Lawsuit against Vaganova Academy
Posted 28 February 2005 - 11:34 AM
I've been hearing unofficially about this case from friends & family in Petersburg, for a while, but could not post anything, due to our no-gossip policy. At least the story of this case is finally in print so...voila! I'll just present this & keep further details to myself.
Interesting that this is happening, no? Perhaps this is a sign that Rule of Law & 'democracy' live in Russia? Your thoughts & comments, please.
[linked article in Russian]
Posted 28 February 2005 - 12:35 PM
p.s. - I know that our copyright-quotation rules are such that we can show (copy) only a small percentage of each article, regardless of language. Hence, I'm afraid that, even with a complete English translation, we can give you only a small 'sampler' of each article.
Posted 28 February 2005 - 03:17 PM
Why important girls do not take in ballerina? 28/02/2005 13:18 The academy of the Russian ballet im. Agripina vaganovoy to represent there is no need whatever. In the building on architect Rossi's street almost one-and-a-half century hearth with one roof were located the school and the rehearsal base of emperor ballet company (ballet Of mariinskogo theater). Human passions, talent and inspiration feed the newest history Of vaganovki, in each release of which ignites new ballet asterisk. Therefore so strangely and absurdly appears that judicial dispute, into which proved to be pulled the academy of ballet, which today attack claims some parents of pupils, deducted for "profneprigodnost'". Initiative to this judicial lawsuit placed the mother of 14- summer To nasti by Kowalevski (name of girl for the ethical considerations changed), who after two years of instruction in the academy was deducted by the transfer into the general education school with the formulation "absence of professional abilities and prospect for their development".
See what I mean? (You should see what happens when I feed it Shakespeare...)
Posted 28 February 2005 - 04:04 PM
As students grow and hormonal changes occur, physiques can become unacceptable for a life in ballet. Even specialists cannot predict how a child will change in 2, 3, and 5 years. The parents are told that there will be a trial period when their child is accepted. Only around 50% will finish the full course. The regulations of the Academy define these criteria, and the children are assessed accordingly as they go through their training. Weeding-out of students is based on physical, psychological, and creative abilities.
This child's mother presented the counter argument that her daughter's transfer is against the laws of all educational establishments governed by the state. She said that the Vaganova Academy states that their job is to prepare artists for the Maryinsky Theatre. However, this mother says her child does not want to dance at the Maryinsky. Maybe she wants to choose another company, or maybe she will teach.
It was also said that this child's foot was found to be wanting in the "arch" department, and that it would be overtaxed as the work got technically harder. The Academy says that teachers and physicians should not continue with the professional training of this child in order to prevent future foot problems.
Posted 28 February 2005 - 06:07 PM
Of course, I am well aware that this lawsuit is different for obvious reasons--i.e., it's not San Francisco, it's not even the USA! Was the author of the article merely reporting the facts or editorializing on the matter? What are the particulars of the local legal and judicial system as they apply to this lawsuit?
Posted 01 March 2005 - 08:47 AM
This is different than the San Fco case, as weight is not cited as a specific issue. It has to do more with the girl's feet, although other factors may have come into play.
I'm not knowledgeable about the local education law, sorry.
The other talk regarding this case -- and I'll try to stay on the correct side of our 'no gossip' rule & be really general -- has to do with a two-tiered "Paying Foreigners - versus - Ordinary Non-Paying Russians" system in play at this school. Were any foreign students with no-arch feet (or similar physical imperfections) allowed to continue on to the next class?
Should Vaganova Academy students of wealthy, tuition-paying non-Russian parents be subject to the same strict weening-out rules that apply to the non-paying locals? Some argue that because those foreigners KNOW that they have no chance of attaining a contract with the Mariinsky upon graduation, they should be allowed to pay their money 'til the end, perform in the nice graduation concert, get their nice high-school diploma, then say "Da Svidanya" & return to their country of origin. Others argue that the imperfect foreigners are taking up 'spots' in the classroom that could be taken by Russians with no fewer imperfections than those foreigners.
This has been the subject of heated discussions among St. Petersburg balletomanes even before the 'Kowalevsky Case' appeared.
[p.s. - Just because a graduate is a foreigner doesn't mean that s/he is a 'slacker'. For ex., the very latest graduation class (June 2004) included a foreigner who, by many accounts, was the most talented girl in the bunch -- Nanami Terai of Japan, a student of Tayana Terekhova. Terai was the star of the Vaganova Academy's production of 'Sylvia' one year earlier (2003). She's quite spectacular.]
Posted 01 March 2005 - 09:20 AM
In official schools of US ballet companies, a similar issue is raised pretty consistently: are the daughters of wealthy contributors taking up spaces that should go to more "deserving" candidates? (While these schools are considered "private", they are subsidized publically by direct government subsidies and by foundation grants and corporate donors from tax-exempt earnings.)
Two differences between US schools and state-sponsored schools are :
1. There has only been one way into the state-sponsored academies, especially for girls, and that is as a young child, whereas at School of American Ballet, for example, the pre-professional classes are comprised mainly by students from all over the country who audition as young teenagers, and had their formative training elsewhere. Not many of the kids who start at 8-year-olds make it into the Pre-professional ranks. At PNB school, for example, there is a separate, non-professional track for those students who want to continue.
2. State-sponsored schools are "free" for citizens, while US elite academies assume tuition. One way to not accept a student is to not give a scholarship or subsidy.
No one really blinks in higher academia when Harvard, for example, sets aside 25% of its freshman class each year for "legacy" students (children of alumni.)
Posted 02 March 2005 - 06:43 AM
Having been a foreign teacher, who did attend two years of study at the Vaganova Academy, perhaps there may be a different look inside than the article discusses, although my experiences may differ from those of students now.
There are good foreign students and there are good Russian students. Please note, according to country delineation, S. Sakharova is techinically a foreigner since she is a Ukrainian, not a Russian. Other foreigner are Ti Yon Ru, Korean, graduated 1995 after attending the school for 5 years, Islom Baimuradov, graduated 1994, an Austrian by birth on his mother's side and a Russian father. Islom attended Vaganova Academy the two final years of study.
At the time I was in Russia, 1993-1995, the foreigners were not able to be official members of Mariinsky unless they 1) had Russian heritage or 2) if they married a Russian. The foreigners and other Russian graduates were members of various Russian companies, such as, St. Petersburg Ballet Theatre (Choreographic Miniatures), Maly Theatre, Stanoslovsky, and the Dolgushin company at the Conservatory. The majority of students at the school did not enter the Mariinsky Theatre. There are not enough openings on an annual basis.
There are also, not so good foreign and Russian students alike. At the time I was in school, acceptance to the school was on an annual basis. The foreigners, for the most part did not come from the background of the Russians. It was a struggle for most. The high technical and physical demands, the increased hours of work, the struggle with language, the psychological differences in work ethic, the daily dealings with life, such as buying food, cleaning of apartments, dealing with a transportation system that did not work are a tremendous amount for a non-Russian to deal with. At that time, all foreigners either had completed their high school requirements in their country of origin or were completing their work through coorespondence. The Academy did not grant a high school diploma for academics to the foreigners.
The level of foreign teachers was very high for those of us who attended on a daily basis. We all had to show that we had professional experience as a dancer/teacher for at least 10 years with well-known organizations and come equipped with references out the gazoo. Our examination process was as stringent as the Russian teachers. There were a few teachers who passed through shall we say...by this I mean, paid the $10,000.00 in tuition/living expenses, but did not attend the pedegogy discussions on a daily basis. There is one who came in three times a year, studied for two weeks and took exams and another who was never official enrolled, studied privately for two months and was given a certification. I do not know the ins and outs at all. I am only saying what I observed and know happened.
There is very strict enrollment criteria for foreign students and teachers alike. There are no 12 year old foreign students at Vaganova Academy. There was a non-professional track level of classes being taught to Russian children at the school. It was never clear to me, what these classes were. I observed them on a few occasions and taught the youngest level of 6-8 year olds for six months. These were regularly scheduled classes that took place in the late afternoons. For the most part, the students were treated the same as the professional track students, however their proportions or physical potential were not correct for a career in ballet. These classes never progressed beyond a Russian intermediate level.
Differing rules for foreign students, has more to do with money than talent. There have always been talented foreigners in Vaganova Academy. In the foreign student's office, the walls are filled with success photos of dancers and teachers alike. My late husband was a foreign student at GITIS and Vaganova Academy in the 1960s. There were quite a few German, Polish, Bulgarian, Czech, Chinese, Vietnamese, etc. All of these governments paid money to the Russian government to attend however the students were talented.
There will always be some students more talented than others. How the Russian government will choose to deal in the future with tuition paying students remains to be seen. It is my hope that foreign students will be able to study in the school anyway possible. It can only raise the level of performing and teaching in the countries outside of Russia.
Posted 02 March 2005 - 08:25 AM
Many CIS (territory of former USSR) students at the Vaganova Academy, such as Svetlana Zakharova, attend only the one or two years. It's a sort of finishing school. In those cases, as you point out, they are already near-professional-level artists. Other examples included Igor Zelensky (Tbilisi, Georgia), Mikhail Baryshnikov (Riga, Latvia), and Rudolf Nureyev (Ufa, Tatarstan).
I would not lump those CIS-territory countries with the 'tuition-paying foreigners' group that is the object of such controversies. Rather, I would suggest that the Vaganova Academy has not two but three nationality tracks:
* CIS foreigners (former Soviet Union countries...mostly highly-gifted, mostly non-paying)
* non-CIS foreigners (Japan, Korea, USA, Canada, etc....gifted enough to be there but must pay tuition/room/board)
Posted 02 March 2005 - 09:00 AM
Posted 02 March 2005 - 10:32 AM
Where was Zakharova trained before she went to Petersburg, Natalia?
Zakharova trained in Kiev, Ukraine, Ari. She was spotted by Kirov coaches during the 1995 Vaganova Prix competition for juniors, when she was 16 and won a bronze or silver medal. [The St. Petersburg trained-and-bred Maya Dumchenko won the gold, I recall. Igor Kolb, who won bronze, was another 'Soviet ally' who was spotted by Kirov coaches during that competition; he represented the Minsk, Belarus, academy.]
Posted 02 March 2005 - 12:02 PM
The entrance of Zakharova was at a time that the Ukraine was no longer part of Russia. There were many students from former Soviet block nations who found themselves in limbo as far as nationality and status at the school in 1993. I believe Sakharova entered the fall of 1995. She was not there in the winter of 1994 nor in the spring of 1995. I believe she graduated in the summer of 1996 in the class of Zubkovskaya, but that may not be correct. I ran a search but could not find any biographical information on her.
Posted 02 March 2005 - 12:44 PM
I was there at the time (overlapped with part of your time, actually). Zakharova graduated in spring 1996 in the class of Evteyeva, not Zubkovskaya. Pavlenko was also in Evteyeva's group. Zubkovskaya had Nekipelova, S. Ivanova, & Part, among others.
Actually, I always felt a bit sorry for Daria Pavlenko because she was the 'star' of the class as she grew up, only to have the 'outsider' Zakharova step in & become the unofficial Queen of the 1996 Graduation Class. That's life, though.
Posted 02 March 2005 - 02:26 PM
Well, now I am curious as to who you are. Hum, same time as me...we were only a few!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):