PAMTGGDon't!
#46
Posted 01 November 2010 - 05:38 AM
I am in awe of the song-and-dance number. Those who were not around in the mid-50s may not really credit the extent to which Americans wanted to believe that they were living in a time of unprecedented Progress -- innovation, style, productive energy, and youth-enhancing freedom. "The forward look for 1956" combines show-biz with a remarkably positive and optimistic view of the role of science in human life. (As opposed to the view that science = atomic bombs and such.)
I can close my eyes now and still visualize all those big, shiny cars -- fins projecting into infinity; chrome reflecting the brilliant sunlight; mpg not even an issue in time of 20 cents a gallon premium gasoline -- on my suburban street. One dressed up to go to the car dealer. Signing the purchase papers was a ritual not unlike signing a marriage license. When the car was delivered one dressed up to have a family photo taken in front of the new vehicle, rather like a big game hunter posing with his rifle in front of a dead rhino.
PAMTTG, as I recall, lacked that essential optimism, that good-times-will-never-end feeling. There was a frantic quality, an underlying insecurity (Things CAN go Wrong) that is missing in the Chrysler commercial.
#47
Posted 01 November 2010 - 08:02 AM
#48
Posted 01 November 2010 - 09:23 AM
Helene, on 01 November 2010 - 08:02 AM, said:
And my mom had a Chrysler 1956 with the push buttons too...!
That car was in full function just until she left Cuba in 1998. She sold it just before leaving, and for what I've heard, it is still up and running in my hometown...
#49
Posted 16 November 2010 - 12:32 PM
the only dancers i recognize with some certainty are the two men holding the "flying" dancer aloft.
they are on the left, H. Conde and on the right R. Mairano. once again the costumes' lettering connected to the ballet's title is in evidence.
Attached Files
#50
Posted 04 December 2010 - 01:19 PM
To touch on a point raised earlier in this thread, I think that, to be relevant, any revival of PAMTGG that Peter Martins or Benjamin Millepied might make necessarily must include those current TSA security screening procedures that, of course, did not exist in 1972.
#51
Posted 04 December 2010 - 03:00 PM
melange, on 04 December 2010 - 01:19 PM, said:
It would have to be a full-length: Act I is where the dancers get to the theater two hours earlier than usual.
#52
Posted 04 December 2010 - 05:55 PM
#53
Posted 04 December 2010 - 06:05 PM
#54
Posted 05 December 2010 - 04:17 PM
#55
Posted 23 June 2012 - 03:36 AM
#56
Posted 23 June 2012 - 10:30 AM
Is there anything you can recall about the making of the work that seemed unusual, or specific? It's one of those ballets that make me curious, since I'll never see it.
#57
Posted 23 June 2012 - 10:38 AM
#58
Posted 23 June 2012 - 08:55 PM
Liz, on 23 June 2012 - 03:36 AM, said:
Third and last performance in New York, maybe? I thought it got two performances at Ravinia (north of Chicago, the Chicago Symphony's summer outdoor performing pavilion, where ballet went on for a week in August, IIRC). I remember seeing one or two, with the Lucite luggage we don't see in these images. Notice rg credits the photo to the Chicago Tribune, and notice the surface the dancers are on, big rectangular sheets of something. Plywood? Was your floor laid in sheets in New York, Liz?
(If you didn't make the Chicago tour, you may not have missed much. When NYCB tried to give the local premiere of Agon at Ravinia in 1957, I recall someone took such a hard fall the performance was stopped and they went on with something else after a considerable interval, to the apprehension and disappointment of my companion and myself. Like dancing on trampolines there? But 1971 was not 1957, of course.)
#59
Posted 24 June 2012 - 04:03 AM
sandik, on 23 June 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:
Is there anything you can recall about the making of the work that seemed unusual, or specific? It's one of those ballets that make me curious, since I'll never see it.
I remember thinking, as Mr B was choreographing PAMTGG, "What trash!" and I actually hated doing this ballet. But, as a corps member, it was my job to dance, without complaint. This was not the first piece of junk I had to dance, but it was the most disappointing because, after all, it was the great Balanchine ,and in my eyes he had just toppled off a huge pedestal. I also remember thinking that to Mr B, this ballet was a throwaway and even he didn't like it, but he was commissioned to do it... I Pan Am gave the company a million dollars to create it... that was a lot of money in 1971! I was thinking: what a waste!....
#60
Posted 24 June 2012 - 04:34 AM
Jack Reed, on 23 June 2012 - 08:55 PM, said:
Liz, on 23 June 2012 - 03:36 AM, said:
Third and last performance in New York, maybe? I thought it got two performances at Ravinia (north of Chicago, the Chicago Symphony's summer outdoor performing pavilion, where ballet went on for a week in August, IIRC). I remember seeing one or two, with the Lucite luggage we don't see in these images. Notice rg credits the photo to the Chicago Tribune, and notice the surface the dancers are on, big rectangular sheets of something. Plywood? Was your floor laid in sheets in New York, Liz?
(If you didn't make the Chicago tour, you may not have missed much. When NYCB tried to give the local premiere of Agon at Ravinia in 1957, I recall someone took such a hard fall the performance was stopped and they went on with something else after a considerable interval, to the apprehension and disappointment of my companion and myself. Like dancing on trampolines there? But 1971 was not 1957, of course.)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:




