Jump to content


Anne Bass leaves SAB Boardarticle in The Observer


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

#1 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 10:59 AM

Thanks to Mark D for sennding this link to me. (It's to the homepage, but you'll notice a large Nutcracker. Click on him to get to the article, taking care to notice his visage.)

Nutcracked

Here's the permalink:

Nutcracked

This is old news -- Ms. Bass resigned in September -- but I don't think there was anything in the press about it.  (Or did I miss a story in the Times?)  Lots of history here.

And finally, it is Mr. Martins—and his leadership of the school and the company—that she blames for her exit.

“For me, [the New York City Ballet] feels irrelevant now,” Ms. Bass told The Observer. “It seemed like such an integral part of life years ago.”

In her resignation letter, she was more specific.

“Over the past few years, my escalating concerns over serious issues of governance made it impossible for me to continue,” she began. “I am no longer willing to support an institution that increasingly bears so little resemblance to the one that George Balanchine and Lincoln Kirstein bequeathed to their successors, and to which I have been committed for over twenty years since my Chairmanship of the 50th Anniversary campaign in 1984.”



#2 zerbinetta

zerbinetta

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 680 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 11:34 AM

"Dashing & tempestuous", eh? Grey eyes? Don't think so.

Lovely photo of Darci, though.

#3 atm711

atm711

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,422 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 12:15 PM

That underwear must have been awfully big on Ms. Watts.....

#4 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 12:24 PM

I can't comment on the details, but it seems that -- even though Ms. Bass's fortune is based in Fort Worth -- the affairs of the SAB and NYCB owe a great deal to story lines from "Dallas."

Also, as I struggled to make sense of the dreadful writing and disorganization of this piece (eg: "It was in January of this year that ..." "Finally, it was ___ who replaced ___". "It would be _____ who... ") the thought occurred to me: does the New York Observer employ copy editors?

#5 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 12:42 PM

[D]oes the New York Observer employ copy editors?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Couldn't get in due to transit strike? :wink:

Short staffing on site is a real possibility, but wouldn't most employees internet access?

#6 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 12:44 PM

Would it be possible, just once, to have a discussion on the substantive points of an article? Just a thought.

#7 dewdrop

dewdrop

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 82 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 01:04 PM

eom.

#8 Anthony_NYC

Anthony_NYC

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 290 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 01:14 PM

The comment from Villella surprised me, with its implicit criticism of Martins, since I was under the impression the two of them were friends (or at least enjoyed a good professional relationship). But I'm very glad he made it. From my own depressing experiences at other organizations, I'd say it's hard to know, even from this lengthy article, what really is going on with the board, though things certainly don't sound good. But one thing is clear: currently, nobody is addressing (*can* address?) such a fundamental problem as the lack of coaching, in Balanchine's company, from Balanchine's own dancers. It breaks my heart.

#9 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 01:31 PM

Anthony, I also wish the artistic issues were aired. And they never are, because the media doesn't care about ballet enough to air the issues (much more interesting to stir the dirt. There's nastiness here -- some Source threw mud anywhere it would stick, each story dutifully checked and included.) But if something like this had happened in something important -- say, table tennis or rhythmic gymnastics, much less football or the stock market -- it would have been covered thoroughly in all the major news media.

If all politics is local, arts politics is nearly always very local: i.e., personal. Someone has a disagreement, perhaps, but then there's an Issue that pushes them over the wall and they resign -- leaving their spot to be filled by someone who will most likely share the views that the Leaver is leaving to protest. I think the School would be able to defend disciplining a student who was disruptive (which seems to be the Issue here, although the workshop was several months before the resignation). There must have been other policy issues. How much say do donors have in either day to day operations or general policy? How much do Board members?

#10 dirac

dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,892 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 01:54 PM

Well......I don’t know how much food for serious discussion there is here (“dashing and tempestuous playboy,” etc.) bart has a point -- one is distracted by the poor writing and organization. It seems quite gossipy (although I noted one bit of old gossip left out, which I won’t repeat for obvious reasons), and for the most part, as anthony_nyc notes, it’s he-said-she-said stuff – very hard to judge on the basis of the article what happened. I'm not necessarily complaining -- I like a bit of dish as much as the next person -- but it's hard to take this piece too seriously. Horowitz seems to want to tie in complaints about the company’s dancing with the Bass departure, but the complaints have been around a very long time. Not everyone likes the way Martins runs the company. He has a lot of old girlfriends. People he fired don’t like him. And so forth.


That underwear must have been awfully big on Ms. Watts.....


atm711, I fear I had the very same thought. Safety pins? a belt, perhaps?

I was posting simultaneously with Alexandra, and I agree with her comments. It's unfortunate that Horowitz didn't seem to be very interested in the issues she raised....

Edited by dirac, 21 December 2005 - 01:55 PM.


#11 drb

drb

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,508 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 01:58 PM

The great teacher Wilhelm Burmann certainly DID address key artistic issues. The section of the article involving his teaching of a City Ballet ballerina concludes with:

Mr. Burmann explained how Balanchine “didn’t just teach the student and dancers; he elevated them, he developed them. “You need a director, a coach, and that is a little bit lacking now,” he said.
Like many of his critics, Mr. Burmann said that Mr. Martins seemed resistant to bringing in the great dancers of the past to help the younger generation. “Now they are so insecure in their position that they don’t surround themselves with equals or even betters,” he said of artistic directors generally.

#12 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 02:12 PM

The comment from Villella surprised me, with its implicit criticism of Martins, since I was under the impression ghe two of them were friends (or at least enjoyed a good professional relationship).

I am trying to recall the source, but I know I've read this statement by Villella -- or something almost identical -- in another publication within the last 6 months. Will try to track it down.

#13 dirac

dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,892 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 02:56 PM

I also remember Villella expressing similar sentiments previously -- can't recall when, unfortunately.

#14 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,026 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 04:00 PM

This isn't the first time that Villella has said something contrary to the PC line. After Dancing on My Grave was published, he argued that Gelsey Kirkland should not be ostracized for writing the book, which was far from a popular view at the time.

When Anne Bass said, “I am no longer willing to support an institution that increasingly bears so little resemblance to the one that George Balanchine and Lincoln Kirstein bequeathed to their successors, and to which I have been committed for over twenty years since my Chairmanship of the 50th Anniversary campaign in 1984,” it was interesting that the reported final straw came when her sponsored pupil threw a tantrum, since Kirstein ignored less than stellar behavior when he thought a student was talented, even attributing part of his/her talent to the larger-than-life temperament. In general, places of employment and schools have processes by which students/employees are warned over time, and when no one else is endangered by bad behavior, it's usually not the first infraction that gets someone kicked out. When it is, there's often a swift reaction, up to a lawsuit.

In my opinion, the substantive points in the article are not artistic. I think just about anyone who has worked in an office can recognize -- in Mr. Horowitz' portrayal -- Mr. Bellas as a type who takes reports out of context and cites documentation that contradict other copies of the same in order to further his aims, and Mr. Martins as a leader whose reasoning is belied by the paper trail. The situation is the standard-issue political one: the people in power say "good riddance" to those who aren't in line with them, and the people who are unhappy talk about the abuse of power. The people in this case have incredible amounts of money and power, and unlike former employees who don't necessarily have the same, are less likely to be politic -- or be silenced by the terms of severance agreements -- when discussing the situation.

#15 zerbinetta

zerbinetta

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 680 posts

Posted 21 December 2005 - 04:00 PM

What is most disturbing is for a self syled high falutin' publication such as the Observer to dig up all this old dirt & regurgitate it as though it has something to do with the subject of the article.

I'm surprised they didn't throw Frances Schreuder in there while they were at it.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):