Tanaquil Le ClercqQuery
#61
Posted 22 January 2013 - 05:04 AM
#62
Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:34 AM
(i believe the "Mary" for whom Le Clercq signed her photo was a woman named Mary Allen about whom i know little.)
Attached Files
#63
Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:24 AM
rg, on 22 January 2013 - 10:34 AM, said:
(i believe the "Mary" for whom Le Clercq signed her photo was a woman named Mary Allen about whom i know little.)
Great find, RG. "Mary Ellen Moylan"? Ha! Perhaps not, but one of my favorite Tanny portraits (in her La Valse costume) has the same dedication written on it:
#64
Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:49 AM
she was evidently close to a number of dancers a number of whom signed photos etc. for her.
i'm not sure if she was New Yorker or not...
#65
Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:58 AM
rg, on 22 January 2013 - 11:49 AM, said:
she was evidently close to a number of dancers a number of whom signed photos etc. for her.
i'm not sure if she was New Yorker or not...
I see - makes sense that some of these items were dispersed after an estate sale. It must have been a great collection. Publicity photos like the ones above used to be commonplace, but these days, it's next to impossible to find any such thing (unless in Russia). The digital age hasn't really helped out the fans in that respect - we may see lots of digital snapshots, but we don't have the rights to them, and most aren't of printable quality, if one happened to have access to a quality digital printer in the first place.
#66
Posted 23 January 2013 - 07:30 AM
pherank, on 22 January 2013 - 11:58 AM, said:
"makes sense" in that that's what usually happens, but unfortunate, to put it mildly; think of the experience a visitor to a public archive could have had seeing that collection intact!
But that "Sacred Love" picture takes me back: I saw a few performances of Illuminations at NYCB during my days in that audience, which began in earnest, to be sure, in 1973, 17 years after Le Clercq's tragic retirement, and I seem to recall the dancer in this role - its Sacred-white costume contrasting the darker colors of the costume for Profane Love, all quite elegant designs by Cecil Beaton - at one point lifted about shoulder high in a split and carried smoothly across to our left, as though in a coach. I imagine with her famous profile and the slightest raise of the head, Le Clercq might have brought just the right note of hauteur to this passage.
#67
Posted 23 January 2013 - 08:17 AM
Quiggin, on 21 January 2013 - 10:11 PM, said:
According to Antole Chujoy in The New York City Ballet, when NYCB visited London in 1950 Kirstein responded to an unsigned review in the Times by writing in part that
Quote
Quiggin, on 21 January 2013 - 10:11 PM, said:
A quick search finds a number of head portraits in oil on canvas and in brush and gray wash on paper, and also a disturbing oil Phenomena in which Magallanes is identified as the nude, but not the nude Kavanaugh seems to be referring to.
#68
Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:33 AM
kfw, on 23 January 2013 - 08:17 AM, said:
The New York Times consistently gave the Illuminations great reviews over its entire run – but always with the proviso that the original materials of Rimbaud's life were "violent, cruel, sordid," the poetry "of impenetrable obscurity," while the ballet transcended all that, being "of a rare and poetic beauty". The London Times, on the other hand, says the choreography itself was sordid.
From a New York Times report dated June 20, 1950 (KIrstein's unsigned one?):
Quote
“Serenade” ... was less entusiastically received but Stravinsky’s “Firebird” ... with Maria Tallchief, Balanchine’s wife ... got thunderous applause.
The critic The London Times didn’t agree with the audience’s appraisal of “Illuminations.” He thought the ballet ... a “study of decadance, chic and nasty” that involved Ashton in “the most violent and contorted chronography [typo?] he has yet assayed.”
Of “Firebird,” he wrote, it is but a “poor emaciated creature” ...
So I wonder if the anti-Rimbaud comments in the New York Times are both to deflect from, and at same time obliquely condemn, the homoerotic subtexts as that the Perry photos demonstrate, as well does the scene of Rimbaud at a pissoir – which Clive Barnes in 1967 curiously says was done in "most tactfully and in the best possible taste." John Martin in 1950 characterizes the Rimbaud of the ballet as a
Quote
#69
Posted 23 January 2013 - 02:40 PM
Quiggin, on 23 January 2013 - 10:33 AM, said:
Quote
Quote
Only 10 curtain calls? It's a shame it all went over so poorly. ;)
Any ballet that can create characters of such depth ("dark, turbulent, self-tortured, subcutaneously evil and unrelenting creature, for whom one felt, an almost protective warmth and sympathy") is worth a trip to the theater.
#70
Posted 23 January 2013 - 07:22 PM
rg, on 22 January 2013 - 11:49 AM, said:
she was evidently close to a number of dancers a number of whom signed photos etc. for her.
i'm not sure if she was New Yorker or not...
RG, I just wanted to mention that I ran into these images of the letter and envelope that accompanied Tanny's La Valse publicity shot shown earlier in the thread:


Pretty interesting! Love the mention of Lee (Miller) Penrose, whose biography I recently read. From the website of Thomas Oboe Lee:
http://home.comcast....autographs.html
#71
Posted 23 January 2013 - 08:17 PM

A short documentary with Tony Penrose
http://www.guardian....ler?INTCMP=SRCH
Sort of a Lee Miller anthology:
http://www.tumblr.co...gged/lee miller
#72
Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:15 PM
I do wonder how Tanny and Mary E. Allen came onto the subject of Lee Miller.
#73
Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:04 PM
Quote
But the war, and certainly her childhood rape and the loss of her extraordinary beauty, threw Miller into dark moods. She was, in many ways, tormented by her gleaming past.
http://www.nytimes.c...wanted=all&_r=0
That kind of odd cooking was chic in the 50s and 60, so it wasn't as if she had completely withdrawn. And her trauma – and what drew her to the surrealists – was probably way before Dachau, the horror of which she didn't shy away from.
Quote
http://www.huffingto..._b_1394637.html
Yes and it would be interesting how much Tanny and Mary E. knew about her past.
#74
Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:33 AM
Lynette H, on 22 January 2013 - 05:04 AM, said:
#75
Posted 24 January 2013 - 07:33 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:




