Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

"Jewels" DVD and PBS Great Performances broadcast


  • Please log in to reply
167 replies to this topic

#31 Dale

Dale

    Emeralds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,056 posts

Posted 17 June 2006 - 06:40 PM

For those waiting for the U.S. broadcast (how can you wait?!), PBS lists it as August 28.

#32 richard53dog

richard53dog

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,401 posts

Posted 18 June 2006 - 10:13 AM

For those waiting for the U.S. broadcast (how can you wait?!), PBS lists it as August 28.



Dale,

Thanks, I CAN wait! I'd like to see this before deciding to buy the DVD.

For my own taste I'm thinking that it's too bad the PNB production didn't get taped.


Richard

#33 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,661 posts

Posted 18 June 2006 - 02:38 PM


For those waiting for the U.S. broadcast (how can you wait?!), PBS lists it as August 28.



Dale,

Thanks, I CAN wait! I'd like to see this before deciding to buy the DVD.

For my own taste I'm thinking that it's too bad the PNB production didn't get taped.


Richard


In the best of all possible worlds, they would both be available, so we could compare and contrast.

signed, a very greedy girl

#34 Jack Reed

Jack Reed

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,533 posts

Posted 24 June 2006 - 07:06 PM

I've only lately found time to watch the whole video, so I'm adding my two cents worth late, but I would first like to thank the other posters here not merely for making me aware of it but aware that I could get a version playable on my equipment, intended for the North American market, in contrast to the "PAL" designation on the Amazon UK site. (This reminds me again of how sketchy Amazon's product descriptions are. I don't understand this. If Amazon were to post accurate and complete information for its products, no telling how large they might become! On second thought, as the sales rankings they do post imply, they flourish selling well-known merchandise, not what we buy.)

Overall, I have mixed feelings about the value of this presentation of Jewels. It's certainly a fair introduction to the whole suite, I'd say, for those who don't know it, being the only video of all of it, as far as I know, but anyone interested in it really should also see the excerpts on Nonesuch 79838-2 in the "Choreography by Balanchine" series. There, the dancing, under the choreographer's direction in 1977, is radically different - they "just dance," the Paris dancers perform - but so is the televison direction (by Merrill Brockway): The dancing is clearly visible nearly the whole time, using cameras in deceptively simple ways, basically showing space and letting the dancers dance in it, rather than the overcomplicated, busy, and more interfering technique here. (Shameless plug: Just enter "Choreography by Balanchine" in the box at the top of the page and click "Go.") This new one has in its favor the 16:9 wide-screen format I find more agreeable than the standard 4:3 aspect ratio; which ratio the PBS broadacast uses remains to be seen.

I have no use at all for partial views of a dancer's body. "Partials" were inflicted most liberally on the principals, which is partly why I too found the corps' dancing so enjoyable. Indeed, the Paris dancers offer virtues of their own which, while not exactly authentic or maybe even appropriate, nevertheless deserve to be seen more continuously. And the music on the old video is more enlivened by the conductor (Robert Irving), too, if not as beautiful-sounding as on this new one. All in all, the higher energy level the choreographer preferred, and many of those who grew to love his art did too (and still do), was conspicuous by its absence in this new video.

I haven't seen POB ever before, as far as I can remember, so there was that value for me too.

And with so much bad lighting in ballet today - did anybody here see the Divertimento No. 15 excerpt on the Kennedy Center Honors television program last December? - I was pleasantly surprised to see the stage clearly and simply lit and to see Jennifer Tipton credited.

I'd like to see PNB's Jewels, too, on stage or on video, especially if the first thought in making their video is to get out of the way and let us see the dancing. But the company whose Jewels most deserves wide distribution today in my experience is Miami City Ballet's. In a time when there are many Giselles, Sleeping Beauties, and so on, on video, I'd really like for us to be able, someday, to look back at this effort as the first Jewels on video, not least because I recall Balanchine's ambivalence about televising a ballet, because then people will think that's the only way it should be danced; if there were several videos available, people could compare, discuss, become discriminate, and savor, instead, as sandik suggests.

Oh, and then there's the documentary, which really is better than we'd expect from its title. (I'd say it even contradicts its title a bit.) It suggested the source of one of the problems I have with the performances: How these dancers, especially the ones in Emeralds, look for the story, the character, the mood, how they analyze! I wanted to say, as Balanchine was supposed to have said sometimes, Don't think dear, just do!

But some of the intellectualizing resonated. Some of the best of that came from the director, Pierre Cavassilas: "We find ourselves today watching a ballet which completely transcended its own time... Through these ballets we will find a part of the emotions which were [Balanchine's] during his life and artistic encounters." (I am depending on the English subtitles, which, by the way, didn't always play in my Pioneer equipment, although on the other hand I hadn't any blurry-motion problems.)

Even though he too struggles here with the necessity of characters (it's in chapter 9 at about 43 minutes and 5 seconds into the documentary), I found this like a fresh breeze, having been depressedly aware for so many years recently here in America, at least, of the perverse (because distracting) nonsense that to enter into an artist's intimate life you must study his biography and the history of his place; M. Cavassilas has the connection the right way round: If you want intimate experience of an artist, enter into his work, absorb it, become him; and "transcending its own time" is my working definition of greatness. (This man's a better philosopher than director! Vive la France!)

So there's a lot to like here. Two cheers! But only two, because the two essentials, IMO - authentic dancing and unobtrusive televising - are compromised. [This last sentence added 7th September 2006]

Edited by Jack Reed, 08 May 2009 - 11:56 AM.


#35 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 25 June 2006 - 01:30 PM

Thanks, Jack. You've convinced me. I'm just about to cllick the Amazon box above and move the POB Jewels from my Shopping Cart tot he check-out line. (Extra money for Ballet Talk, too.)

P.S.: I like the lighting on all the recent POB videos I've seen. Am I right in thinking that lighting for televised dance has become infiinitely more viewer-friendly in the past few years?

#36 Estelle

Estelle

    Platinum Circle

  • Foreign Correspondent
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,706 posts

Posted 25 June 2006 - 03:10 PM

I haven't seen that video, but have seen "Jewels" performed by the POB a few times, and I regret that it wasn't filmed earlier with one of the first POB casts... I'd have loved to see a video of it with dancers like Guérin, Gaïda or Maurin in "Emeralds", for example. Also I wonder if Carbone was the planned cast for "Rubies": Manuel Legris danced it many times (and I really found him great in it- but well, I've only seen the POB in that ballet) and usually he connects well with Dupont, but there were moments when he was injured... And sometimes Dupont tends to be a bit "cold" on stage (well, I guess that her numerous fans at the POB might disagree with me about that...), but for example I really loved Osta in that role.

Well, sometimes the POB castings are a bit puzzling, especially as in recent seasons there often were something like 17 different casts in the same program and it was sometimes hard to find a logic in it...

Was it Bart dancing with Letestu in "Diamonds" ? They tend to be often paired together, especially as Martinez and Letestu dance less often together and there are not many male dancers tall enough for Letestu, but I often was somewhat disappointing by such a pairing, as I find them a bit too icy together, with very little chemistry...

#37 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,349 posts

Posted 25 June 2006 - 04:32 PM

Was it Bart dancing with Letestu in "Diamonds" ?

Yes.

#38 Azulynn

Azulynn

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 153 posts

Posted 25 June 2006 - 10:25 PM

Estelle, it should have been Benjamin Pech dancing the lead in Rubies, but he got injured. Unfortunately, Manuel Legris does not dance the part anymore...
I agree with you, Osta was quite outstanding in Rubies, too bad they did not film her. I guess she was needed in Emeralds because Dupont does not do it ; besides, she is probably far too small to be paired with Marie-Agnès Gillot as the tall girl !

#39 Jack Reed

Jack Reed

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,533 posts

Posted 26 June 2006 - 08:05 PM

bart, I've seen so few recently-produced dance videos - the only other one I can think of offhand is the RDB Sylphide - I can't really say. (The Sylphide one was fine in that regard, IIRC.) But the Honors TV program, which wasn't a dance show, of course, had good lighting only for the half-second after the end of the dancing! They could have done that right through, and we could have seen Farrell's dancers to better advantage. An opportunity not firmly grasped, although at least there were no partials.

#40 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 26 June 2006 - 08:52 PM

The RDB Syphide with Jeppesen and Hubbe? Recorded in 1988. Not recent. :thumbsup:

#41 Jack Reed

Jack Reed

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,533 posts

Posted 27 June 2006 - 11:53 AM

Egad, folks! She's right, of course! Tending to prove that better and worse televising (or filming) of dance comes and goes without regard for the epoch when it takes place.

#42 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,902 posts

Posted 30 June 2006 - 08:53 PM

After having viewed this video, I really wish Osta and Dupont had switched roles. Dupont is really miscast in Rubies -- she has the steps, but none of the attitude. Her pirouettes are truly a wonder. But there's no sass, no flirtation, no fun. Osta is absolutely beautiful in Emeralds, but her role was rather small, and somehow I just think she would have been better than Dupont in Rubies.

#43 Brioche

Brioche

    Inactive Member

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 176 posts

Posted 06 July 2006 - 09:37 AM

I just received this DVD yesterday I have a lot to say about it, but won't for fear of boring you all to tears.

In short though, I will say I feel very, very lucky to have this companys performance(s) of Jewels on DVD.

I've seen Jewels a number of times at San Francisco Ballet and enjoyed it. This companys take on Jewels is a revelation in terms of what I saw at SFB. No offense to the wonderful company in SF.

The documentary on the DVD is worth the price of owning it, IMHO.

Enjoy!
D

#44 Andre Yew

Andre Yew

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 224 posts

Posted 09 July 2006 - 08:44 PM

What's more worrying however is the definition quality of the image, blurry in movements (it seems it was produced for TV?)


I see this problem too. I'm curious if you use a progressive scan TV (eg. LCD, plasma, or something that upconverts to 480p). Other Opus Arte DVDs I have don't have this problem.

I haven't watched all of it yet, but I thought Emeralds was superb: it has a solidity that I haven't seen elsewhere, where its ephemeral perfume qualities seem to be more emphasized. I loved the ring solo, where she starts turning her hand over as if she were examining a ring.

--Andre

#45 kfw

kfw

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,320 posts

Posted 10 July 2006 - 01:18 PM

For the most part I like Lacroix's costumes and sets in this production, but the ruffle at the top of the skirts Dupont and Gillot wear in Rubies seems inappropriately fussy for that ballet, and doesn't flatter their midriffs.

Rubies has been in the POB rep since the 1974. Perhaps it was originally done with more abandon. In the documentary I like hearing the dancers muse in typically French fashion. How well spoken they are, and how beautiful, to this English speaker, the spoken French! Another bonus is the photo of Balanchine and Farrell at van Cleef and Arpels, both of them radiant as he puts a necklace on her.

What's strange about this DVD is the way Diamonds is credited in the booklet, with a 31 second "opening" followed by two pas de deux (the second by Ciaravola and Cozette) and then two ensembles.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):