Balanchine Style Question
Posted 19 April 2006 - 01:13 PM
I was wondering if someone with a greater knowledge of Balanchine style and history than I, could possibly answer my question about a hallmark of Balanchine style.
I'm talking about the broken limpid wrist of the Balanchine ballerina in her port de bras. Choreographically, stylistcally, historically etc
Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Posted 19 April 2006 - 06:30 PM
Posted 19 April 2006 - 06:48 PM
Also, i talked with one of my teachers once on how he came up with alot of his style, and he got much of his inspiration from the american jazz of that era. So thats why much of his choreography has a very jazz look to it if you look closely at it. Similar to the Luigi style of jazz that is still taught today ("classical" jazz as it is referred to now). For example, the extreme arabesque arms came from the classical jazz. If you've ever taken a luigi style jazz class, you'd be surprised of the similarities. We train in luigi, so i've become quite familiar with the influence it had on Balanchine.
As for the energetic hands, he may have just liked it better... and it could have evolved over time becoming more and more extreme.
Posted 19 April 2006 - 07:09 PM
Posted 19 April 2006 - 10:02 PM
I don't know about ease of execution, but aesthetically, it is much more pleasing. A lunge is an attractive position. Demi plie in fourth position is very ungainly.
For example, doing a pirouette from a lunge was said to be easier for taller dancers.
Posted 20 April 2006 - 02:57 AM
I don't know much about the origins of his style, but i do know that he directed his technique (now more of a style) towards taller dancers.
Balanchine's active period as a choreographer spand a 60 year period. His choreography was for dancers of all heights. Particularly in the first 40 years of his work most dancers were not particularly tall. They may have looked tall from the stage but they were not particularly tall. Long legged for the most part, but tall, not really, at least by comparison for the taller dancers of the 21st century.
The comparison to and influence of Luigi is indeed an interesting one. Luigi's teachers (according to Koegler) were Bolm, Nijinska, Canton, Loring and Panaieff. Luigi being younger than Balanchine by 21 years may have crossed paths with Balanchine at some point, however Balanchine was creating ballets in the US in 1933 when Luigi was still a youngster. The lunge as the preparation for pirouette is a direct decent from the preparation for pirouette in Petrograd schooling. Since Mr. Balanchine began his training in St. Petersburg, (pre-Vaganova), it is more likely that his usage of this preparation was influenced more by his training in Russia.
The subject of Balanchine and his style is still evolving. It is commonly believed that Balanchine studied the Vaganova program, which he did not. Vaganova entered Petrograd School, as a teacher, the year of his graduation. She did not become a director until 1934, when Balanchine was already working in the US. His style was definitely influenced by his Russian roots however what he learned in the US did influence his ballets.
Running a Search on Balanchine my bring up some interesting ideas that have previously been discussed at Ballet Talk. Also visit the sister website, Ballet Talk for Dancers for similar discussions regarding the technical aspects of the Balanchine style of training and performing.
Posted 20 April 2006 - 09:35 AM
Posted 20 April 2006 - 09:51 AM
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:00 PM
Through the years I've heard people with all kinds of responses to Balanchine's port de bras: "I don't like the broken wrist" to "He lets the dancers do what they please." At various talks, I've heard how in class he emphasized holding your had as if you were holding a small, fragile ball, or how in the waltz that the men would just hold the women by three fingers, very delicately. Dancers nearly always show a hand with a graceful curve, the index finger higher than the others, and the others arranged something like a fan, the thumb nearly touching the other fingers.
So I just flipped through a few of the 100th Anniversary books and some other books of photos, and you can see a wide range of port de bras: angular in the black & White leotard ballets, soft in the more romantic ballets.
Take a look, you'll see that most of the time the style of port de bras matches the style of the ballet.
VRS, I was fascinated to learn about Luigi's teachers. I watched a few of his classes back in the 70's when a close friend was studying with him -- wonderful and dynamic. I didn't have the vision to see the basis in ballet. Thanks[/font][/size]
Posted 20 April 2006 - 07:47 PM
Posted 20 April 2006 - 09:14 PM
Posted 20 April 2006 - 10:53 PM
Is there anyone who has and can tell us if Suki Shorer discusses the hands and wrists in port de bras?
Sadly, it's not available on amazon.com, nor on the Barnes and Noble or NYCB sites, which are the three references given on The Balanchine Foundation site.
Posted 21 April 2006 - 03:47 AM
The placement of the arm in 2nd position is actually from the Russian classical school (not the way the arm actually moves, just the placement). For the most part the finger grouping, level of arms and manner of moving is Russian character dance. Having heard many noted Russians as they viewed Balanchine for the first time exclaim, "...interesting, but the arms are character arms..." I began to try to see what they were saying. The closest comparison I am able to think of at this time is Scherazade. While the arm movements in Scherazade are lovely when performed slowly, think what a disaster a classical work might be if that was the only way to move the arms. Drama and schmulze over done becomes a displeasure when done repeatedly with the incorrect emotional balance, music and movement. The arms in Scherazade (when done correctly) are emotionally pleasing in part because of the music and the drama of the ballet. The arms in Scherazade are character arms and they work in that ballet, but they would not work in Swan Lake, Sleeping Beauty or any of the ballets in the Romantic or Classical periods. Whether or not Balanchine arms work in various 20th century ballets is a discussion that will develop over time.
Just as we know in the 21st century that we have no clue as to how the classics really looked or were meant to look or if the 21st century teaching "improvements" would be improvements to the choreographers of the 19th century, the jury is out on the Balanchine legacy. It is still too soon to tell. With the marketing abilities of big business, for now it is difficult to step back and see inside the bowl.
An interesting discussion however!
FYI: Having been to various lectures on Balanchine and have seen various videos on the Balanchine teaching legacy, finding an actual methodology as I know in Vaganova schooling has not exactly jumped out at me. However the stories are lovely, the history becomes clearer the more the history is spoken or written and the aura begins to erode.
Posted 21 April 2006 - 10:40 AM
I also agree with vrs about the "character" arms. In character class at UBA when we would do a Spanish dance, imagine my surprise at seeing my former-Bolshoi teacher demonstrate "Balanchine hands and arms!" He even singled me out as doing it more easily than the rest of the class.
Of course, when it came to doing the elegant Vaganova port de bras, well, that was a different story--after I had been at SAB for a while, Sir Pyotr Pestov told me my hands looked like forks, so the whole silverware analogy is a double-edged sword.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users