PAMTGGDon't!
#16
Posted 23 July 2009 - 09:14 AM
#17
Posted 23 July 2009 - 11:22 AM
Farrell Fan, on Jul 23 2009, 01:14 PM, said:
#18
Posted 23 July 2009 - 11:44 AM
I couldn't find the photo online, so the following will have to do.
http://www.nycballet...tes/pamtagg.jpg
Was American styhle ever wierder or less attractive sense than in the late 60s-early 70s?
As for the wit and the social commentary of the piece: nothing is so cringe-making as looking at the "hip" as imagined and put on stage by the profoundly un-hip.
I actually remember the feeling of embarassment (for the dancers primarily) I felt when I got up from my seat at the end. It's the only work by Balanchine that I've ever felt that about. It's also the only Balanchine piece I have chosen sit out (remaining in the lobby) when it showed up on future programs.
Edited to add: Just had another flashback. It looked and felt like it was influenced by Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In, then at the top of its popularity. Not to mention a little nod to the middle-class urbanites of Sondheim's Company, which I believe was playing on Broadway at the same time..
#19
Posted 24 July 2009 - 01:05 AM
Quote
Here's some of the B.H. Haggin review of PAMTGG (and some of his Chopiniana thoughts) from the Summer 1972 Hudson Review. I generally find Haggin uneven, but here he does give a closer look to the work than the Time or the Barnes NYT accounts do:
Quote
Nor--to come to this year’s new productions--do I understand Balanchine’s staging of Fokine’s Chopiniana in the way he did. Ther occurs to me the sttement attributed to Hindemith--that music had a face; and if one didn’t like it one shouldn’t play it; but if one played it one shouldn’t change it...Chopiniana raised such questions: why Masso was assigned to a role which required her to do what she had clearly demonstrated in Diamonds and Don Quixote which she could not do; and why the role not given to the dancer who had repeatedly demonstrated in breathtaking fashion her ability to do the very thing Masso couldn’t do--Violet Verdy...
#20
Posted 25 July 2009 - 02:05 PM
#21
Posted 25 July 2009 - 06:17 PM
When I read what Haggin had to say, I thought this redesign, more than the casting, was what he was referring to, although I don't question his judgement about the casting either. But this is OT. He sure got more out of PAMTGG than I did, but he had a few decades on me, along with the abilities of a musician, and the analytical and descriptive way he wrote, as in this example, remind me how I learned from his writing. So, my thanks too, Quiggin!
#22
Posted 05 March 2010 - 10:43 PM
#23
Posted 06 March 2010 - 05:25 AM
I saw this thing in its first season while I was on leave from USAF service, and had just gotten back from a stint in Vietnam. A good thing, as I needed a good laugh.
#24
Posted 06 March 2010 - 10:44 AM
Mel Johnson, on Mar 6 2010, 02:25 PM, said:
And eventually we will all travel stark naked, all the better to make sure we aren't carrying 3.5 ounces of liquid soap.
#25
Posted 06 March 2010 - 10:57 AM
sandik, on Mar 6 2010, 10:44 AM, said:
Olympic security was great: laptops stayed in bags and went through xray, liquids were ignored except for personal water bottles, from which people were asked to take a drink, shoes stayed on, and coats need only be opened if they weren't put through xray. People did have to remove belts, though, which led to some interesting episodes when the belt-less had to hold out their arms to be wanded.
Food and beverages brought in were confiscated, but that was due to the "No outside food" rule, although in some venues, unopened water bottles and sealed food was allowed.
#26
Posted 06 March 2010 - 04:03 PM
Helene, on Mar 6 2010, 07:57 PM, said:
If only the airlines would take a lesson. The most frustrating thing is the inconsistency -- the rules change arbitrarily, they're different in different airports, and it's worth your life to find someone who can actually tell you what's allowed and what's forbidden.
#27
Posted 07 March 2010 - 03:24 AM
#29
Posted 08 March 2010 - 11:02 AM
sandik, on Mar 8 2010, 01:07 AM, said:
It would have to be a verbal ballet festival. We could probably now get some vivid descriptions of PAMTGG (since no one claims to remember any choreography) from some of the many members of the cast, who are still around and open to it. Perhaps a stalwart journalist or two could do a series of short, targeted interviews!
#30
Posted 08 March 2010 - 11:04 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



