Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Ethan Stiefel to withdraw from ABT Met season 2011 performances


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#16 ksk04

ksk04

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 483 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 10:40 AM

Yes,indeed Amy - I had the same recollection about Bolle's early departure last year. I'm sorry to say it left me with a bad impression of him and wondering about his commitment to ABT. After all Gomes and Hallberg can't be expected to cover all of these kinds of absences without risking injury to themselves.



Yes, I think this is the part that bugs me. Gomes and Hallberg end up doing the heavy lifting in these situations because it's hard to replace someone with the "starpower" of Stiefel with say...Hammoudi or Radetsky or any other number of the guys who should be getting chances at stuff like this with the exit of many of ABT's men (especially when Stiefel was due to partner some of the flashy guests this season--I doubt Cojocaru is popping over to partner a corps dancer in his debut). Gomes and Hallberg are the safe choices...they are tall, popular, excellent, dance the whole rep and partner a number of the women well, but it puts an unfair burden on them when these hasty, weird exits occur.

What abatt noted about Corella seems absolutely true in this case, unfortunately. (Also the part about poor Stella, it's just cruel)

#17 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,407 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 12:24 PM

Stiefel gave a month's notice for the first performance, now cast with Stearns, and Hallberg gets one extra performance, while Gomes gets two. I don't know if Hallberg and/or Gomes are in the New Wheeldon or New Ratmansky; currently Hallberg is listed for opening night, the extra Don Q on 21 May, and then again for 28 May "Giselle". Gomes has two "Cinderella"s the week before his substitute "Swan Lake" on 29 June and the Saturday matinee following, and he has a second "Sleeping Beauty" four days after what was scheduled as his last performance, i.e., two performances in the last two weeks of the season instead of one.

Stiefel was already on the "if" list, with the aforementioned Careno (retiring), Corella, and Beloserkovsky dancing infrequently, if not at all. The lack of depth of principal men at ABT was hardly an unknown unknown. Given how quickly ABT responded, either they knew Stiefel would not perform before the announcement and were ready, or they had a plan B, given how dodgy his knee has been and how little time he's given the company.

#18 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 01:59 PM

ABT seems to put up with a lot of absences by Stiefel related to his other job, but at the same time Angel Corella has been frozen out of ABT because of his other responsibilities with his own company.

Oh? ABT has "frozen out" Corella? That seems highly presumptive. Maybe one performance was all that he, Corella, could fit in.

Changing topics slightly, I think its callous for ABT to schedule Stella as Myrta in the performance where Hee Seo will be dancing Giselle w. Hallberg. Of course, Stella was scheduled to do Giselle for 2 years with Hallberg, but it never happened due to Stella's injuries. From all appearances, Hee Seo seems to be prone to injuries herself. Why not give Stella the chance she has earned and let her do Giselle? If not, why rub her nose in it by casting her as Myrta in the Hee Seo Giselle?

I'm not sure the Powers were "rubbing her nose in it" which implies that they were intentionally out to hurt her, but I do agree that casting her as Myrtha to a new Giselle who "jumped the line" was very insensitive.

#19 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,807 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 04:06 PM

I'm not being presumptive. My conclusion is based on Corella's previous interviews in the press, particularly last year when his company came for a visit to City Center. Corella has stated that Kevin McKenzie does not have room for him on the schedule. Corella attributed this last season to the fact that Corella Ballet was performing in New York, and McKenzie may have felt that the audience would be maxed-out on seeing Corella. If we are to believe Corella, he has been eager to perform more at ABT, but McKenzie has not been willing to give him more performances. Granted, we have never heard from McKenzie on this issue.

#20 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 07:13 PM

I'm not being presumptive. My conclusion is based on Corella's previous interviews in the press, particularly last year when his company came for a visit to City Center. Corella has stated that Kevin McKenzie does not have room for him on the schedule. ...

Thank you for clarifying, abatt. I missed those interviews. :dunno:

#21 4mrdncr

4mrdncr

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 670 posts

Posted 24 April 2011 - 08:33 PM

I'm not being presumptive. My conclusion is based on Corella's previous interviews in the press, particularly last year when his company came for a visit to City Center. Corella has stated that Kevin McKenzie does not have room for him on the schedule. ...

Thank you for clarifying, abatt. I missed those interviews. :dunno:


abatt is correct. I read those interviews, I still have them, and can supply the publication and dates if necessary. I am not sure if the same situation applies now. Last year, there was space in the summer schedule of CBCL to accomodate any planned ABT performances, but this year, the schedule is tighter. Case in point: ABT opening night gala occurs between two scheduled CBCL tour dates in New Orleans and Seattle.

#22 Ambonnay

Ambonnay

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts

Posted 26 April 2011 - 05:48 AM

I think I might have (?) posted the key excerpts from those interviews on this board somewhere, but I unfortunately don't have the time to search to verify that. abatt is right in my book, too.

#23 spinning2night

spinning2night

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 103 posts

Posted 19 May 2011 - 09:25 PM

In regards to Corella, he was definitely "frozen out" of the schedule last year. My understanding is that in the 2009 MET season, Corella was overcommitted (I remember reading about him flying to NY for an ABT performance only to hop on a plane to perform with his company the next night). Then in the 2010 MET season, he tried to cut down his commitments with his company so he could be in NYC for ABT, but McKenzie did not put him in the schedule. As for this season, Corella's company has been doing a lot of big tours and performances to up their presence (they are currently in WA state). I suspect that Corella may have put his company first his year as tour planning is done at least a year in advance, and he's made himself available for the MET season the best he could (at least Corella Ballet was in NYC in the fall). That being said, I hope that starting next season, ABT and Corella work out a better balance especially since as many others have mentioned, he's needed in the rotation.

Back to Stiefel, I definitely think that ABT is maintaining a relationship with him b/c of Gillian. That being said, I can't think of a dancer who's been flakier, for various reasons for difference commitments, in the past 5 years than Stiefel (injuries I can understand, although Ethan seems to be much more prone to them than others - perhaps due to how little time he has to actually spend dancing/rehearsing). His new relationship with New Zealand certainly complicates things as Gillian is slated to be a guest artist quite a bit, AND it seems like Ethan has managed to throw a wrench into the picture too...I know we shouldn't be focusing on dancers' personal lives on this board, but seeing as they sometimes affect their professional live...he did (finally) propose to Gillian on Monday night at the Gala (link here)...which means that it appears as though Gillian and Ethan will really have to treated as "one unit" now. I'm intrigued to see how long Ethan commits to New Zealand and what Gillian chooses to do. Losing either principal on a more permanent basis will be detrimental for ABT, especially Gillian, and I'd hate to see it come to that.

#24 Marga

Marga

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,022 posts

Posted 20 May 2011 - 01:29 AM

I know we shouldn't be focusing on dancers' personal lives on this board, but seeing as they sometimes affect their professional live...he did (finally) propose to Gillian on Monday night at the Gala (link here)...which means that it appears as though Gillian and Ethan will really have to treated as "one unit" now.

Having read that juicy tidbit myself the other day, I wondered if it meant that Gillian will now be going to New Zealand with Stiefel or whether they will be living far apart for awhile. Of course, an engagement isn't a marriage, but it does make one think about the future of both dancers and where that will be. Now, even more than before, they will probably want to be together most of the time. (sorry for the speculation)

#25 RUKen

RUKen

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 72 posts

Posted 20 May 2011 - 05:06 AM

I know we shouldn't be focusing on dancers' personal lives on this board, but seeing as they sometimes affect their professional live...he did (finally) propose to Gillian on Monday night at the Gala (link here)...which means that it appears as though Gillian and Ethan will really have to treated as "one unit" now.


Maybe... the article doesn't say that she accepted, only that she "got flustered when her boyfriend proposed to her seconds after she danced to Tchaikovsky."

#26 spinning2night

spinning2night

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 103 posts

Posted 20 May 2011 - 08:03 AM

Maybe... the article doesn't say that she accepted, only that she "got flustered when her boyfriend proposed to her seconds after she danced to Tchaikovsky."


According to Point Magazine's FB page, she said yes. They've also posted an incredibly cute photo of them...Gillian's face says it all

#27 FauxPas

FauxPas

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 524 posts

Posted 20 May 2011 - 08:37 AM

These press releases are usually very carefully worded to put things in a positive light for all concerned.

#28 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,407 posts

Posted 20 May 2011 - 09:02 AM

And sometimes a cigar is only a cigar ;)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):