Sandik, that is fascinating. It seems to me that Homans' book is the kind of historical "survey" that you can't get much out of unless you already know quite a lot. And have experienced quite a lot. It would be interesting to see what young ballet students might actually think of it.
As someone with a background in history, though not dance history, I am skeptical about how much is actually absorbed by young people from textbooks or classes based on a survey approach.
In my experience, learning often works best -- in the sense that the lightbulb turns on
For example, if students were being prepared for a production of Nutcracker or a competition pas de deux, that would be the optimal time to talk about historical context: music, discussion of various versions, classic performances, even the meaning and development of individual dances or passages which the students have either learned or are observing closely. You don't need a prefab textbook. Videos, photo copied material, etc., can be compiled easily by a good teacher.
To take an example from instrumental music, I learned far more by working on a few specific pieces of Mozart's easier chamber music with my classmates, and from a well-prepared class trip to see Cosi fan tutte at the Met, than from any lecture or book discussing, broadly, the works of Mozart.
Students who have obtained this kind of detailed knowledge -- learning directly related to doing -- are more likely, I've found, to seek out the larger context themselves. They can fill in the blanks. As they move into the larger world, and encounter people who DO know about Mozart, Petipa, Balanchine, Fokine, or whatever, they have personal experience that will motivate and enable them to absorb, retain, and benefit from this new knowledge.




