Posted 22 January 2002 - 05:35 PM
Posted 22 January 2002 - 05:55 PM
Posted 22 January 2002 - 07:35 PM
Then again, I remember when Miranda Weese got promoted ahead of Jeny Ringer. I threatened then too!
I can't imagine what is holding Rutherford's promotion back.
Posted 22 January 2002 - 09:49 PM
[ January 22, 2002: Message edited by: britomart ]
Posted 22 January 2002 - 10:46 PM
I'm glad you delurked and joined in the discussion. Please continue to do so!
My years as a dancer color my opinion of Stafford, and in Theme and Variations especially. It's so viciously difficult, I'm genuinely impressed by someone who can do it with that pure a technique. I don't know what the future holds for her, but I'm interested to find out and wish her well.
I also don't think that Stafford getting a promotion necessarily means that Rutherford won't. This is a special event, probably precipitated by Stafford's debut in Theme and not that related what will happen to Rutherford. It was bound to happen, but my guess is we may see other promotions this season still. My money is actually on Ansanelli to be promoted to principal by season's end.
Posted 22 January 2002 - 11:00 PM
I certainly didn't mean to imply that Stafford's promotion was undeserved. I have no doubts she has the potential to become a workhorse of the repertory, but whether she'll be a Melissa Hayden or an Eleanor d'Antuono remains to be seen.
Regarding Rutherford, well, she's been cast as a soloist for years (except she still does the third swan from the left). I can't imagine what kind of message this is sending (well, I can, but I'd rather not). I can't help but think if Peter really wanted her to be a soloist, she'd have been one long since.
The way Ansanelli's dancing, I wouldn't be surprised to see her promoted. I'd love to see Van Kipnis promoted, too, but I don't see it happening until she gets more principal roles.
[ January 22, 2002: Message edited by: Manhattnik ]
Posted 22 January 2002 - 11:09 PM
On soloists not dancing, it was this way in the Good Old Days too. When I started watching City Ballet there were some soloists who danced a lot -- like Colleen Neary -- and others whom I barely saw (like Susie Hendl and Suzanne Pilarre). Some people were promoted never to be seen again (or seen only in Serenade, a ballet that was not very well cared for in the late 1970s).
I think "Soloist" is an awkward category for companies that don't have predominantly hierarchical repertories. You're really either a star or you're not -- unless a company needs to flesh out those big Petipa ballets.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):