Jump to content


Sleeping Beauty


  • Please log in to reply
78 replies to this topic

#31 annamicro

annamicro

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 120 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 08:46 AM

I wondered how much rehearsal time Carreno & Cojocaru had. The pulled off some pretty spectacular stuff.


Cojocaru left directly from Milan to New York on June 9th, the day after her last performance of Ballet Imperial in La Scala, so, if they didn't meet before, they had little more than a week.
She said she was ready to enter in Sleeping Beauty mood and it seems she succeed!
I've been lucky to see her two performances with the Royal Ballet in Autumn, so nothing of unexpected in yours comments, anyway I'm really happy to read of her success. But, hey, don't love her too much: we NEED Alina on this side of the pond! :)

I'd see Cojocaru in anything. Have her dance the phonebook - I'm there.


I totally agree :wub:

#32 MakarovaFan

MakarovaFan

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 461 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 08:54 AM

I wondered how much rehearsal time Carreno & Cojocaru had. The pulled off some pretty spectacular stuff.


Cojocaru left directly from Milan to New York on June 9th, the day after her last performance of Ballet Imperial in La Scala, so, if they didn't meet before, they had little more than a week.
She said she was ready to enter in Sleeping Beauty mood and it seems she succeed!
I've been lucky to see her two performances with the Royal Ballet in Autumn, so nothing of unexpected in yours comments, anyway I'm really happy to read of her success. But, hey, don't love her too much: we NEED Alina on this side of the pond! :)

I'd see Cojocaru in anything. Have her dance the phonebook - I'm there.


I totally agree :wub:

After falling in love with her yesterday, I absolutely agree too. :wub:

#33 MakarovaFan

MakarovaFan

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 461 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 08:58 AM

During the intermission yesterday I heard 2 guys sitting near me dissing Alina's balances. They said that if any ballerina had toe boxes as big as hers they could hold long, steady balances too. It made my blood boil. :)

#34 Michael

Michael

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 777 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 10:18 AM

Didn't see yesterday but she has bunions and does habitually use beer can shoes. But so what; she's the best in the world in that role and no one can take the slightest thing away from her. MP

#35 Ceeszi

Ceeszi

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 01:53 PM

I was at last night's performance with Osipova/Hallberg/Wiles. I also attended Dvorovenko/Belotserkovsky/Riccetto.

First of all, I think that this season's production is a tremendous improvement over the version that I saw in 2007. The scenery does not look as cheap as it did three years ago and (thankfully) they did away with the shower curtain. Plus, Aurora's kingdom looked like there was a boom in population (another thing that bothered me three years ago). And it is more clear that the Prince actually destroys Carabosse. However, my one complaint is that they took out the dances for Puss and Boots and Red Riding Hood and the Wolf. Could someone recall - didn't the version three years ago have two intermissions? I could be wrong.

I am so glad to read the raves about Cojocaru. I had the pleasure of seeing her as Aurora when the Royal Ballet came to DC in the summer of 2006. She was exquisite!

I was thrilled with Saturday night's performance and I loved Osipova. I saw her in Don Quixote at the beginning of June. I agree that she was better in the first ballet, but I felt that she was radiant last night. Her Rose Adagio made me cry (as did Cojocaru's four years ago and Vishneva's three years ago). I know that this was her first time ever as Aurora and according to the NY Times, she was struggling with a sore throat (and the effects of the mugging!!), but I felt that she was still extraordinary. When she came out (what a spectacular entrance for a ballerina) her first series of leaps were unreal! The Rose Adagio was sure and steady if maybe a little on the safe side, as has been commented in previous posts. When Osipova was on stage I could not take my eyes off of her. I hope that she is a regular fixture with the ABT.

Hallberg was very good, but it seemed to me that he ran out of gas at the end. But he was the perfect partner and the Act III pas de deux was beautiful. Every fish dive was jaw dropping.

I preferred Maria Riccetto over Michele Wiles as the Lilac Fairy. Wiles was way too stiff and brought very little personality to the part. The most beautiful Lilac Fairy that I ever saw was Marianela Nunez with the Royal and I would have Yekaterina Kondaurova (who I saw back in February when the Mariinsky was in DC) in second. The Lilac Fairy should set the tone of "Hey! - Don't worry! - Everything is going to be OK!" I did not get that from Wiles at all and when I watched her with my opera glasses (I was in Family Circle last night) she usually had a very pained expression on her face.

But really - Tchaikovsky's music and the storyline - I loved it!

#36 Amy Reusch

Amy Reusch

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,770 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 02:16 PM

The port de bras is so important in this variation....I don't know if it is a fact or not, but an old Russian ballet teacher once told me that Aurora was telling a story with her arms---about how she was once small but now is grown.


Leonid, this is wonderful! One can almost see it and hear it in the music, it explains why the variation starts off so cloyingly sweet... as if she's describing being a tiny princess... and finishes brilliantly as the now fully grown princess. ...Cute to ravishing... Makes me wonder if once upon a time the steps & port de bras started lower and grew larger as they repeated...

#37 angelica

angelica

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 479 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 02:24 PM

"I preferred Maria Riccetto over Michele Wiles as the Lilac Fairy. Wiles was way too stiff and brought very little personality to the part. The most beautiful Lilac Fairy that I ever saw was Marianela Nunez with the Royal and I would have Yekaterina Kondaurova (who I saw back in February when the Mariinsky was in DC) in second. The Lilac Fairy should set the tone of "Hey! - Don't worry! - Everything is going to be OK!" I did not get that from Wiles at all and when I watched her with my opera glasses (I was in Family Circle last night) she usually had a very pained expression on her face."


I fell in love with Stella Abrera when I saw her dance the Lilac Fairy three (four?) years ago. After her first variation I said "She's going to be a principal next year," and bought a pair of her autographed pointe shoes. Although she wasn't promoted to principal the next year, she was scheduled to dance Giselle on a Wednesday matinee, for which I bought a special ticket. Then she was taken off the schedule because of her injury. I am absolutely thrilled that she is back. This season I saw her dance Mercedes in the Saturday night Don Q and thought she was exquisite--charming, seductive, with exquisite port de bras and technique. I hope ABT will do Giselle next season and that Stella can finally make her debut in the title role. angelica

#38 Raylene

Raylene

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 02:57 PM

I'd see Cojocaru in anything. Have her dance the phonebook - I'm there.[/quote]

I totally agree :)
[/quote]
After falling in love with her yesterday, I absolutely agree too. :wub:
[/quote]

Ditto. She reminds me so much of Fracci. Once you fall in love with Alina, you are hooked for good.

#39 California

California

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,516 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 03:25 PM

Alastair Macauley's review in the New York Times of both Cojocaru and Osipova was just posted Sunday afternoon:

http://www.nytimes.c...21sleeping.html

#40 vipa

vipa

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,071 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 03:55 PM

Alastair Macauley's review in the New York Times of both Cojocaru and Osipova was just posted Sunday afternoon:

http://www.nytimes.c...21sleeping.html



With all due respect to Mr. Macauley IMO he tends to go overboard with his praise of David Hallberg. Mr. Hallberg is a wonderful dancer who is also good looking, and who happens to possess unusually beautiful feet an legs, however these quotes are a little extreme: "But Mr. Hallberg’s was the one ideally classical performance of the whole day" and "More than either of Saturday’s ballerinas, he epitomized the ideal. He had only to point a foot, and it was an event of magnitude."

I think his criticism of Cojocaru's acting silly ( I was there) and found odd the time spent on what Osipova's performance could become in the future. I was not at the Osipova performance, and this review didn't give me much of a description.

#41 papeetepatrick

papeetepatrick

    Sapphire Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,486 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 04:31 PM

Wasn't there, but thought it an extremely balanced review, loves all the dancers, slight criticism of all of them. Although it's got his characteristic superlatives when he's got that many top dancers in a single day, it was also pretty subtle; he describes what Carreno does that Hallberg doesn't, that Aurora is not a 'jump role', that Cojocaru should think of her music more. I'd prefer his praise of Hallberg without the Harry Potter, that goes along with some of the 'children's 'n' Kittles' talk others have noted about the some of the tacky aspects of this production. Oh yes, I'd like to have seen either one of those events.

Thought I could remember the variation and see the port de bras leonid was talking about, but then realized I was hearing the Lilac Fairy music, so I guess I didn't picture the port de bras after all. Will have to check this out soon.

No other Aurora of my experience has acted in such affecting detail the different sensations that pass through her after pricking her finger on the spindle.


Didn't someone say that about Veronika Part on this thread? Gotta go look.

Yes they had done:

Part's delirium after pricking her finger was the most dramatic of any of the ballerinas so far - the work of a natural tragedienne.

Faux Pas had said this. Would be interested to hear viewers compare this scene after pricking the finger among all the ballerinas this week.

#42 aurora

aurora

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 676 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 04:40 PM

I think his criticism of Cojocaru's acting silly ( I was there) and found odd the time spent on what Osipova's performance could become in the future.


I respectfully disagree... at least regarding the first.
I think its clear I almost never (ahem) agree with Macaulay, so I hope it isn't taken as me just reiterating his points, but I have been, since the comments on the last two performances started coming in, trying to figure out how to reconcile my responses with those on this board.

I thought Alina's first act exquisite. Really wonderful. And I thoroughly enjoyed the rest of her performance and am glad I saw it of course, but am not in the raptures that everyone else here is. And it is for (I sense) the same reason that Macaulay was not. I did not feel the character developed. How many times has it been discussed here that the character in act III is a mature version of that character we meet in act I? To me she was the same flirtatious innocent sweet creature. She was charming, lovely, to be sure. But there was not the increased authority, maturity... I didn't sense a development between the three acts.

Osipova, whose act I was NOT as secure though it had incredible moments to it (and yes, she was visibly nervous, a surprising and actually rather charming thing in such a powerhouse), new to the role, gave me more of a clear delineation of the development of character.

Oddly, the one thing I disagreed with Macaulay on was a criticism of David, that his acting was less developed than Carrenos--Carreno gave me way less than David did. David brought life and passion to what is, in this version a pretty rough sketch of a character. (and generally I am of the school that Macaulay goes overboard on David--and I think he did here too at the end--although I do think David is pretty fantastic).

One other thing. I liked Michelle Wiles!
I feel odd saying it, both as everyone else has said how awful she was, and because I generally don't like her. I think if you read every comment I have ever written here, you would be hard pressed to find a nice thing I have ever said about her. But I thought she had real authority. I know everyone loves Stella.
I saw her (Stella) in this role twice--Weds with Part and Sat matinee. I thought she was more successful on the matinee. Partly she danced better. Partly she and Cojocaru were a better match--Part's own authority made Stella's lack of authority more glaring while Alina's sweetness was not a problem.
But although Stella danced well on both occasions, I did not believe for an instant she had the power to control the events, to banish Carabosse.
Wiles had authority. I believed she was controlling events. I wasn't looking through opera glasses and my seats aren't fabulous enough that I could see the grimaces referenced above, so I will have to take your word for it. But from where I sat, she looked serene, confident, and I believed she was powerful and in control. Stella doesn't make me think that. And as such, for a Lilac fairy, I don't care if I think she dances more beautifully than Wiles--it isn't sufficient for the role.

I think I have more to write about the two performances later, but for now, as no one has mentioned Riccetto as Florine in the afternoon... I thought she was lovely. very precise and truly lovely. I enjoyed her rendition of the variation very much.

#43 Amy Reusch

Amy Reusch

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,770 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 05:44 PM

The slide show is enlightening regarding the costume design for those of us who haven't seen this production. I do wish they had done something a little different on the Bluebird.

#44 Goldfish17

Goldfish17

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 56 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 07:10 PM

I attended Osipova/Hallberg/Wiles performance.

In my opinion, Natalia, although dazzling, is just not Aurora. This is not her role, and it was clear after few minutes of watching her dance.
But I can not wait to see her Juliette.

The rest of it has already been said - Hallberg was perfect Prince, Simkin and Lane were highlight of the evening, upgraded production is still painful to watch.

#45 bcash

bcash

    New Member

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 20 June 2010 - 08:59 PM

During the intermission yesterday I heard 2 guys sitting near me dissing Alina's balances. They said that if any ballerina had toe boxes as big as hers they could hold long, steady balances too. It made my blood boil. :mad:


RB dancers do seem to prefer those big toe boxes. They look particularly unflattering on Rojo.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):