Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

NYCB in London


Recommended Posts

The casting for the London visit is now up on NYCB's website - would anyone like to take a look and point out any particular treats in store for us? (As well as Hubbe's appearance!)

I notice that Tess Reichlen is shown as making her debut in In Vento - who created that role? Kowroski? (who apparently isn't coming to London)

Link to comment

Especially good treats to see:

* Bouder and Ulbricht in Tarantella

* Hubbe in Zakouski

* Taylor in Serenade

* Bouder, Ulbricht in Fall of Four Seasons, and Millepied (if he's in the mood, and the tempi is not too fast...)

>I notice that Tess Reichlen is shown as making her debut in In Vento - who created that role? Kowroski?

Yes, Kowroski was the original lead female. In Vento is also a good treat on my list, but it's not my favorite. I do love the music and Millepied as the male lead. It would be worth seeing. And I'll be curious to hear what sort of style/chemistry the tall, long-limbed, cool, coltish beauty of Reichlen brings to the ballet.

p.s. And don't miss Alastair Macaulay's comments in the NYTimes tomorrow about NYCB. I'm in total agreement. It is a terrible pity that the director, Peter Martins, doesn't have the good judgment to make necessary decisions before such a publicly-shaming article must be written.

Link to comment

Oh, and if you've never seen Symphony in C, it's a fantastic ballet. Casting, overall, hasn't been ideal for awhile, but in London, there will be some gems to see: Peck, Mearns, Scheller, Garcia, Carmena.

Link to comment

Beyond sz's good recommendations, I can't urge you strongly enough to see Ashley Bouder. She is, IMO, The Ballerina of her generation.

Also, I like The Russian Seasons. It was commissioned by NYCB last year and is probably not widely performed -- yet. I think it was Michael who described it perfectly as Les Noces at a Gathering. :lol: Very Russian-folkloric, if you like that kind of thing. Unfortunately, I can't recommend the rest of that program. But it might be worth your while to buy a ticket just for the closing ballet. :angel_not:

Edited by carbro
Link to comment

Following sz's suggestion, I also recommend the Macaulay article in the 3/9 Times -- "Off to London, but not Packing their Best." I can't comment on the suggestion that some of the current NYCB rep is danced in a "virtually anti-Balanchinian" manner, but I have to admit being excited that this is the first NYCB visit in 24 years !!! :angel_not:

ON Wednesday New York City Ballet will open a season in London, its first there in more than 24 years and its first ever at the London Coliseum (a good theater for ballet: its dance history, which includes recent seasons by the Kirov and the Bolshoi, goes back to Diaghilev). The opening piece will be George Balanchine’s “Serenade†(1934).

I hope this the first step of a process that turns the NYCB back into the truly international company it once was.

Link to comment

Jane -- I think your casting is quite good, in most instances better than how the same ballets were cast here this winter. The casting in Western has definitely improved from the State Theater. You've got the Taylor/Bouder/Gilliland cast of Serenade for the most part; I wish we could have seen that here. Mearns in Bizet 2d movement is an absolute must see. Both Fairchild and Sterling Hyltin too in 3d movement. Hyltin for spaciousness, strength, the raw movement quality -- she was not well utilized here this past season; she's really very fine. Ditto Mearns as spring in 4 Seasons (sorry you won't see Rebecca Krohn do summer in that ballet). I'd want to see Megan LeCrone in Agon -- she's got the intense, neo-classical, thing that Macauley thinks is often missing, only she carries it nearly to anti-classicism in a similar way to Whelan and for the same reason -- because the body is a bit anti-classical. LeCrone, if she can stay healthy, is a natural for much of Whelan's repertory. In Vento should look beautiful on Reichlen but it's an ensemble piece and will look good on everyone -- Tiler Peck is beautiful in it, dark, sexy, sunk into her hips, you'll be surprised it's the same girl who danced Carousel.

I envy you the season and generally they are putting their best foot forward.

I do think Martins is making a mistake (and asking for trouble from the critics) by taking Thou Swell there. He seems quite fond of that ballet (they took it to Copenhagen also three years ago) reinforcing my theory that the "inner editor" is what he often lacks.

Link to comment

Megan LeCrone is far more a young Karin von Aroldingen. She has an interesting upper body (wide shoulders and long arms), but her legs, technique and overall style cannot compare whatsoever to the gorgeous, elegant, strong, fierce energy, and bright, angular beauty that Wendy Whelan once brought to NYCB. Wendy now is at the end of her career, and most of her recent performances, for me, are a sad reminder of what once was.

Yes, there's room for another Karin type at NYCB, but I'd love to see LeCrone in Stravinsky Violin Concerto (Karin's old part) instead of Agon. Now that ballet would have been a far better choice to bring to London (among hundreds of others) than Peter's costume parade of Thou Swell.

Link to comment

Well it's certainly a great compliment to LeCrone to be compared to Von Aroldingen. Though I think she's probably purer and and more classical, stronger and better trained as an academic dancer than Von Aroldingen was. (Probably doesn't make chicken soup as well, however). In any case, it will be interesting to see what the London audience thinks.

Link to comment

Might as well add to the cacophony here!

I can't say they're bringing their best to London either in rep or casting. I feel sorry for any Londoner who has never seen Kistler and is getting a first glimpse of her now. You're not going to see what we once saw - at all. They also don't have a great Symphony in C cast at present (I haven't seen Mearns, but I'm not completely sold on her yet; in many ballets she's blank.)

LeCrone in Agon is interesting - I fall somewhere between Michael and sz on this - I don't know that she's a von Aroldingen type, but she's not "classical" - she's unorthodox but fascinating for it and she does the pas de deux quite well.

If Bouder and Ulbricht in Tarantella don't start a five alarm blaze in the theater, demand your money back.

I've hated every Bigonzetti ballet I've seen (I'd sit through three Thou Swells painlessly if I could miss In Vento - but I find Thou Swell harmless) so pick your poison. Russian Seasons is worth seeing.

Now armed with these contradictions, Londoners, venture forth and tell us what you thought!

Link to comment
If Bouder and Ulbricht in Tarantella don't start a five alarm blaze in the theater, demand your money back.

Like minds, Leigh. I was just commenting to someone that their pairing in Tarantella will likely make the house explode from all that energy! I'm very sorry I didn't get to see them perform together here. I had wondered if Bouder kept 'one upping' herself in Four Seasons this last season because she had to contend with Ulbricht in the same section (though, of course, she is always trying new things).

-amanda

Link to comment

I had mixed feelings but agree about Wendy Whelan. The hideous costumes for Symphony in C were a shock and flattered almost no one; this is a ballet that is danced brilliantly by other companies now, particularly the Bolshoi. Liked Gonzalo Garcia though. Serenade was superb and I'd never seen it danced so fast but like most people of my generation I positively loathe all that long hair business.

Link to comment
Serenade was superb and I'd never seen it danced so fast but like most people of my generation I positively loathe all that long hair business.

Fascinating. "Most people of my generation" ?? And this remarkable figure comes from where? Does it include only the UK, or all of Europe, or everyone everywhere? If it's true, one can only wonder at "positively loathing" this particular "business" in such exceptional numbers and for just one generation. Why exactly? Because it's messy? cliched? romantic? anti-feminist? indecorous? low-class? an insult to hair-dressers? what?

Of the fast tempi, I'd suggest that too many companies slow them down for Balanchine ballets and possibly, seeing one danced at the speed Balanchine intended can be something of a shock.

Link to comment

[Moderator Beanie on]

I'm sure we can discuss this without a food fight, folks :). Try and leave room in your reports for differing opinions.

[Moderator Beanie off]

My spies were fond of Mearns in second movement. Other comments? Has Bouder blasted onto stage yet?

Ami, if you don't report further I will not give you my recipe for sambar.

Link to comment

Okay, some more coherent thoughts, as promised to some of you.

Let me preface this by saying this is my first time seeing the entire company - I saw Danses Concertantes at the Wells a few years ago, but previously all of my knowledge of NYCB has been based on old books and videos that I could access in my small-town's public library. I've wanted to see NYCB since I was about 10. Thus last night's all-Balanchine programme was a special treat for me.... I thus put forth my thoughts very timidly, as most of you know the company very well.

It was also my first time seeing Serenade, led by Janie Taylor, Ashley Bouder, Kaitlyn Gilliland, Philip Neal, and Ask le Cour. I knew there was 'long hair coming' - but I must say I am impressed by the ability to make beautiful, big, ballet buns with just a few pins, and remove those pins so quickly! Here, I thought the musicality of the corps in general was fabulous - they were very together. However, as would also be evident in the later ballets, I noticed that some of them looked especially frantic in faster tempos - particularly their arms. Taylor is a wisp of a dancer, in the best possible sense, and the ending tableau emphasised this quality. Bouder was impressive - am pleased to have seen her live - although wish there was more of her dancing last night!

Agon. As I stated above, Wendy Whelan owned the night. What a marvelous technician, brilliant and exacting, accurate in her placement, use of space, and sense of purpose. Yes, you can dance that fast (or that slow) and be just so fabulously ON and perfect - no frantic arms here, but rather a magnificent commanding of the music and of the space. It was a majestic performance... I might get shot for saying this, but I think a great display of the clean, classical training that helps shapes a dancer's ability to move in non-classical ways. Albert Evans was her solid and reliable partner, but perhaps lacking the purpose of movement that Whelan displayed.

I last saw Amar Ramasar in London with Danses Concertantes. He's grown a lot as a performer, and in his flexiblity. At one brief moment at the beginning of Agon, I felt that he was dancing as if he had just rehearsed West Side Story - but thankfully that moment passed!

The first pas de trois was danced by Veyette, Krohn, and Tinsley-Williams. Unfortunately our programmes only had photos of principals, so I'm unsure who was who of the girls. Whomever the blonde was - stage right - was astounding in her command of the music, and again clear and accurate in presentation. Reichlen was equally as watchable in the second pas de trois with Ramasar and T. Angle - overall I feel that last night we really saw the strength of the NYCB women.

The evening ended with Symphony in C. As Mashinka noted - the costumes are not what we're used to seeing here with the Royal and the Russian companies. I was actually shocked by the women's costumes. What is the history of the different productions/what is used where? The S in C costumes were so lacking in grandeur that I felt it actually took away from the dancing to some extent... the first movement was led by the Stafford siblings, the second by Mearns and Askegard. While they were beautifully danced, to me, there was something rather bland about the presentations. The second movement was quicker than the Royal does it for sure, but somehow lacking dynamism of any sort. I do think it ends in a slightly different tableau than the Royal does - can anyone confirm? For me, the ballet really started in the third movement with a suitably perky performance by Megan Fairchild. Unlike Mashinka, I thought Fairchild wiped the floor with him! (ETA: I mean wiped the floor with Garcia!) She is so alive and radiant on stage, and he didn't seem to match her presence by a longshot. Tiler Peck's beginning of the fourth movement was the fastest I've seen - and again brilliantly executed - with no sense of franticness.

Overall, I'm glad I finally have seen NYCB dance live, and especially dancing Balanchine. While I was excited and provoked by some outstanding female dancers, none came close to Whelan - and the men, to me, were far behind most of the ladies. But then, these ballets don't really show off the men as much as the women! I do think there was a great distinction between most of the women who were dancing soloist/principal roles, and the rest of the corps - perhaps a worrying one. This isn't necessarily a clean distiction - I think some dancers who were in the corps last night fabulous, and vice versa... but with the few signs of franticness, and some signs of affected dancing (dancing in what you may think the style is/it should look like as opposed to dancing the style - if that makes sense) may be a bit worrying. But who am I to judge - I'm sure other NYCB watchers/knowers out there have many thoughts on that.... (or may want to take me apart for saying it as well...!)

That said.... I only have tickets for one more programme - the Broadway one (without Bouder in Tarantella, unfortunately). I might try to sneak in another one or two - but they are expensive and I don't live in London... but still... am tempted. Any suggestions if I could only go to one more?

Link to comment

Several people here and over at ballet.co.uk have commented unfavorably on the Symphony in C tutus. I always thought they were quite beautiful and am very fond of that softer Karinska style. But to each his or her own - I'll look again next time with a fresher eye.

Here in NYC, I have not been that impressed with Garcia. Usually he seems sloppy to me but it does take a few years to work into the NYCB style and schedule. So, let's give him time.

Link to comment
The first pas de trois was danced by Veyette, Krohn, and Tinsley-Williams. Unfortunately our programmes only had photos of principals, so I'm unsure who was who of the girls. Whomever the blonde was - stage right - was astounding in her command of the music, and again clear and accurate in presentation.
Blonde would be Tinsley-Williams. Glad to hear she did so well, as she's recently returned to the stage after an extended absence. I noticed a new authority and joy in her dancing this past season.

If you need to identify any more sub-principals, you can find (sometimes misleading) headshots -->here. But you have to search by name, so identifying an eye-catching corps dancer just might take a little time. :)

I wish I could recommend another date for you. If I did, it would be March 19, to see Bouder in a role that is truly her element, but I don't know if you'd think the program as a whole, especially at high prices, would be worth it.

Thanks so much for your review, ami, and I'm sure Leigh will keep his word on the recipe. :)

Link to comment
That said.... I only have tickets for one more programme - the Broadway one (without Bouder in Tarantella, unfortunately). I might try to sneak in another one or two - but they are expensive and I don't live in London... but still... am tempted. Any suggestions if I could only go to one more?

I would prefer for you to see Bouder/Ulbricht in Tarantella over Hyltin/Garcia if you can manage it. I'd say any chance to see, in addition to those two firecrackers, dancers like Woetzel, Taylor, Whelan, Reichlin, and Hubbe is worth taking. I would have added Kowroski, but I don't see her name announced anywhere.

Like several others here, I'm somewhat disappointed in the choice of repertoire you've been given. Of all the great things we could have sent you - Prodigal Son, Fancy Free, Four Temperaments, Firebird, any or all of Jewels - you're getting some less than stellar ballets. But it's great that you're getting Agon, Serenade, Bizet Symphony - some of my favorite ballets of all time.

Link to comment

Thanks carbro and klavier, for your suggestions. I am going to London on the 19th, but to see the Royal! I might see if I can convince my friend to switch times for the 22nd (we have matinee tickets, I wonder if we could now get evening ones?). It might be tough (she has a sweet little baby at home, so matinees are best....). I might even stay in the evening just through Tarantella if I can find a ticket.... A shame, as the evening casting is the same except for Tarantella. Overall I do think I prefer the casting of the 19th... I would try to run between the Coliseum and ROH, but I don't think it woudl work!

I am very glad about the programming for the first bill - Serenade, Agon, S. in C. - I heard some moans about it, as these are not new ballets to the London audience, but I think it was fabulous to be able to compare and contrast. RB is doing Serenade next month, and having done Jewels last year, I would love to see NYCB in Jewels... Considering NYCB's over-all quickness, I also wouldn't mind seeing Theme and Variations, or Ballo.... along with the other recommendations above! I guess I should move to NYC for a while!

Link to comment
Fascinating. "Most people of my generation" ?? And this remarkable figure comes from where? Does it include only the UK, or all of Europe, or everyone everywhere? If it's true, one can only wonder at "positively loathing" this particular "business" in such exceptional numbers and for just one generation. Why exactly? Because it's messy? cliched? romantic? anti-feminist? indecorous? low-class? an insult to hair-dressers? what?

To answer your question I'd like to say that I first saw Serenade either in 1964 or 65, roughly 45 years ago and hair was always pinned up as a matter of course back then, in fact the only dancer with loose hair was Giselle when mad. Modern dance of course was another matter. As Serenade was created back in the 1930's and is in the repertoire of most of the major companies I'm inclined to regard it as a classic and it is therefore the only ballet of its kind that makes a feature of hair hanging loose. Of those that remember Serenade without hair whipping around, sweeping the floor and so on, I've not yet spoken to anyone that likes it. Most share my view that it is seriously distracting.

Of the fast tempi, I'd suggest that too many companies slow them down for Balanchine ballets and possibly, seeing one danced at the speed Balanchine intended can be something of a shock.

Not a shock, but a delightful surprise. Balanchine has always been the choreographer most faithful to a composer's intentions and as Serenade can sound incredibly dreary when slowed down, Wednesday's performance was a real listening pleasure.

Link to comment
Of the fast tempi, I'd suggest that too many companies slow them down for Balanchine ballets and possibly, seeing one danced at the speed Balanchine intended can be something of a shock.

Not a shock, but a delightful surprise. Balanchine has always been the choreographer most faithful to a composer's intentions and as Serenade can sound incredibly dreary when slowed down, Wednesday's performance was a real listening pleasure.

Not to argue with you, Mashinka, and this may actually be a big enough topic for its own thread, but I think B was faithful to a "composer's intentions" as they were imagined at the time he choreographed. In other words, he was well-versed in the performance practices of his day, which had its own take on how music should be played. Today, much of that tradition has been questioned, especially on the earlier music side. Balanchine's Bach, for instance, is not the Bach most musicians would play today; same with Mozart. His listening tradition emerged from the era of the great post-Romantic players and conductors, and their protoges. (I think this is a fascinatingly under-studied area of Balanchine's practice.)

Also, I think sometimes tempos are slowed down because dancers today dance bigger, sacrificing speed. Probably something they need to examine!

Link to comment
Also, I think sometimes tempos are slowed down because dancers today dance bigger, sacrificing speed. Probably something they need to examine!

Agreed - to an extent. I think the best of what I saw on Weds were those dancers who danced big and accurate - Whelan especially. And although it's all from video, I never thought of the 'original' NYCB ballerinas as *not* dancing big - in fact what was so fabulous about them was their use of space regardless of tempo. To some extent, what I've liked about some Balanchine ballets (or shall I say, casting for Balanchine ballets), is a bit of the challenge to usual senses of dancer 'types' - here we see some tall, leggy dancers whipping through quick allegro. When done right, it can be absolutely brilliant.

But again, I don't know enough about NYCB or Balanchine performances writ-large!

Your comments on music, Ray, are fascinating! Thanks.

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...