POB Competition 2005Does somebody know anything?
Posted 22 December 2005 - 04:39 AM
Does anybody know anything about the annual competition taking place in Paris? When does it take place? Any other information?
Posted 22 December 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posted 22 December 2005 - 05:58 AM
Positions available for them :
2 "Première danseuse"
Posted 26 December 2005 - 06:00 AM
It also lists the promoted male dancers, most notably Stéphane Phavorin as premier danseur. I'm happy for Phavorin, even if a bit surprised as he has been a sujet for more than 10 years and so was not very expected to be promoted (but his career was slowed by several problems of injuries).
Congratulations to all the newly promoted dancers ! I'm a bit sorry for Fanny Fiat, a talented sujet who also deserved to be promoted, but Myriam Ould-Braham and Dorothée Gilbert both are young gifted dancers who already performed quite a lot of important roles and their promotions were somewhat expected. And also I'm looking forward to seeing Laura Hecquet in bigger roles; she had impressed me a lot in Jean-Guillaume Bart's pas de deux "Javotte" a few years ago in a "Young dancers" program.
I haven't seen yet if there is a page about the competition's results on the official POB site (I haven't found it yet, but now I'm on vacation and only have a slow connection so finding things on the POB site isn't very easy).
It was a relatively good year for the POB dancers in terms of positions. (Actually, I feel a bit sorry for some dancers of a previous generation like Nathalie Aubin, Laure Muret, Miteki Kudo or Delphine Baey, who happened to be sujets in a period with very few available positions of premiere danseuse, as I feel they could have been promoted if only they were born a bit earlier or later...)
Posted 26 December 2005 - 07:18 AM
Posted 26 December 2005 - 08:20 AM
Posted 26 December 2005 - 10:57 AM
The dancers are competing for some better positions in the POB's hierarchy and the winners are promoted to the next level. The number of slots available for each level varies from year to year and from level to level.
Posted 27 December 2005 - 11:16 AM
Posted 27 December 2005 - 11:27 AM
Stéphane Phavorin: promoted to Premier Danseur
Yong-Geol Kim: promoted to Sujet
Adrien Bodet, Audric Bezard, Mathias Heymann: promoted to Coryphée
Posted 27 December 2005 - 11:45 AM
Thanks in advance.
Posted 27 December 2005 - 02:53 PM
Female variation: Kitri's vision in "Don Quixote" Act II (chor. Nureyev)
Male Variation: Basilio variation in "Don Quixote" Act III (chor. Nureyev)
Female variation: "Raymonda", Pizzicatti variation (chor. Nureyev)
Male Variation: "Suite en blanc", Mazurka (chor. Lifar)
Female variation: "Romeo and Juliet", Juliet 1st variation (chor. Nureyev)
Male variation: "Manon", Des Grieux variation (chor. MacMillan)
And second, they dance a free variation taken from the Paris Opera Ballet repertoire. So it can be classical, neo-classical or contemporary. Robbins ("Other dances", "Four Seasons"), Roland Petit for instance are often chosen by the candidates.
They are judged by a jury composed of the Director of the Opera (Mr Gérard Mortier), the Director of the Ballet (Mrs Brigitte Lefèvre), the ballet master (Mr Patrice Bart), two other personalities (one comes from another company) and five dancers from the company elected (it changes each year).
Posted 27 December 2005 - 03:27 PM
I wonder whether any other companies base promotions on a similar organized and highly rational (and, it seems, highly "French") manner.
And I wonder what other BT'ers think about this system as compared to the way dancers in companies are promoted (or not).
Posted 28 December 2005 - 01:25 AM
Moreover, I also think that this system is very "french": you have, just like at the time of Louis XIV, -the King who created the Royal Academy of Music, the ancestor of our ballet-, to "please the Prince". Why not, but ideally, has it anything to do with dancing?
Dancers should be judged on performances the whole year long, and then be promoted.
Anyway, this is our system, our tradition, and I respect it despite these critics. Nureyev, when he was the Director of the Ballet, wanted to delete the "concours", but the dancers went on strike to preserve it!!!!
Posted 28 December 2005 - 12:35 PM
It always is a somewhat heated topic...
sophia, I this that this system is very "French" also because a lot of things depend on competitions in the French society (e.g. to have a civil servant job, to get into the most prestigious schools, etc.) Except that of course it is a very special kind of competition, as it is not anonymous and the judging is more subjective than for, say, a competition to get a teaching job.
In my opinion, the negative sides of the competition are:
- it often isn't objective, as the company's direction has a very heavy weight in the ranking, and there often has been questionable decisions (e.g. some years two positions of premiere danseuse were open and only one was filled, which seemed to mean than nobody was good enough, but some of the dancers who competed then were promoted on the following years...) But I guess it's a problem with every mode of promotion, anyway.
- being injured on the day of the competition means no promotion for one year, so it can slower the career of a good dancer who has the bad luck to be injured just at the wrong moment
- probably a lot of stress for all the dancers, especially as the competition generally is at the end of December, in the middle of long series of performances (on the very evening of the competition, there were performances of "Swan Lake" in Garnier and "La petite danseuse de Degas" in Bastille)
and its positive sides are:
- it forces the dancers to keep a good enough shape to be able to participate in the competition (however, now the participation isn't compulsory. But not participating in the competition would be seen quite badly from the direction, at least for dancers young enough)
- it can be an opportunity for them to perform some variations which haven't been danced for a while by the company (e.g. some dancers regulary choose variations by Lifar, while Lifar has been sadly absent from the company's performances for years)
- it gives them some opportunities to perform soloist variations on stage, and to show what they can do
And indeed, as sophia wrote, the dancers themselves insisted on keeping the competition when Nureyev wanted to suppress it, so even though they often criticize it a lot, a majority do want to keep that typical POB tradition.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):