About the transitionFeedback and discussion
Posted 13 January 2005 - 12:27 PM
Some issues brought up:
Should the level of moderation be relaxed? This is a double-edged sword. Less moderation might free up discussion and prompt some more inhibited potential posters to delurk. It also can raise the signal-to-noise ratio and drive substantive posters away. Less active moderation of unsubstantiated personal information (injuries and casting, for instance) might perform a service to the audience that can't get information otherwise. It also could prohibit professionals from posting because of conflicts of interest.
Experts and newbies. Ballet Talk has posters of every level of interest and association from neophyte to balletomane to pro. Sometimes the differences in experience can be inhibiting or frustrating.
Please feel free to add your thoughts, but our questions to the community can be boiled down to two simple questions.
What do you wish would change?
What do you wish would stay the same?
Let us know. If you don’t wish to talk publicly, PM or email myself or another moderator. We’re not looking for compliments; we’re looking for useful information. Tell us what you think.
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:33 PM
In terms of structure, the split between Ballet Talk and Ballet Talk for Dancers... I wish some of the forums on Ballet Talk for Dancers could be moved to Ballet Talk... in particular the Arts Administration and The Pro Shop... I'd like to see the Ballet Talk for Dancers be more involved with what goes on in the studio. Administration and production seem more related to the discussions that go on at Ballet Talk than the pointe shoe and summer intensives discussions that go on at Ballet Talk for Dancers.
It's wonderful to be able to track the most recent posts across the board rather than having to go on a click-safari through each forum. This is what draws me to Ballet Talk rather to a forum like Critical Dance where this sort of overview doesn't seem possible.
None of the above are major issues, but since we're trying to bring up discussion, I thought I'd air them.
Posted 13 January 2005 - 10:00 PM
As for the differing levels of knowledge and experience, that could be addressed by having a forum for newbies to ask questions about what may be for others basic concepts ("What is the plot of La Sylphide?" or "How are ballets passed down?"). As I recall, there was a forum like that for a while, and I thought it was a good idea. If that isn't possible, Gentle Reminders that everyone is at a different level would work, too.
I also like the idea of having an Unsubstantiated Gossip area, with a disclaimer, of course.
Otherwise, I like the format of this board very much.
Posted 13 January 2005 - 11:05 PM
The idea of a "corner" for unsubstantiated information is certainly provocative, and one we never considered. I'd be interested in what others think. My first thoughts regarding it are very cautious; I worry that it's a Pandora's Box.
Re: pseudonyms, especially in the context of posting insider information. The potential for abuse is enormous. Say director Y wouldn't give dancer X a role and dancer X decides to get even. I'd rather more people used their real names rather than fewer.
Ballet Nut, we are working on reviving a forum for those new to ballet. It's the special project of Treefrog - I'm excited about that.
I hope more people will speak. I'd also like to emphasize that I'm giving my opinions here as a board member, not the arbiter. I'm part of a transition, not the absolute power here. What the community wants will determine where the board goes. One word of caution about that. It's not enough to want more intelligent discussion, or news on topics that interest you, or talk on this subject or that. If you want it, you need to participate. You get out of BalletTalk what you put in.
Posted 13 January 2005 - 11:08 PM
Posted 13 January 2005 - 11:21 PM
However, I would remind you you're only 11 posts away from all member privileges anyway. Please join in the discussions - we'd love for you to do so.
Posted 14 January 2005 - 02:42 AM
Posted 14 January 2005 - 04:55 AM
"WARNING! 99% of everything on this forum is crap!"?
Posted 14 January 2005 - 06:41 AM
Posted 14 January 2005 - 07:19 AM
Re a 'gossip forum', if I were involved in ballet on an occupational or professional level, I'd probably be in favour AS LONG AS the rules for courteous discourse - esp. in critiquing dancers - are observed there too
Posted 14 January 2005 - 07:35 AM
As one who has sometimes been "snipped" for gossip, I might be tempted to say that gossip has it's place but maybe, as Alexandra told me, "not here!" However, not all gossip is created equal - apparently - since I once posted an innocuous story of a chat I had with Ben Millepied which was accepted but later when I had a similar chat with Wendy Whelan it was "snipped" even though there was nothing the least bit controversial or "revealing" in my message.
It seems one of the main topics of gossip is injuries or dancers suddenly leaving the company they dance with. This recently came up when Lindy Mandradjiefff - lamentably - left NYCB. When a name suddenly vanishes from the roster it is bound to create interest among the fans of that company. Maybe there is some way to address these questions by personal messaging replies to one another rather than posting any speculation. Some of us already do that.
Also, a bit more clarification about what can or cannot be said about a given dancer might be needed. It seems to be OK to comment if a ballerina is too thin or bony, but not if she is carrying a few extra pounds. Since weight is often a deciding factor in casting, it sometimes explains why certain popular dancers are
not seen in certain roles - or rarely seen at all.
The dancers do read what we write here and they are well aware of their weight problems, shortcomings, declining abilities, etc.
Posted 14 January 2005 - 08:32 AM
Comments on details of a dancer's personal life (ie, X and Y are going out, Z has been living with A) are not permitted except if this information has previously appeared in print or is confirmed by the company. If we are not sure they want this information public, we do not want it in a post.
Unsubstantiated casting or injury information (X is rehearsing this role because Y is out with an ankle injury that happened in class) is not permitted. The reasoning is that this information can harm a situation if we don't know it's public. Maybe the company director might not yet *know* that X is rehearsing a role. Maybe s/he learned it on his or her own and has not yet shown it to the director.
Personnel information (X has been fired) is not permitted, until an announcement has been made by the company or in print. It's a great way to flare up an already bad situation.
We frown on using the dancers as sources. Do they know they're being quoted? If we haven't been consistent on this, it could be that we caught one instance and missed the other, or there may have been another reason.
Comments on a dancer's physical appearance *are* permitted. Ad hominem attacks on a dancer are not. "She is overweight" is permitted. "My God, she's a pig!" is not. "She is too thin" is permitted. "She looks like a Qtip in pointe shoes" is crossing the line. When commenting on a dancer's appearance, I'd suggest informally that you realize that they will hear it and it will inevitably hurt their feelings. It's left to the poster to decide if they should take the effort to phrase things more diplomatically, however, we will intervene if the comment is personal.
These are how the rules have evolved to the present time. Alexandra and I have judged things as they arisen; there are possibilities of inconsistency as you have two different eyes depending on who read the post first. These policies can be changed, that is why we're having this discussion. They were put there to primarily protect companies and dancers from complications of misinformation or rumor, and to protect our professional reputations as well. You may decide that information is worth those complications. But those changes will have their consequences, and that should be discussed.
Posted 14 January 2005 - 11:28 AM
On the other hand, I think the way you restrained flame wars is totally on target. I hope that continues. This board is blessedly free of flames -- quite an achievement -- while allowing people to express opinions.
Posted 15 January 2005 - 07:49 AM
OK, at least this works.
What has happened is that we are, even as I write, in the middle of the changeover which began shortly after 3 PM EST yesterday. Some things work, some things don't yet. I'll keep you all posted as we get developments.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):