Fan Oral Histories of Ballet?
#1
Posted 21 November 2008 - 08:19 PM
I know that various foundations have produced oral histories by dancers, but what about from the fans' perspective? Have there been an attempt to gather stories from the fans? Granted, ballet fans comprise somewhat of a specialized population, but such a volume would be fascinating! Where are they hiding?
emi
(in her imaginary successful secret hero life _before_ she became a graduate student, emi had aspirations to being something of a hack writer)
#2
Posted 22 November 2008 - 02:54 PM
emilienne, on Nov 21 2008, 11:19 PM, said:
I know that various foundations have produced oral histories by dancers, but what about from the fans' perspective? Have there been an attempt to gather stories from the fans? Granted, ballet fans comprise somewhat of a specialized population, but such a volume would be fascinating! Where are they hiding?
I am a great admirer of oral history and am regrettably of an age, when I can recount what some now consider to be historical events.
When carrying out a study of oral history in an area which I thought I was reasonably well informed, I shamefacedly to this day remember being brought down to earth as if I was a
twelve year old, by a good number of octogenarian ladies, all of whom had been ballet dancers when younger and were participants in distant past events about which I was enquiring.
At the same time I also placed and advertisement in newspapers requesting memories of a particular person and many though not all recorded impressions that were vivid and powerfully personal. This for me, was confirmation of the importance of oral history as I was later able to speak to them at a tea-party I arranged..
I am sure a number of ballettalk contributors consider quite rightly that they are contributing to ballet history when they post and I personally keep a record of what to me are the most important, as an historical source.
PS
I wish another descriptive rather than fan (short for fanatic) could find universal usage when talking about a deep interest in a ‘high art’. In London among people I know, I find fan is now used in a pejorative sense to describe people who ‘love’ particular dancers rather than the art form. But then sometime, some of us are rather snobbish when we talk about ballet, because we deeply admire the form and are protective of its status as a "high art".
#3
Posted 22 November 2008 - 11:07 PM
Thanks for replying to my question. What I had in mind were more publicly available and more easily searchable resources. For example, there are invaluable resources here at BT, but it often requires that a person knows exactly what details they are looking for. Or, on the boards, knowing the identities of the best person when ask for reminiscences of, as an example, the Ballet Russes? Among regulars it's more obvious, but it's much harder for beginners when it's not apparently that the resource even exists.
I for one would love to catalogue the older BT posts to make the more informative among them more easily accessible.
emi
ps - I am all for finding an alternate term if a better one exists; but speaking as a member of a younger generation for whom the term 'fan' has long lost its pejorative connotations, it has served its purpose for the lack of something better. Otherwise I shudder to think of being forced to rely on deeply unhelpful sentences such as "I attend the ballet quite a lot, yes" or "Mr Balanchine was a fine choreographer" or even "hm, I think that last soviet lift in Corsaire may be verging on excess" in order to convey a depth of judgment or sentiment.
#4
Posted 23 November 2008 - 04:56 AM
The extensive oral histories of the French Revolution (relying on written sources, often collected at the time) or the Civil Rights movement (often relying on interviews) could be models for what you're talking about.What's needed is a focused set of questions (as leonid says), trained interviewers, and probably -- alas! -- a grant.
One problem with gathering oral history today is the enormity of the evidence. We are not as dependent on written accounts or the memories of octegenarians as historians are in the past. The internet has become a repository for so MUCH opinion and information (a great deal of it in the form of spur-of-the-moment thoughts) that no single individual could even make a dent. Most of this is ephemeral and, frankly, not worth dwelling on.
But there IS stuff worth preserving. emilienne, the archives of Ballet Talk are selective and focus on certain kinds of topics and a certain level of subject-matter only. I imagine that this is a matter of storage space. I hope that one of the technically-skilled Moderators can address your concerns on this.
We need some ideas.
#5
Posted 23 November 2008 - 05:45 AM
bart, on Nov 23 2008, 07:56 AM, said:
Now we're in my ballpark! I don't know of anything specific, but I can certainly ask our Field Services Bureau for guidance when I get to the "day job" tomorrow. Information about this kind of work (and a lot more) is what they deal in.
We've visited this topic before, not all that long ago:
Oral history
#6
Posted 23 November 2008 - 06:25 AM
http://www.to-the-po...rg/20050422.wmv
http://www.to-the-po...rg/20050624.wmv
#7
Posted 23 November 2008 - 06:56 AM
leonid, on Nov 22 2008, 05:54 PM, said:
The term, of course, is connoisseur! (Yet like emi, I embrace the term "fan.") And connoisseurs are vital to scholarship in many fields, including colonial American history, to name one (in addition to Bart's examples of the French Revolution and the American Civil Rights movement). Connoisseurs sometimes have the passion, the means, and the time to amass a viewing history that many scholars could only dream about experiencing. So taking oral histories is vital, I think, to preserve the centuries of viewing experience among all of the connoisseurs.
#8
Posted 23 November 2008 - 09:07 AM
As per the term, "balletomane" is the most popular in Havana-(in its spanish translation, "balletomano")
#9
Posted 23 November 2008 - 01:52 PM
cubanmiamiboy, on Nov 23 2008, 12:07 PM, said:
#10
Posted 23 November 2008 - 04:18 PM
carbro, on Nov 23 2008, 01:52 PM, said:
cubanmiamiboy, on Nov 23 2008, 12:07 PM, said:
#11
Posted 23 November 2008 - 05:59 PM
cubanmiamiboy, on Nov 23 2008, 07:18 PM, said:
#12
Posted 23 November 2008 - 06:58 PM
carbro, on Nov 23 2008, 05:59 PM, said:
cubanmiamiboy, on Nov 23 2008, 07:18 PM, said:
If there's something i truly enjoy from BT is atm711's posts with their so many sharp and wonderful reminiscences...(oral history, right...?)
#13
Posted 23 November 2008 - 07:07 PM
cubanmiamiboy, on Nov 23 2008, 09:58 PM, said:
But are these oral history? I've always thought of oral history as a response to interview. In other words, the speaker is responding to someone else's questions. Possibly atm711's blog belongs more in the category of "memoir."
Mel, you''re our expert on this. What's the correct use of the term?
#14
Posted 23 November 2008 - 07:28 PM
One of my projects involved Malcolm X (el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz), and people who recalled him. He left rather few written statements about his philosophy, his "autobiography" was ghosted with Alex Haley, but things seemed to take a dramatic turn after his hajj. His "Letter from Mecca" is a wellspring. People who had only known him before or only after the hajj sounded like they were talking about totally different people! People who had known him both before AND after saw (perhaps because they wanted to see that) a flowering from early promise. I learned the value of "non-evaluative listening" while I was on that project! ("I see! And then what happened?")
Whether anecdotal or journalistic, spoken or written, it's useful to historians to have ANY kind of primary material to work with!
#15
Posted 23 November 2008 - 08:41 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



