Jump to content


Sleeping Beauty: Florine, part 2who changed the STEPS?


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Paul Parish

Paul Parish

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,922 posts

Posted 05 December 2005 - 10:27 PM

Sylvy started an EXCELLENT thread about bird-like arms in Florine's variation -- to wit, the ballerina uses her back, arms, and wrists as if she were flying, in the oldest versions of Florine's variation -- i.e., the Royal Ballet's, based on Sergeyev's notations -- which are left out in the current Russian versions.

There's another difference in the variations, though -- in the Sergeyev version, she hops on pointe while folding the working leg through from croise devant to efface arabesque. In the Russian version, she enveloppes the working leg to retire, then steps onto that foot and lifts the OTHER leg into croise derierre .

Who is responsible for the Russian choreography? Others may disagree, but personally I find it fussy: rhythmically and pictorially much less lovely.

#2 Mel Johnson

Mel Johnson

    Diamonds Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,311 posts

Posted 06 December 2005 - 05:10 AM

A lot depends on which Russian version you see. The present Maryinsky version is Konstantin Sergeyev's, while the Bolshoi makes use of some things tipped in by Gorsky. A very old version of this pas de deux was taught by Nijinska, and she had the Princess do ballonné sur la pointe to croisé devant, then passing back to one done to effacé derriere. Still had the fluttery hands, though. I have a feeling we're seeing the same kind of thing on a smaller scale that happened to the end of Swan Lake. Rothbart doesn't die because his magic is destroyed, he dies because Siegfried tears his wing off. Florine doesn't flutter because that would be too much like Politically Incorrect magic.

#3 Hans

Hans

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,104 posts

Posted 06 December 2005 - 03:36 PM

Even though the Sergeyev is not what Petipa did--I believe Doug mentioned that the Royal Ballet's version is closer to the notation--I like it, I suppose because it's what I'm used to.

Just thinking aloud, perhaps the confusion that Florine is a bird started because of the hand-fluttering?

#4 Mel Johnson

Mel Johnson

    Diamonds Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,311 posts

Posted 06 December 2005 - 07:05 PM

My first exposure to Bluebird was via RB, so I prefer that way of doing it.

I think that you're correct about the confounding of human and avian characteristic, Hans.

#5 silvy

silvy

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 485 posts

Posted 07 December 2005 - 03:07 AM

Another very strange thing about this pdd:

I noticed that Kirov version (as danced by Pankova; Asylmulatova is Aurora), Pankova does not do any hand fluterring; only listens, BUT she wears a feather on her head!! Why should she wear a feather if she is not a bird at all, but a princess with no "avian characteristics" (as Mr. Mel so funnily expresses)???

:D

#6 Hans

Hans

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,104 posts

Posted 07 December 2005 - 09:19 PM

Can't explain that one.

#7 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 07 December 2005 - 10:31 PM

A token from her friend? :dunno:

#8 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Emeralds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,636 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 02:58 AM

Identity crisis? :dunno:

#9 atm711

atm711

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,402 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 10:52 AM

I wish I knew which version Alicia Alonso danced those many years ago at Ballet Theatre. (I suspect Dolin had a hand in it). Alonso was a regal ballerina--a Princess--and there was none of that hand fluttering, which makes me shudder everytime it is overdone. She had the manner of an Aurora.

#10 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,310 posts

Posted 08 December 2005 - 12:48 PM

Why should she wear a feather if she is not a bird at all, but a princess with no "avian characteristics" (as Mr. Mel so funnily expresses)???

Most of the ladies in a 19th-century audience would have been wearing feather headdresses, etc. -- so ... why not?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):