Posted 29 November 2010 - 05:36 AM
The thread on which to discuss Macaulay's "Nutcracker Chronicles" reviews is here:
Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:12 AM
This critic is just a nasty person he enjoys bel I have read reviews just like this last one many times before completely off base he does have his favorites. I remember he was reviewing a nutcracker last year and mentioned a dancer who was not even dancing she was injured. He said she was much better in that role just to be nasty to the person who was dancing that part. He is obtuse and nasty and should be fired once and for all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[font="Arial Narrow"]Has anyone been to see the Nutcracker at NYCB yet? Here is a link to Alastair Macaulay's first review of this year's run. It's a nice review of Balanchine's production but at the end gets a little bit nasty toward the dancers..[/font].
Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:23 AM
Posted 29 November 2010 - 08:40 AM
In the future, if there's a specific review/article you wish to discuss, please post a new thread for each review. The same would apply to any other critic -- the point is to discuss the ARTICLE not smear or boost a particular writer.
The place to discuss articles is this forum, not on the specific company thread.
We have one thread to discuss Macaulay's "Nutcracker Chronicles" here:
Please discuss the project and reviews on that thread.
The appropriate topic for discussion in the NYCB forum is members reviews of the production.
[Admin beanie on]
General complaints about critics should go to their employers. Specific, well-reasoned criticsim in response to review or writings are encouraged. We will edit without notice when a post violates the courtesy rule or is not official news and has nothing to do with the writing.
[Admin beanie off]
I'm closing this topic.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):