How important is it to be tall for a male dancer?
#1
Posted 22 February 2008 - 01:06 PM
I know Bolle is 1,87....I wonder if Malakhov or Corella are as tall or less.Please understand the paranoia of a young(mmmm....getting old;-)) dancer:D.
#2
Posted 22 February 2008 - 01:31 PM
That's "medium" in my book rather than short. (I'm about your height).
NYCB and ABT have both trended shorter rather than taller for a bit because of dancers like Baryshnikov and Corella. In some ways it's a little harder, because you're neither-nor (not a tall porteur nor a short pyrotechnician) but you're taller than Peter Boal, for instance - he seemed taller because of his proportions.
I don't think your height will keep you out of a company, though it might limit the size of women you can partner slightly.
#3
Posted 22 February 2008 - 02:11 PM
Leigh Witchel, on Feb 22 2008, 10:31 PM, said:
Sorry for not converting myself the measurements but I actually don't know them so well....I hope it will not be a problem.Here in Europe it seems as if they're requiring and taking only tall male dancers...in this moment I have some galas to dance in,but was wondering about the moment in which I'll have to audition for a company...Thanks again.
#4
Posted 06 March 2008 - 05:34 PM
#5
Posted 06 March 2008 - 06:48 PM
Are you past your growth stage? You may want to speak with a nutritionist to ensure you are eating a proper diet.
Let us know where you go!
#6
Posted 06 March 2008 - 10:10 PM
#7
Posted 07 March 2008 - 11:12 AM
Quote
Yes, I’d have thought Baryshnikov was about an inch shorter.
Quote
I don't think someone who is 5'9" has to worry about an improper diet.
Five-nine doesn't seem short to me, either, but we are living in an era of height inflation – people on average are taller.
#8
Posted 31 March 2008 - 09:10 AM
Quote
It wasn’t too long ago that a woman anywhere would have been considered fairly tall at 5’7”; these days it seems to have been downgraded to medium height. There was an article in Vogue awhile back about the actor Jennifer Connelly, who is also five-seven, and there was the same implication that she’s on the short side. It is short by model standards, but not by too many others, I should think.
#9
Posted 31 March 2008 - 09:28 AM
dirac, on Mar 31 2008, 01:10 PM, said:
Unless you have a mother who is 6'--then you get referred to as "the shrimp." Thanks mom!
Aurora (not bitter!)
#11
Posted 31 March 2008 - 09:40 AM
THough little bitty dancers like Plisetskaya and Makarova were VERY easy to see.
#12
Posted 12 May 2008 - 10:52 PM
Anthony_NYC, on Mar 7 2008, 01:10 AM, said:
Reply from Genedancer May 12th 2008 11:48pm
I'm 5'8" - standing next to Michael Somes, Anton Dolin or Robert Joffrey made me feel like I was 6"plus. They were all so tiny. Fantastic dancers, but tiny. On the other hand Reg Park was almost twice the size of Dolin, yet he danced a quartet with Dolin and two female dancers at Ravinia outside Chicago and the performance went fine.
#13
Posted 13 May 2008 - 02:49 AM
Proportion is key and the human form does not scale up and down with all parts of the body remaining in the same size relationship. And of course what is the most ideal shape/proportion is also a variable depending on individual taste. And of course since ballet is an ensemble experience, all the dancers need to appear harmonious to the others. This is taken to the extreme in the corps where we often see dancers which appear to be stamped out of a mold.
I don't especially find tall and lean more attractive in a dancer male, or female.
#14
Posted 13 May 2008 - 08:07 AM
#15
Posted 13 May 2008 - 08:30 AM
dancerboy87, on Feb 22 2008, 11:06 PM, said:
I know Bolle is 1,87....I wonder if Malakhov or Corella are as tall or less.Please understand the paranoia of a young(mmmm....getting old;-)) dancer:D.
I'm 1,78 m right now....I've grown a bit!I'd be happy if I got to 1,80 :-).
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



