By programme notes I meant the page long diatribes of pseudo intellectual artspeak McGregor favours,
I get a kick out of you, Simon.
Posted 25 June 2009 - 01:43 PM
By programme notes I meant the page long diatribes of pseudo intellectual artspeak McGregor favours,
Posted 26 June 2009 - 01:52 AM
And in truth since both the RB and POB dance those three acts so rarely nowadays, it doesn't really matter. Watson and Pennefather have enough technique to muddle through a fille. Bayadere, Don Q, Swan Lake, Coppelia etc defeats them but those ballets are one a season at most and that's why the Royal has recruited so many foreign virtuosos.
Posted 26 June 2009 - 03:02 AM
Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:30 AM
I know that 7-11! By Jefferson House?
Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:57 AM
Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:37 AM
Anyways, did no one see Manon last night, with my beloved Tamara? I so wish DC could have seen this with her and Cope.... his Act I solo is beautiful.
Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:44 AM
Posted 26 June 2009 - 08:50 PM
Posted 27 June 2009 - 01:52 AM
Makhateli is another one, he has what I call the "Orlando Bloom Effect" where even when he's performing you forget he's there.
McRae, is a technical dynamo, but I find his approach to dance and stage personality so pugnacious and overbearing that once you've stopped marvelling at his tricks there's not much else there - I feel he's another demi-caractere first soloist who has been promoted to prince because he's one of the few who has the technical armoury to cope with the principal rep.
Posted 27 June 2009 - 01:37 PM
Just returned from "Manon" with Alina Cojocaru and Johann Kobborg...
My goodness, what beautiful dancer-actors they are!...
This was my first time seeing Manon, and I feel about it the same way I feel about MacMillan's Romeo and Juliet--I'll only watch it with a really good cast...
Thankfully, the rest of the cast was up to the standard of Cojocaru and Kobborg, so we had a beautifully danced, finely acted performance that triumphed over the unfortunate choreography to produce a moving evening of theatre.
Posted 27 June 2009 - 05:54 PM
Posted 29 June 2009 - 08:31 AM
Posted 29 June 2009 - 09:21 AM
And:It looked much better than it did on its last visit, where it had become the Sylvie Guillem Show, or even in the days when an overwrought Marguerite Porter danced the ballerina role, rather than Katia, the adorable strawberry temptress. But it didn't look quite like itself, and the dancing (and casting) raised more identity questions. Why has the ballerina role become a tall girl part? Lynn Seymour, who created it, was closer to five feet tall than six, and her lines are in the choreography. Zenaida Yanowsky's dancing was beautifully soft, but her height made the pas de deux seem awkward at times, and it was difficult to imagine that she would stay in a marriage and house that bored her so.
As Beliaev, the young tutor who wreaks havoc in the unsuspecting family, Rupert Pennefather handled the pas de deux well, but had trouble with the solos, and did not create a clear character. Watching him, I learned more about Anthony Dowell (who created the role) than I had watching Dowell. How did Dowell show, from his entrance, that he unwittingly brought danger? (The audience laughed heartily at the loud chord that accompanies his entrance.) How did he establish that he was Kolia's tutor, because that wasn't clear, and Paul Kay's "Aw, shucks!" gesture when Beliaev left didn't help.
Posted 29 June 2009 - 09:06 PM
Posted 30 June 2009 - 02:17 AM
Why has the ballerina role become a tall girl part? Lynn Seymour, who created it, was closer to five feet tall than six, and her lines are in the choreography. Zenaida Yanowsky's dancing was beautifully soft, but her height made the pas de deux seem awkward at times, and it was difficult to imagine that she would stay in a marriage and house that bored her so.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users