ABT in Moscow
#16
Posted 04 April 2011 - 10:32 PM
#17
Posted 05 April 2011 - 06:53 AM
atm711, on 04 April 2011 - 06:44 AM, said:
Boylston is a good counterfeit ballerina at this point - she's faking it but fakes it fairly convincingly: nerves evident (but few would't be); facial expressions often tense and forced ; as a whole her dancing is very cautious in this video - but cautious in order to look finished - it's evidently a trade off. She doesn't go through her back in arabesque, but finishes her poses neatly at the expense of that depth and real form in her steps; just as she doesn't go through her back deeply (but stays on balance and neat); in attitude she doesn't present a finished line in her working leg, front and back, doesn't bend it much, doesn't raise it. All of this enables her to keep in control, look composed. But far from being a corps dancer, she's yards, miles ahead of what you often see in this role at ABT, particularly Yuriko Kajiya - who often has been paired with Hallberg. However ATM you have the gold standards in your minds eye and I defer entirely to them. MP
#18
Posted 05 April 2011 - 06:56 AM
#19
Posted 05 April 2011 - 08:22 AM
#20
Posted 05 April 2011 - 09:15 AM
macnellie, on 05 April 2011 - 08:22 AM, said:
That's a bit of a loaded question, isn't it. As far as I know there is NO complete T&V video, at least in legal terms in general distribution. There are various fragments that are used by ballet companies in trailer videos promoting their seasons which I assume they have worked out with the Trust. And there is the section of it, pdd to the end, from the Balanchine celebration in the early 90s
http://www.amazon.co...02023447&sr=1-3
But that's all that's out there, legally.
Of course there are "non-licensed" versions, maybe the most widely held is the Baryshnikov/Kirkland version from the ABT telecast from the late 70s, but it doesn't officially exist.
#21
Posted 05 April 2011 - 01:31 PM
If it were telecast, a video made for personal use should not be wrongful. I am sure someone could lend/gift/bequeath it, as well. I think the position taken on these boards is a bit overstated. I am not an IP specialist, and I have not done the research recently, so I invite any corrections, but the scoldings I have received and seen given to others on this board, in this regard, are, with due respect, a bit misplaced.
#22
Posted 05 April 2011 - 04:10 PM
puppytreats, on 05 April 2011 - 01:31 PM, said:
If it were telecast, a video made for personal use should not be wrongful. I am sure someone could lend/gift/bequeath it, as well. I think the position taken on these boards is a bit overstated. I am not an IP specialist, and I have not done the research recently, so I invite any corrections, but the scoldings I have received and seen given to others on this board, in this regard, are, with due respect, a bit misplaced.
Our policy simple:
1. Links from YouTube and official sites are welcome, regardless of whether the video is available commercially or of the source.
2. News about commercially available videos for purchase or licensing and commercial and institutional copies available at/from institutions are welcome.
3. Listings (past and present) of performances broadcast on TV or in theaters are welcome.
4. No requests for or offers or "I haves" of non-commercial copies, regardless of how couched -- i.e. tape trading -- are allowed.
#23
Posted 05 April 2011 - 04:48 PM
richard53dog, on 05 April 2011 - 09:15 AM, said:
And there is the section of it, pdd to the end, from the Balanchine celebration in the early 90s
http://www.amazon.co...02023447&sr=1-3
But that's all that's out there, legally.
#24
Posted 05 April 2011 - 05:37 PM
#25
Posted 05 April 2011 - 06:16 PM
I've seen this ballet many, many times over maybe 35 years. Lane/Cornejo are the best ABT team at this time.
It is a really hard ballet and it is tempting to declare anyone who gets through a star.
#26
Posted 05 April 2011 - 06:21 PM
mira, on 05 April 2011 - 05:37 PM, said:
I'm not sure what you mean by equal in beauty. OK I am not the biggest Hallberg fan. I've seen him great in some things and not so good in others. But what do you mean by beauty? Is it face, instep, shape of the leg?
#27
Posted 05 April 2011 - 08:41 PM
#28
Posted 06 April 2011 - 05:54 AM
Marga, on 05 April 2011 - 08:41 PM, said:
Absolutely, I could not agree more---but it is not enough to tackle a true ballerina role---give her all the soloist variations out there (and there are some beauties); she needs to grow artistically. In promoting their dancers, it appears to me, ABT relies heavily on technique alone.
#29
Posted 06 April 2011 - 06:44 AM
edit: atm - just saw your reply - sorry to duplicate! :-)
#30
Posted 06 April 2011 - 07:09 AM
If a dancer is never given the opportunity to show the principal roles publicly until the role is "star" quality, the dancer cannot develop themselves as true artists. Dancers need to perform roles publicly to develop themselves. They need to be seen by their ballet masters, director and coaches on that stage in order to be advised as to how to look even better the next time. It can take many performances. This was Ms. Boylston's second performance of Theme and Variations, the first having been in Havana (up until now, still no footage). There is always room for growth in all dancers, however comparing a corps de ballet member who is just beginning the journey to a seasoned performer such as Farrell is a large step indeed. Ballet dancers of merit always have an interest too improve themselves. They are guided (sometimes misguided) by teachers, ballet masters, coaches, directors and of course their own instincts. Experience is the best teacher of all.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



