Costumes: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Posted 20 July 2005 - 04:54 AM
NYCB wore some truly hideous costumes for the ballet Twyla Tharp choreographed to Beethoven's 7th Symphony.
Posted 08 September 2005 - 04:18 PM
I also don't like tutus that are really huge stiff platters. I like the ones that are a little smaller in diameter and a little bit floppy so that the dancer's torso flows into the skirt smoothly while still maintaining the ballerina look.
On the other hand, my favorite tutus are the red Don Q ones. I also am a sucker for the Indian costumes from Bayadere. Very unique for a ballet.
Posted 10 September 2005 - 03:51 PM
Any particular production, silvery_stars? (Great name, by the way!)
On the other hand, my favorite tutus are the red Don Q ones.
I'm actually getting awfully tired of women's bare midriffs. Most of today's dancers are so thin that their bony ribs tend to be the focus of attention, and to an unflattering effect. But I enjoy harem pants, especially when they drape softly and move well.
I also am a sucker for the Indian costumes from Bayadere. Very unique for a ballet.
Welcome to BalletTalk, silvery_stars! I hope you'll introduce yourself on our Welcome Page.
Posted 10 September 2005 - 05:21 PM
I wonder: where did that style originate? And why? I guess I'm used to the look, but a non-fan once told me that it looked like the dancer had stepped halfway through a frisbie.
I also don't like tutus that are really huge stiff platters.
Posted 10 September 2005 - 06:11 PM
Don't wait for my answer--it's R-rated!
My favourite description is a Q-Tip twirling around with a dinner plate.....
Or the flying saucer-school of uptilted tutus.....
Seriously, there are many descriptions of tutus online.....different ballets call for different styles, and different companies have their own "look" which sometimes changes over the years......
Very sketchily, in a nutshell, for classical tutus:
Softer, large, almost-bell shaped tutus are used in historical reconstructions of late 19th-early 20th c. ballets (Maryinsky Sleeping Beauty) or to mimic the look of same but with a more contemporary feel (ABT Ballet Imperial corps costumes.)
English: "classical" shape, but not tacked together really tightly and angled somewhat more softly toward the leg...the tutu moves somewhat with the dancer...
Karinska/NYCB/"Balanchine: shorter skirt, more movement and less stiffness, sometimes fewer layers, tacked more loosely...
"Russian"--wider plate (size of the skirt diameter), usually tacked more tightly, sometimes enough so it resembles a pancake, higher cut leg.
These are gross generalizations, but it is a complicated topic, and everyone finds their own look that they prefer.....
Posted 10 September 2005 - 07:57 PM
Posted 10 September 2005 - 08:13 PM
When this was first pointed out to me, I immediately pictured the transported expression Martine van Hamel had as she "watched" her feet doing those tricky, fast steps in her "Theme and Variations" variation, and realizing . . . all she saw was tutu!!!
By the way, for those of you who have never worn one, imagine doing something complicated with your legs and feet and not being able to SEE them sometimes!
Posted 11 September 2005 - 11:05 AM
Posted 04 October 2005 - 07:52 PM
And what does everyone think of Gelsey Kirkland's Don Quixote costume, the one she hated? I like it except for those wings...
Posted 05 October 2005 - 04:48 PM
OTOH, I hated the long sleeves on her Bayadere (Shades) costume. I suppose they were supposed to substitute for the scarf that each corps dancer had, draping from the base of her headpiece and wafting along the upper arm, elbow and wrist. Just didn't do it, IMO.
Posted 05 October 2005 - 05:24 PM
I'm not sure which costume (act?) you refer to, Violet, but Gelsey's costume for Giselle Act II was extraordinary. The skirt was made of fabric so light it actually wafted -- not so much to obscure her dancing, but accentuating her milkweed quality.
Well, in Dancing on My Grave, Kirkland described being extremely impressed with Carla Fracci's act 2 Giselle costume and she slipped in Fracci's dressing room and snipped a piece off. She found out it was silk tulle.
She doesn't go any further than than, but draw whatever conclusion you will.
I didn't see Kirkland as Giselle but I did see Fracci quite a few times. The tutu was huge and very cloudlike. It was very much a part of her portrayal and made a big impact. Talk about atmosphere.....
Posted 05 October 2005 - 05:42 PM
Posted 05 October 2005 - 06:42 PM
In the '70s, there was a series of small booklets -- about 16 pages, mostly photos -- devoted to several dancers. Jacques d'Amboise's had a photo of him as the Firebird prince holding Gelsey overhead, she in a pas de chat vole position. You can see the crotch panel of her tights.
Otherwise, the Chagall creation is exquisite -- brilliantly colored, extravagant, as filled with fantasy as any of his other works.
Posted 05 October 2005 - 07:33 PM
"Any excuse why any tutu would not cover the wearer's rear at least to the leg-line?"
If the tutu was not built for the dancer, it's entirely possible that it won't fit properly--ride up, droop, give wedgies, etc. All rear ends are not the same and all wardrobe departments don't have the time or resources to correct fit on every dancer for costumes that are worn by many.
In a custom tutu, no, there's no excuse.
Kirkland's Giselle costume was wonderful--I shamelessly used it as a model when I designed a production some time ago. There are varieties of tulle, different weights, and layers of a fine/silk will give the thistledown quality which we hope will be echoed in the dancing.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users