCB form 990 the amount he was paid in 2009 represented about 2.7% of the MCB's total expenditures (again, I'm refraining from posting salaries). While that doesn't seem like a lot, compare for the same year Peter Boal at PNB (1.3% of PNB's expenditures, which were greater than Miami's) and Peter Martins at NYCB (1.07% of NYCB's expenditures, which were almost double PNB's and Miami's put together). Put another way, Villella's pay was about half of Martins's; while MCB's expenditures were about one-fifth of NYCB's. My point is that a new AD would probably cost the company less. Depending on what that person brings to the table in terms of idea, continuity, management skills, and fund raising ability, the net benefit could be quite positive.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



