Jose Manuel Carreno and the Feijoo sisters on Dancing with the Stars r
#1
Posted 12 April 2011 - 05:08 AM
http://www.realitytv...html#more-13568
I tried to create a link to the google article I found about this, but it didn't work. Anyway, at least I posted the website.
#2
Posted 12 April 2011 - 02:36 PM
#3
Posted 12 April 2011 - 05:42 PM
(Why did they costumed Carreno with that thing...?
Anyway...bravo for my three cubanitos..! (and great to see my beloved Lorna dancing again...
Edited to add: Something just ocurred to me. Could Carreno's strange costume had something to do with TV tight censorship...?
#4
Posted 12 April 2011 - 05:43 PM
!! Spoiler alert !!
Odile as Rothbart?
#5
Posted 12 April 2011 - 06:18 PM
#6
Posted 13 April 2011 - 06:36 AM
Love it or hate it, Black Swan has gotten ballet back on the map, in pop sectors. Even at the pre-performance chat of the Radchenko Swan Lake the other day, someone asked the touring group's ballet master if he had seen Black Swan & he said "Yes - it's funny!" He added that all Swan Lake performances on the tour had sold out and that the public always asks about similarities with Black Swan at these pre-perf chats.
#7
Posted 13 April 2011 - 08:34 AM
I doubt it, not if you consider what sprinters, wrestlers (the real ones), swimmers, divers, etc. wear these days. Not to mention ballroom dancers.Edited to add: Something just ocurred to me. Could Carreno's strange costume had something to do with TV tight censorship...?
#8
Posted 13 April 2011 - 09:06 AM
I'm really not sure of Carreno's "suit", and not liking the choreography and the changes they made on the characters, but wonderful technicians. All the silly things aside, it's good to see ballet on TV.
#10
Posted 13 April 2011 - 10:22 AM
#11
Posted 13 April 2011 - 04:39 PM
That was about as weird as to be expected, but good that everyone was on TV. I wonder, if given an extra 30 seconds, how many more partnered grand jetes they could have fit in!
#12
Posted 13 April 2011 - 06:56 PM
#13
Posted 13 April 2011 - 08:38 PM
#14
Posted 14 April 2011 - 06:58 AM
#15
Posted 14 April 2011 - 12:24 PM
I was at the dentist yesterday and the dental assistant asked about my children. When I told her about my ballet dancer daughter, she said she had never seen ballet and wanted to know what plays my daughter was in. I told her they are called ballets and stand alone. She was as puzzled by this as she was about what a ballet company was.
From our erudite vantage points here on BT, we dissect every little thing about ballet and enjoy doing so. But DWTS is not Ballet Talk fodder in the same way a ballet company and its dancers are. Most people are probably like my dentist's assistant, as far as their knowledge or interest in ballet goes.
Judging by the horrible comments following the various articles about last year's ballet movie, most people don't even realize there is a hierarchy of ballet companies and that ABT resides on the top level. Being a top company's soloist is a huge achievement, much as conquering Hollywood is to a young actor. (Perhaps one should attempt to show a comparison of ballet companies and dancers akin to that of football, basketball, hockey, or baseball teams and players in order for the general population to get a clue.)
It gladdens me to see ballet so well treated on DWTS, despite the overhead or sideview video angles or choreographic liberties, or Carreno's costume, for that matter. I hope they will continue the trend in the future. (Monday night's Nutcracker-waltz was very cute, too. It gave the audience a little more context to what they usually hear as mall music at Christmas. Too bad it wasn't good enough to keep Sugar Ray in the running. He gave a great compliment to ballet, though, and that made me very happy!)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



