Kennedy Center Season, October 8-12, 2008
Posted 14 September 2008 - 05:31 PM
October 8, 9, and 11 evenings, October 12 matinee.
Liebeslieder Walzer; Ragtime; Episodes (with Ballet Austin)
PROGRAM B --
October 10 and 11 matinee, October 12 evening.
"The Balanchine Couple" featuring narration by Suzanne and excerpts from:
Apollo, La Sonnambula "The Unanswered Question" from Ivesiana, La Valse,
Agon, Meditation, Pas de Mauresque from Don Quixote, Diamonds, Stars and
Posted 06 October 2008 - 04:51 PM
Posted 08 October 2008 - 08:10 PM
After intermission we had more familiar dancers, strangely enough, considering a number of them were from Ballet Austin. Farrell is a kind of sorceress, a mistress of white magic:
I've heard Stravinsky's Ragtime in one or another performance with his participation, and here the musical performance, by a small on-stage band, lacked some punch by comparison with those, but the dance (Elisabeth Holowchuk and Michael Cook, of TSFB) seemed another different time-flow experience. It runs 4-1/2 minutes still, yet there's an impossible amount of fun in this without cramming, rushing, or dragging -- here's another "world", a smaller one, but where time goes very differently from what we're used to.
Episodes, by contrast, seemed a more familiar planet, to me, if not to the attentive audience, which filled the main floor and was audibly with everything all evening if unsure when to applaud in Episodes.
Posted 08 October 2008 - 09:37 PM
.... Farrell is a kind of sorceress, a mistress of white magic....
Posted 09 October 2008 - 07:54 AM
I agree, RM Productions, I think they were, zoomed in and zoomed out to the waltz rhythm. What were they thinking? Interpretation, that's what! Reminds me of Stravinsky's remark about "interpretation" in musical performance: "What most people call interpretation I call bad manners," or somthing like that. Okay, I'm a frustrated television director -- for ballet -- and that's another topic, but your remark struck a nerve. It's best when they just show, and don't interpret. Still, it's good to "warm up". My off-air tape is packed away until I can be sure I have a vcr that won't damage it playing it...
I sat in the center of the orchestra, in row S, and found it only a little distant, and though the main floor is not as strongly raked as some theatres, I was not blocked.
Go again? You don't know me! I'm in for the run, I want to memorize these ballets, especially a performance of such quality; that's one way to deal with the video situation: memory. I'll be there for every performance.
And then there's the subtle or not so subtle differences from one performance to the next. (And hopefully, not so subtle: I hope the chandelier flies out of sight for the second section; the stars do come out. When the girls are on pointe, it's more aerial, "big"in the sense of infinity.)
Posted 09 October 2008 - 08:52 AM
Jack, thank you so much for your wonderfully evocative comments about opening night. I'll be there for both performances on Saturday and I can't wait.
While I'm at it – this seems as appropriate a place as any to direct a big thank you to the gentleman with whom I stood on line for 4 hours at City Center last month waiting to buy Fall for Dance tickets. The hours flew by as we exchanged our views on the current NY dance scene and when I told him that there was going to be so much ballet at CC in October that I wasn't planning to make my usual pilgrimage to see the Kirov/Mariinsky or head down to DC to catch the Farrell Ballet performances he looked at me like I had two heads and said something to the effect of "What are you crazy? How many more opportunities do you think you'll have to see Suzanne Farrell stage her favorite Balanchine pas de deux and give her thoughts on the Balanchine couple?" His words hit me like a thunderbolt and I bought tickets the next day. What was I thinking?
Posted 09 October 2008 - 12:40 PM
The RM productions are *occasionally* shown on German television (ZDF Theater). They showed La Valse/Valse Fantasie/Concerto Barocco back in March and April, but since then I don't think anything else has been scheduled.
Jack - have you been up to the balcony? I was feeling stingy (ah school payments) and bought a side balcony seat, but now I am strongly considering giving that up for an orchestra seat. I foolishly gave up a row N dead center orchestra for it. Sorry Ms Farrell.
I am going to both performances Sunday and would love to meet up with people before or after either performance. It will be exciting and perhaps highly uncomfortable, my favorite combination.
(Will be very *very* glad to see liebeslieder from a stationary perspective.)
(edited to include the correct quote from Mr Astaire. I can't remember exact words to save my life)
Posted 09 October 2008 - 12:59 PM
Words for every dance cinematographer to live -- and die -- by. Thanks for that, emilienne.
What did Mr Astaire once say? Either the camera dances, or I do [sic sic sic].
I once took some dance classes from Fred Kelly, Gene's brother, who noted that Fred Astaire invented a lens that allowed the camera to take long takes of the dancing catching the dancer's full figures, from head to toe. Hard to believe that before then, they weren't able to photograph so well. But dance lovers owe a great debt to Astaire not only for his supreme artistry but for his technological contribution.
Posted 09 October 2008 - 05:41 PM
Posted 09 October 2008 - 07:32 PM
Anyway, as I'm getting my feet back on the ground, I realized that although I've praised the Liebeslieder dancers, I've been remiss not to tell everybody who they are:
Natalia Magnicaballi Matthew Prescott
Bonnie Pickard Michael Cook
Erin Mahoney-Du Momchil Mladenov
Ashley Hubbard Runqiao Du
Actually, I typed that up earlier today but was unable to post. Since then, I've seen their second (Friday) performance, and from two rows closer. What a difference!
(I've not been in the balcony for some time, emilienne, and not having my notes about seats with me I can only recall that the first few rows of the balcony were better than the back of the orchestra. Certainly height usually helps at the same distance in any theatre, but row S, for example, is forward of the balcony. On the other hand, row N is closer than necessary for me and, at least in the previous version of the theatre, a bit low, so that I could be partly blocked sometimes. So giving up N might not have been some seriously to regret.)
So I'm airborne in spirit again! What a company! And so good to see Magnicaballi come back to herself, among so many pleasures of the evening: In Chicago, they were on the ground for maybe 48 hours, and she was atypically inexpressive; in the concluding Ricercata of Episodes which I have just come back from, and which is of course Bach arranged by Webern, she was just expressive enough, as each measure of the music tells her to be. She and Matthew Prescott and the superb corps made this the just-right conclusion of the evening -- recollecting the "German school" of composers of which it mostly consists, the hour of Brahms -- but in a modernist crystalline distillation. Farrell does so much right, and laying out a program is not the least of them.
In Ragtime, I realized this evening it's not only my familiarity with the composer's performances that make the music here sound like it lacks a little -- just a little! -- punch, it's also that the dancing, typical of this troupe, has plentyof punch. (No, they don't punch up Liebeslieder, but they do do it large and full.) And I've come to think less of the singers, but just as much of the pianists, Ron Mattson, Farrell's music director and conductor, and Glenn Sales, whose playing with TSFB I have enjoyed before.
I'd be glad to meet some BTer's on Sunday or whenever: I always stretch my legs just inside the ticket-taker's stations, usually not going down the steps into the main foyer. My hair's been white since I was 20 (Irish are like that) and I usually carry a portfolio. I've never worn a carnation in my life!
Posted 09 October 2008 - 08:26 PM
Posted 10 October 2008 - 06:35 AM
I was somewhat disappointed with Liebeslieder, which can be such an exquisite experience if performed in languid style, rather than the choppy pacing delivered here...making the four couples appear to be peasants playing dress-up with their masters' clothing, particularly in the first half. Where are the aristocratic-seeming Kyra Nicholses, Jenifer Ringers and Maria Calegaris when we need them? Last night, the way that one of the ladies sat down on a chair after a dance -- plopping herself down and widening her skirt in a brusque (not soft and discreet) manner ruined the magic for me early-on. Other ladies would mug and over-emote as they sat and watched whoever was dancing at the moment. It's incredible that so much effort went into coaching the steps but not the perfume of the work!
Ragtime (II) is a delightful little bon-bon with charleston-esque hints, toe taps, circular hand movements and even a kissy-kissy moment at the end. I very much enjoyed the on-stage jazz orchestra. Audience seemed to love this ballet the most -- short and sweet....in contrast to not-so-happy rumblings on Liebeslieder. I actually overheard one gal whisper to her neighbor, "At least they danced ballet in the second half."
For me, the evening was all worth it due to an exceptionally beautiful performance of Episodes to four different Anton Webern pieces of music, with the final "Riccercata" section for a full ensemble and leading couple displaying a work that is every bit as masterful as the choreographer's earlier Concerto Barocco. A major reason for Episodes winning the top prize of the night was the participation of the corps de ballet from Ballet Austin in Texas. Kudos to them and to the valiant soloists from the home troupe.
Posted 10 October 2008 - 08:17 AM
Among the things Farrell has done well (besides getting the dancing up this level at least) is to go back to something like the original set for Liebeslieder, as she says in her Notes from the Ballet about this program. For a revival or something, Lincoln Kirstein had a photographically-detailed set built, based on some historically-significant interior, but this ballet is not about that kind of thing. (It's hard to imagine a good one that would be.) I never liked that set. It seemed an upstaging distraction.
Maybe Kirstein was trying to deal with the non-hit-ness of Liebeslieder in New York, which Arlene Croce remarks on, in contrast to Vienna Waltzes, which she says was a hit. Thursday night it was seen here by another crowd that got it, was with it pretty well (although they still had some problems with where to applaud Episodes; still, they wanted to applaud Episodes). Maybe Liebeslieder has found its time and place. It's to Farrell's credit that she mounts a potentially demanding program. I don't know quite how big it is, but she seems to have an audience for it, too. All for the best.
Today's (Friday's) "Washington Post" has a good review by Sarah Kaufman. Usually "a good review" means a positive one, but I mean that it positively, actually helps the reader to comprehend and enjoy what they may see, and Kaufman gives us some of that.
I have more quibbles about the pictures and their captions: The one on the front page of the section turns out to show, not TSFB dancers, but, ironically, Ballet Austin's dancers, of whom there are a dozen in Episodes. And under the second picture it would have been better style to have used the full title of the ballet shown, "Liebeslieder Walzer" instead of just the first word. To identify the eight dancers there might have made the caption too long, or maybe not, because Kaufman speaks of them just below on the newspaper page. Anyway it's more a matter for those with a deeper interest in the subject. People like us? From left to right, they are Ashley Hubbard with Runqiao Du (back of his head to us), Natalia Magnicaballi with Matthew Prescott, Erin Mahoney-Du with Momchil Mladenov, and (mostly hidden) Bonnie Pickard with Michael Cook.
Notice in this picture not only the girls' gowns but their character shoes, and the chairs at the back, details which identify it as of part one, to the Opus 52 music.
Balanchine says, in Balanchine's Complete Stories of the Great Ballets, that he didn't put the words of the love-songs in the program because that "would suggest that the dances were illustrations and I never had that in mind." Instad of the words, I listen to the melodies and watch how these melodies are danced, their emotional tone, their rhythm, their outline, even: If the melody goes higher, chances are one of the women will, too.
But of the last song, Balanchine says, "The words ought to be listened to in silence", and prints them in his book. Because they're not in the program, and the Complete Stories are not widely available, I put them here: Now, Muses, enough! You try in vain to portray how misery and happiness alternate in a loving heart.
("Listened to in silence"? In silence, there's nothing to hear, right? Whether Mr. B, always the teacher, hands us this little paradox as an intentional challenge or whether it's a "slip", something from deeper within him, I think here again there's the idea of "See the music, hear the dance." As the dancers come back on stage, they don't dance. They're "silent".)
Kaufman speaks of Episodes as "a ballet of little sound and few steps. Webern's jagged music is reduced in spots to elemental notes, while the dancing is similarly spare." Leaving aside the filling-in in the very last piece, the Bach orchestration, that's a fair account, although, again, Balanchine's description seems to me more evocative: "Webern's music fills the air like molecules." Molecules. Remember that chemistry course, where molecules were represented as... little spheres... or... clumps of little spheres... with... ... ... in between.
*I thought I was choosing this word as though speaking tongue-in-cheek. I've since gathered that the budget is the same as before; they've just found ways to get more out of it. *sigh*
Edited by Jack Reed, 12 October 2008 - 07:29 PM.
Posted 10 October 2008 - 10:43 AM
Thank you for also identifying the dancers in the photo. Mr. Prescott was easily identified by his glorious curls, but I had a hard time with the others.
Would you be so kind as to describe the costuming detail, and also who gets credit for their construction?
I don't mean to be beging for details, but I do love all the details!
If not too much trouble, were any of the regular corps members there? Reed? Kurt? Ian? etc.?
Thank you soooo much for your incite, opinions and observations...keep them coming!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):