Chekhov's The SeagullHow do you interpret it?
Posted 16 December 2009 - 09:33 PM
Specifically, is Konstantin a misunderstood genius or a fool. Does Nina have talent as an actress?
Posted 17 December 2009 - 07:18 PM
I didn't think Nina had great actress potential, myself, but I might change my mind if I read the play again, which I haven't done for some years. I've never seen it live.
Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:55 AM
I guess most of us have seen the late-60s film version with David Warner (Konstantine), Vanessa Redgrave (Nina) and Simone Signoret (unexpected casting for Arkadina, but tremendously moving in the way that a fish out of water draws our attention and sympathy). I also had the chance to see Eva Le Gallienne's Arkadina in New York, maybe 10 years before the film. She was a "great lady of the American theater" in her day. Unfortunately, I remember none of the other characters in that production.
Chekhov packs more into this play (in term of action, plot shifts, small personal arias, strangely unexplained surprises, etc.) than his other work. The story lacks the strong dramatic core that Cherry Orchard has. For me, it meanders. Much depends on whether you care about the characters and believe in them.
I guess your phrase "a play with comic and tragic elements" sums it up quite well. Nina is definitely an "actress" (of whom there are a geat many in life), but as for a stage career ....? Konstantin I just didn't care about. (Not as much as about the seagull.) My favorite characters come from the older generation: Arkadina and her brother Sorin, a small part, but lovely.
I'd love to hear more from those who know -- and appreciate -- this play better.
Posted 19 December 2009 - 01:36 AM
I was puzzled by the use of the word "comedy" in relation to The Seagull. But maybe it is the balancing of the comedic and tragic elements that is the key.
Thank you dirac and bart for responding. I am trying to reconcile the ballet with the play. I have read that Stanislavsky emphasized the darker elements. I think the ballet communicates the tragedy and emptiness of the characters' lives but doesn't capture the absurdities. For example at the end of the play Trepleff worries that his mother might be disturbed and upset if she hears Nina has been in the garden. And then he shoots himself.
Posted 21 December 2009 - 05:48 PM
Yes. Chekhov is walking that fine line.
Posted 21 December 2009 - 06:58 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: