Natalia OsipovaBolshoi dancer
#16
Posted 22 August 2006 - 08:43 AM
#17
Posted 22 August 2006 - 08:46 AM
drb, on Aug 22 2006, 03:39 PM, said:
Her jumps are unbelivable and her turns great. She is also a lovely actress.
I look forward to see her again!!!
#18
Posted 22 August 2006 - 09:50 AM
I recently added a small gallery of studio shots.
#19
Posted 20 January 2008 - 03:54 PM
#20
Posted 21 January 2008 - 11:16 AM
Quote
I received four text messages during the intermission, one of them from my mother. They were all asking if I was alright.
Indeed, just seeing it on YouTube made a great impression on me.
#21
Posted 21 January 2008 - 12:38 PM
#22
Posted 21 January 2008 - 12:44 PM
cygneblanc, on Jan 21 2008, 03:38 PM, said:
I've only watched her on video (so I'm very envious of you!), but just wanted to say thats a comment (usually phrased as a criticism, though you aren't really doing so) that I see repeated about her often, but don't actually see.
Yes she jumps higher than just about any woman, so perhaps thats "masculine", but otherwise I don't see much at all "masculine" about her style.
The same is not true about Alexandrova who does strike me as such, though I'm not particularly sure why.
I know you were comparing her to Guillem as to her solidity (a comparison that hadn't really occurred to me, but I can see where you are coming from), but i see Osipova as possessing much more joy in her movement than Guillem seemed to express (I have seen her live, but only rarely).
#23
Posted 21 January 2008 - 01:34 PM
#24
Posted 21 January 2008 - 03:21 PM
cygneblanc, on Jan 21 2008, 04:34 PM, said:
I know--sorry if it made it sound like you were saying otherwise.
I just hear that said alot (how masculine she is) and wanted to respond to that.
#25
Posted 22 January 2008 - 07:15 AM
Having seen both Osipova and Alexandrova on stage many times I have never detected anything masculine in either. This line of criticism about these two dancers originates from what I consider the 'deranged elements' that post on the mainly unmoderated Russian language forums. Personally I don't see a powerful technique as unfeminine.
#26
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:47 AM
Mashinka, on Jan 22 2008, 10:15 AM, said:
You've got that right, Mashinka. Interestingly enough, those 'deranged elements' (or should it be singular?) tend to be the same person(s) who constantly prop-up The Gymnast of the Mariinsky. Coincidence?
#27
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:57 AM
Quote
Ballet is out-and-out sexist, I'm afraid. Why put ballerinas in tutus? Why make them dance on pointe? Why expect them to hide their powerful technique behind the air of fragility and delicacy?
I understand what previous posters mean when they remark that Alexandrova and Osipova have a "masculinity" about their dancing. That's not to say they are masculine, just not what we normally expect from ballerinas in romantic/classical ballets. In Alexandrova's case I think this comes about because of her commanding presence and maybe also because her arms aren't as long and quite as beautifully shaped as those of other Bolshoi ballerinas (although she puts them to their full use and can be surprisingly lyrical with them).
Osipova posesses a delightful girlish air, so I can only imagine it is her powerful technique and (comparatively) short/stocky figure that gives makes her more "masculine" than other ballerinas. And hey, there's nothing wrong with that! I get very tired of seeing the "dying swan" types all the time!
#28
Posted 22 January 2008 - 09:12 AM
UK National Dance Awards
On the side of this, it would also help if people stopped judging and criticising dancers on the strength a few crappy youtube clips or a DVD. They are interesting to a certain degree as recordings documenting a performance or a dancer, but they can never replace the live performance.
#29
Posted 22 January 2008 - 10:13 AM
Ostrich, on Jan 22 2008, 11:57 AM, said:
Quote
Ballet is out-and-out sexist, I'm afraid. Why put ballerinas in tutus? Why make them dance on pointe? Why expect them to hide their powerful technique behind the air of fragility and delicacy?
I understand what previous posters mean when they remark that Alexandrova and Osipova have a "masculinity" about their dancing. That's not to say they are masculine, just not what we normally expect from ballerinas in romantic/classical ballets.
But I have to disagree about sexism. As you say, what we expect when we watch female dancers is what we've usually seen from female dancers -- expectations are based on experience, not sexism or a gender equal point of view. We know that women look especially pretty in tutus. And we know that men are by and large stronger physically; and that difference is a source of physical attraction for both men and women, which is why Mika Brezhinski on MSNBC can playfully pretend to strangle Joe Scarborough, and not the other way around. Relative physical fragility (or, in this case, the appearance of fragility) and delicate manners are lovely qualities in women, and so as we know the convention in ballet is for women (and to some degree for men to hide), to make dancing look easy rather than a show of strength.
It's sexist to insist that all women be this way or to take those qualities as an excuse for patriarchy, but I don't think it's sexist to have a taste for one over the other in ballet, no more than it is to prefer Martha Graham to, say, what Patricia McBride might have looked like in Graham roles.
#30
Posted 22 January 2008 - 10:39 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



