Bathilde, capricious or sweet lady?
#1
Posted 23 January 2011 - 10:37 AM
#2
Posted 23 January 2011 - 12:59 PM
The answer to your question depends a lot on the production she's in. Just from the blocking and the "lines" (the mime), she can be played either way. I personally care for a "nice" Bathilde (she's too good for a rover like Albrecht!) That's another thing that makes Giselle a great show. Even the supporting cast has meaty material. The details of movement we can trust to the ballet master!
#3
Posted 09 February 2012 - 10:59 AM
and by the way, has anyone ever wondered about the fact that though Giselle & Albrecht seem to know each other a long time she introduces him to her friends for what looks like the first time.
#4
Posted 09 February 2012 - 02:49 PM
#5
Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:24 PM
#6
Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:48 AM
#7
Posted 10 February 2012 - 03:05 PM
Bathilde is a condescending bitch of the nobility being the daughter of the Duke of Courland who plays out a charade of being interested in the peasant girl called Giselle as an amusement.
Interestingly, the name Giselle is derived from the Germanic word gisil meaning "hostage" or "pledge". The name may have originally been a descriptive nickname for a child given as a pledge to a foreign court.
Albrecht was often a surname but also the first name of a number of Dukes of Prussia, Wurtemberg etc.
Albrecht is a dastardly roué, who takes on a disguise pretending to be a peasant so that he can get into Giselle’s……………hum… good books. After all he is going to marry a social equal. He is definitely not a Romantic hero.
To Bathilde he dismisses her inquiry as to his clothes saying, “Oh no reason, I was just having a bit of fun”. The swine.
In the Act II Giselle’s power arising from her innocence and purity over powers the vengeful Willis and saves Albrecht. The stupid, sweet girl, but it does make the ballet something of a morality tale and everyone goes home moved and happy.
The ballet was first produced in 1841, but the famous “mad scene” was not introduced until Fanny Elsller first danced the role. See Galina Ulanova’s remarkable performance as Giselle http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q37KfEWznk where in the mad scene you can see that in the last moments before her death she is running away from the scene not into the arms of Albrecht who steps in her way to stop her.
Sometime ago Ari posted, “Leigh, you’ve touched on a problem I’ve had with Giselle for years now. The trouble, I think, is that ballerinas I’ve been seeing in the role have no conception of innocence. They confuse it with naïveté, which is NOT the same thing.”
I think Ulanova conveys innocence better than most.
#8
Posted 11 February 2012 - 09:58 AM
Most productions today seem to have Albrecht grabbing the sword before Giselle can commit suicide. Does she die of madness
- or of heart failure - or perhaps a combination of both.?
#9
Posted 11 February 2012 - 10:57 AM
To be sure, Gautier was part of the anti-clericalism of a frequently-revolutionary society, and showing Giselle's remains excluded from consecrated ground in the churchyard would be a good device to show an uncaring church. Perhaps her grave marker should be some sort of rustic cross, obviously crafted by her neighbors, showing their true compassion for her. Although Gautier may have been anti-clerical, he does not seem to have been an anti-theist. In several works, he indicates that the church gets in the way of the True Words of their religion, so that is one reason why this ballet can yet develop some passionate debates.
#10
Posted 11 February 2012 - 03:44 PM
Mel Johnson, on 11 February 2012 - 10:57 AM, said:
To be sure, Gautier was part of the anti-clericalism of a frequently-revolutionary society, and showing Giselle's remains excluded from consecrated ground in the churchyard would be a good device to show an uncaring church. Perhaps her grave marker should be some sort of rustic cross, obviously crafted by her neighbors, showing their true compassion for her. Although Gautier may have been anti-clerical, he does not seem to have been an anti-theist. In several works, he indicates that the church gets in the way of the True Words of their religion, so that is one reason why this ballet can yet develop some passionate debates.
What we are missing in this thread is a time line of who staged what where and when, who changed what where and when, who danced what where and when and for us seeing Giselle today the question is, are we all talking about the same ballet?
As to Gautier, he was never the only cook adding to the pot.
#11
Posted 12 February 2012 - 09:02 AM
today most productions have Hilarion grabbing the sword before Giselle can plunge it into her heart . Therefore no suicide. In which case there's no real need for Giselle's grave to be in "unhallowed" ground . Just something left over from original ?
#12
Posted 12 February 2012 - 10:10 AM
But as leonid says, we have to know what production is being followed, and from where. The Marius Petipa revival has confused matters somewhat, even if brother Lucien was the first Albrecht.
At any rate, we never see a priest around, so maybe the assumption is that she died without last rites, which at the time was also sufficient to keep you out of consecrated ground.
#13
Posted 12 February 2012 - 11:30 AM
So we can assume that Grisi stabbed herself in the original version. And the same source states that Giselle had a headstone with a cross.
#14
Posted 12 February 2012 - 12:21 PM
#15
Posted 12 February 2012 - 12:22 PM
cubanmiamiboy, on 12 February 2012 - 12:21 PM, said:
It is here...
http://balletalert.i...es-giselle-die/
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:


