Is there a level of too thin?
#1
Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:29 PM
#2
Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:36 PM
#3
Posted 23 February 2009 - 01:58 PM
Agreed that Albert is looking fitter this season, and it's definitely an improvement. Nilas Martins seems to be going the other way. And I wish Marcovici would lose some of the muscle bulk, especially as it makes him look like he has no neck (in the vein of an NFL linebacker).
#4
Posted 23 February 2009 - 02:33 PM
#5
Posted 23 February 2009 - 04:35 PM
Thank you!
Alexandra
#6
Posted 23 February 2009 - 05:56 PM
#7
Posted 23 February 2009 - 06:07 PM
I cannot even get past Wendy's body to enjoy her dancing. I cannot watch her in Swan Lake. The only time I have enjoyed her was in "After the Rain". I am certain it was because of 1) Jock Soto 2) the music 3) the choreography.
I have the opposite reaction. The costume in Swan Lake, in my opinion, is not as revealing as the body suit in After the Rain. Therefore, the weight (or lack thereof) of the dancer doesn't have as great an impact in Swan Lake.
#8
Posted 23 February 2009 - 06:19 PM
Some dancers are under so much pressure to be reed thin. I think even more so today than ever before. If you view tapes of ballets from 20 years ago, which was not so long ago, the ballet dancers seem heavier and THEY were considered very thin.
A relative of mine was glancing through my book on Pavlova by Keith Money and remarked, "She's a little heavy, isn't she?" And of course, Pavlova was considered excessively thin (as was Sarah Bernhardt, who looks fine to us today).
#9
Posted 23 February 2009 - 06:30 PM
#10
Posted 23 February 2009 - 06:39 PM
Some dancers are under so much pressure to be reed thin. I think even more so today than ever before. If you view tapes of ballets from 20 years ago, which was not so long ago, the ballet dancers seem heavier and THEY were considered very thin.
I actually have the opposite reaction, fairly adamantly. I would say the 80s-90s were the height of pressure for thinness in ballet. Looking at ABT at least there are many dancers, some with great success, who are not bone thin. No one comments (sorry to name names, but i mean NO offense) on the fact that Gillian Murphy has a womanly body. It is accepted. She is a beautiful dancer with a physique that enables her to achieve great technical feats. But in the late 80s-early 90s when Tina LeBlanc was a star with the Joffrey, reviewers routinely commented on the size of her breasts and how they were unballetic.
I would say the trend, on the whole, has been for the better.
#11
Posted 23 February 2009 - 07:19 PM
I actually have the opposite reaction, fairly adamantly. I would say the 80s-90s were the height of pressure for thinness in ballet. Looking at ABT at least there are many dancers, some with great success, who are not bone thin. No one comments (sorry to name names, but i mean NO offense) on the fact that Gillian Murphy has a womanly body. It is accepted. She is a beautiful dancer with a physique that enables her to achieve great technical feats. But in the late 80s-early 90s when Tina LeBlanc was a star with the Joffrey, reviewers routinely commented on the size of her breasts and how they were unballetic.
I would say the trend, on the whole, has been for the better.
I agree. I think the trend for thinner is better - no matter what, is in the past. I am not going to mention names, but there are many women in ABT & NYCB who have womanly bodies. Dancers now get lessons in nutrition and a lot more guidance in how to take care of themselves, than ever before.
I think that as the unitard ballet dawned, many women were misled into thinking skinnier was better. Some of the thinking was pressure coming from many directions, and some was self imposed. By self imposed, I mean there were dancers who thought "If only I were skinnier, I'd be a ballerina." Maybe this still exists to some degree, but I believe not as much as in the 80s-90. Even at that time there were many women who were stars, who were not super skinny - Suzanne Farrell, Cynthia Gregory, Martine Van Hamil.
#12
Posted 23 February 2009 - 08:02 PM
That may be an illusion of the medium. I've been watching ballet regularly in New York for over 35 years, and while there are individual exceptions, dancers in this city have never been thinner than they were in the '70s. In those days, there was little awareness of eating disorders, no appreciation of the great danger they posed. High profile cases like Karen Carpenter, Cherry Boone and Gelsey Kirkland helped raise awareness.Some dancers are under so much pressure to be reed thin. I think even more so today than ever before. If you view tapes of ballets from 20 years ago, which was not so long ago, the ballet dancers seem heavier and THEY were considered very thin.
Megan Johnson is still a teenager, and one with a slight frame. Few teenagers of either sex have filled out to their eventual adult form, even if it's a thin adult form.
#13
Posted 23 February 2009 - 08:03 PM
I can think of many more than just one to except (or are you just referring to the ballerinas as opposed to the soloists and corps members?)...... With one exception, the ballerinas at ABT do not seem to be excessively thin.
Despite lessons in nutrition and the saturation of public awareness in this area, far too many dancers still resort to the same old (harmful) methods of trying to keep weight off which get passed down generation to generation. New ideas are also invented and passed around in dressing rooms (for example, has anyone heard of eating toilet paper to attain a feeling of fullness? It's not only ballet students who do this.)Dancers now get lessons in nutrition and a lot more guidance in how to take care of themselves, than ever before.
..... there were dancers who thought "If only I were skinnier, I'd be a ballerina." Maybe this still exists to some degree, but I believe not as much as in the 80s-90.
Most dancers -- male and female (especially younger and newer dancers) -- still subscribe to the erroneous belief that "If only I were skinnier, etc....) I'd say this does not only exist to some degree, but to a major degree! Things are no better these days, with today's competition for spots in companies, than they were a decade or two ago. I only wish someone could prove me wrong.
#14
Posted 23 February 2009 - 08:52 PM
I think this is a topic well worth exploring -- but please keep it to the IDEA of being too thin rather than discussing particular dancers by name or implication. Often we forget that THE DANCERS READ THIS BOARD. We have a Forum version of the Golden Rule -- Post About Others as You Would have Others Post About You
There have been a couple of threads that are getting too personal, for this board, anyway, so the Moderators will be making reminders.
Thank you!
Alexandra
Thank you for the reminder Alexandra- I am in the Theatre community and have gone through similar things with message boards and people posting about myself and good friends. I also went to school with many NYCB ballerinas and was well aware of any body pressure and eating disorders. I meant no offense "naming names"- I was actually defending the dancers. I was going to add that I was glad that there seemed to be many more womanly bodies in ballet now- which is a relief to me.
Also, being in high school with the girls from SAB was enlightening about the demands of Ballet on the body- the dancers dance SO MUCH that many can't put on weight if they wanted to. When girls would quit, their bodies would completely transform and mature.
Sandi
#15
Posted 23 February 2009 - 09:58 PM
Moderaters please delete if you feel this is too personal..
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:


