Jump to content


New York City Opera: trials and tribulations


  • You cannot reply to this topic
94 replies to this topic

#91 dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,819 posts

Posted 19 April 2012 - 11:36 AM

FromThe Wall Street Journal.

Quote

After huge budget cuts and a damaging labor fight, City Opera is on track this season to balance its budget for the first time since 2000. But it will be years before the company can expand its season to the eight or 10 annual productions it hopes to stage, officials said.

Hanging in there.

#92 Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,278 posts

Posted 19 April 2012 - 11:42 AM

It might have an appropriate niche with the current number of productions and the same repertory and size of budget.  There seems to be a bias for it to return to a model that didn't work.

#93 Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,278 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:55 AM

Alex Ross isn't impressed:  in a link Ray posted to the Met Ring discussion thread, Ross wrote:

Quote

Last month, having been priced out of Lincoln Center, the company decamped to the Brooklyn Academy of Music to present “La Traviata” and Rufus Wainwright’s “Prima Donna.” Neither show felt like a turnaround.

http://www.newyorker...s#ixzz1uUUYIQIP


Later in the review he writes in greater detail, concluding:

Quote

This has been the most dispiriting opera season since I began reviewing music in New York, twenty years ago. Although the economic crisis has taken its toll, the problem is less a lack of money than a lack of intellectual vitality. Both the Met and City Opera are committing the supreme operatic sin: they are thinking small.


#94 abatt

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,719 posts

Posted 29 April 2013 - 10:31 AM

I'm linking an article from the NY Times regarding the current health of NY City Opera.  The author posits that City Opera shoudl again make its permanent home  at NY City Center.  That is very ironic..  The reason that most visiting ballet companies had to book at City Center was because City Opera occupied the State Theater for 16 weeks per year.  Now many ballet companies have abandoned City Center in favor of the the State (Koch)  Theater, due to the vacancy left by City Opera's  abandonment of the venue.

http://www.nytimes.c....html?ref=music

#95 dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,819 posts

Posted 02 May 2013 - 04:00 PM

A quote from the article:

Quote

So where does this leave City Opera for the future? Mr. Steel made inspired choices of works and directors. All four shows were artistically strong. But because City Opera must rent space and build each production to order, it had to crowd its offerings into concentrated periods of two weeks each: the first two at the academy in February; the second two at City Center this month, for a total of just 16 performances.


The books are balanced, the article also says. So the company really is hanging in there, and a bit more than that. A home could only help.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

members, guests, anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: