on pointe in Sonnambula?Misremembering or not at NCYB?
#1
Posted 18 May 2007 - 06:28 AM
#2
Posted 18 May 2007 - 10:13 AM
ajsnyc, on May 18 2007, 02:28 PM, said:
#3
Posted 18 May 2007 - 11:23 AM
while there have been lengthier and less lengthy a spaces covered by the various ballerinas over the years who danced the sleepwalker, some traveling a few paces some a few more backward into the tower's doorway, i cannot imagine any of them pacing backward on any position other than flat footed, even demi-pointe would seem impossible.
i'm attaching a BALLET RUSSE DE MONTE CARLO publicity photo of A.Danilova's sleepwalker and F. Franklin's poet - sometime after the premiere of this ballet, b/c it's not Magallanes, but while it was still called NIGHT SHADOW.
Attached Files
#4
Posted 18 May 2007 - 08:28 PM
Farrell Fan, on May 18 2007, 02:13 PM, said:
ajsnyc, on May 18 2007, 02:28 PM, said:
And the answer was "No." She also said that many people THINK that that is what they see, but it has never been the case.
#5
Posted 19 May 2007 - 04:07 AM
#6
Posted 19 May 2007 - 04:48 AM
This is in the same category as Fonteyn's first SB in NYC...some claim (among them Robert Helpmann!) that during the Rose Adagio she never took the hand of the fourth prince...I did not see this---and the group of ballet Standees I was with would never have missed it......
#7
Posted 19 May 2007 - 05:28 AM
rg, on May 19 2007, 08:07 AM, said:
#8
Posted 19 May 2007 - 05:30 AM
atm711, on May 19 2007, 12:48 PM, said:
This is in the same category as Fonteyn's first SB in NYC...some claim (among them Robert Helpmann!) that during the Rose Adagio she never took the hand of the fourth prince...I did not see this---and the group of ballet Standees I was with would never have missed it......
#9
Posted 19 May 2007 - 06:25 AM
I do have friends who claim they saw Danilova continue to carry the Poet across the bridge -- but they always say it with a smile.
#10
Posted 19 May 2007 - 07:14 AM
indeed w/the esteban francés decor - i never saw the tanning - the light into the sky was clearly important - i recall arlene croce's dismay (to put it mildly) that when the vaes set came to nycb in the post-balanchine era, not only was there no light in the sky but before it was re-done the set showed no sky above the architecture. (the re-do shows the starlit sky above the clearstory, but still the light fails to leave the building and ascend to the sky, which it would seem it SHOULD do.)
in any case i was no great fan of the francés's setting but it did allow easily for the candle light to float into eternity.
the effect is still possible w/ the new nycb set all that has to be done is to arranage and direct the light from the 'bridge' to the sky.
when this same vaes prod. was first given another crucial detail was missing, that is, to have the entertainers return for the ending in a state of semi-undress - i.e. the women w/ their hair down and the men w/ out masks or full make-up, etc. - but that did get restored sooner than later - prob only b/c someone like croce pointed out the lapse.
#11
Posted 19 May 2007 - 05:25 PM
Thank you all for your interesting replies. I am new here.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



