Arch enhancers
#1
Posted 13 February 2009 - 06:45 PM
Personally, I think it's kind of sad that ballet now has such high standards of appearance that dancers wear these bulky pads. I can't imagine them being very comfortable, and I'm sure Osipova's feet would look fine without them. Are these becoming more and more common among professional dancers?
#2
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:10 PM
canbelto, on Feb 13 2009, 09:45 PM, said:
Personally, I think it's kind of sad that ballet now has such high standards of appearance that dancers wear these bulky pads. I can't imagine them being very comfortable, and I'm sure Osipova's feet would look fine without them. Are these becoming more and more common among professional dancers?
I don't know how common they are, but it seems silly to me. It is the flexibility and strength of the foot, and the line that can be created that matters, not the bump on top. I can't imagine that bulky pads would result in a dancer being cast in more ballets or being more loved by an audience. Perhaps it is a result of insecurity or misplaced priorities.
#3
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:12 PM
I, too, would be interested to know if this is a trend.
#4
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:14 PM
#5
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:33 PM
#6
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:38 PM
Alexandra, on Feb 13 2009, 10:33 PM, said:
I wish musicality would be the Next New Thing -- I guess I'm an old fogey.
#7
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:40 PM
#8
Posted 13 February 2009 - 07:58 PM
#9
Posted 13 February 2009 - 09:24 PM
I've never noticed this, and I've been paying a bit of attention to ladies' feet these days, as so few point fully when in motion. We have an epidemic of lazy toes, and I don't know what kind of enhancer can help that.
#10
Posted 14 February 2009 - 04:51 AM
Actually this is in no way an "arch enhancer." It's a kind of camouflage -- a diversion. They are trying to downplay a problem by exaggerating something else. "Small breasts? Try an artificial hump on your back. Everyone will look at that!"
I'm with vipa:
Quote
Possibly this is less obtrusive when worn by dancers, like those in canbelto's photos, who usually perform in huge theaters with the the audience seated far away. From close up, they give the impression of bandaging.
#11
Posted 14 February 2009 - 07:38 AM
I agree with carbro that especially with those dancers without much of an arch in their soles, it just looks like a huge bunion or bandage in the middle of the foot. I just wonder if ballet companies are now encouraging dancers to wear them.
#12
Posted 14 February 2009 - 09:06 AM
canbelto, on Feb 14 2009, 04:38 PM, said:
I agree with carbro that especially with those dancers without much of an arch in their soles, it just looks like a huge bunion or bandage in the middle of the foot. I just wonder if ballet companies are now encouraging dancers to wear them.
Her feet look all thick and swollen when they are flat on the floor in the Sylvia clip. It looks like there are some unattractive
side effects for the illusion of a greater degree of arch when her feet are pointed. I don't really like the effect.
#13
Posted 14 February 2009 - 07:59 PM
#14
Posted 14 February 2009 - 11:46 PM
#15
Posted 15 February 2009 - 12:06 AM
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



