Jump to content


New Swan Lake


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#31 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,339 posts

Posted 09 June 2004 - 09:20 AM

"I can't help but wonder if Wheeldon hadn't called it Swan Lake if that might have made a difference to some? "

This occured to me as well. I haven't seen very much of Wheeldon's work, and so I'm not sure how much of my reaction is to his aesthetic and how much is to this particular production, but I have very mixed feelings.

By their nature, story ballets begin with a concept of sorts, so that if you shift some of those elements you change the whole. There are many different productions of SL around, some of which make substantial changes in the story, or the setting, or another aspect of the work. Some of these are very successful, but often it feels like changes are made just for the sake of changing -- dance is such a permeable artform that we have come to expect difference. But most of these versions still cleave to the core elements of SL, especially the magical aspects of the plot. By setting the work in a specific time and place (the Paris of Degas) rather than in a more ephemeral past, and especially by changing the major plot mechanism (the transformative powers of love and magic), Wheeldon has radically shifted the message of the ballet. He has substituted psychology for magic, making a kind of post-Freudean work. In its way, this is a more significant change than Matthew Bourne's work, which doesn't really pretend to be SL, but rather another dance using certain touchstones from the Petipa/Ivanov ballet.

Judging it on its own, Wheeldon's ballet has many attractive elements -- he seems very confident in his manipulation of the corps in the "white" acts. I was sitting on the main floor, but heard from friends above that the geometry of those sections was quite nice. There is an abrupt kind of bouyancy in some of his partnering that reminds me of Ashton (thinking of The Dream, and Oberon's snatching lifts with Titania) but he's also channelling MacMillan's unfortunate tendency to sling women around. Still, there's a firm sense of musicality there -- his waltzes have true momentum without being soporific. And although I don't like the reconceptualized divertisments in act 3, he has a sure hand with vernacular dances.

As Swan Lake, I think this is much less successful. The revisions make the story less important -- if it's all in Siegfried's head then the tragedy is just personal. We feel sorry for him, but we don't identify with him -- he doesn't represent anything universal for us. By taking away the metaphor, it makes the ballet weaker.

Some miscellaneous thoughts:

In a talk for the Dance Critics Association, Wheeldon said that he changed the diverts in act three because he wanted to get away from poorly performed national dances, which I can understand, but three of the new versions (Russian, Spanish and Mazurka/Can-Can) have a kind of low rent night-club act quality that doesn't seem like a good substitute. If he was going for a kind of debauchery, he didn't get far enough. (and the Can-Can dancers need ruffles on their pettipants!)

I wasn't sure how "realistic" the acting was supposed to be. Sometimes it seemed fairly abstract -- indicating rather than experiencing, but then in the fourth act Odette's shoulders were shaking as she wept. It seemed almost too literal.

The set (three walls of ballet studio) felt a bit claustrophobic, making what seems like a small stage even smaller, so that when dancers exited they had to literally go out a door, but in act three, when they brought in tables to make it into a cabaret setting, the swags and flowers on the set decorations linked the stage to the ornate decor of the theater very nicely -- it actually felt less hemmed-in.

#32 socalgal

socalgal

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 286 posts

Posted 09 June 2004 - 11:59 AM

Sandik
I really appreciated reading your insights to Wheeldon's new SL. I do not see it until this weekend. However, from all I have read and heard, I think you have made some extremely valid points. Is it Swan Lake or something else? And what happens to the imagery and symbols of romanticism if it has been replaced by reality? :shrug: I guess I am sensing a loss of poetry here. It does sound like a beautifully crafted production in the similar vein as a well designed Broadway production. Very theatrical. For me, Swan Lake is about the love of beauty and pursuit of that ideal form as mysterious and ehpemeral as it may be. Maybe this SL is for a new generation ..........Can't wait to see for myself :)

#33 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 09 June 2004 - 12:39 PM

There have been lots of reviews of this production, for those looking for a range of opinions. If you haven't seen them, check the Links forum. There have been review links posted every day.

I've just put up the new DanceView Times. There are two reviews, one pro, one con, and several photos.

Go to http://www.danceviewtimes.com You'll see the links to the reviews in the top box on the home page, right column.

#34 dufay

dufay

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 73 posts

Posted 12 June 2004 - 04:26 AM

Not a critic, but "I know what I like".
First, the corps was excellent. The PA Ballet has gone up a couple of notches in our (me and DD) opinion. We saw the cast with Riolama Lorenzo and Zachary Hench. Both were excellent.
The stage at the Academy, not large to begin with, was made even smaller with the pretext of the studio. The backdrop at the end looked more like an ocean- or Lake Superior- than a lake. I did not like the extreme messing with Act III. The Odile pas did not make sense where it was put- there was not a story "flow", and the somewhat over the top Russian/Spanish/can can dances I thought were more for audience than contributed anything to the overall drama.

Kevin McKenzie was in the audience (and had better seats than us!). Would love to know what he thought.

#35 purelyballet

purelyballet

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 131 posts

Posted 17 June 2004 - 04:24 PM

I have been extrememly busy since I returned home from PA. but I wanted to add a quick reply to the many other comments on Chris Wheeldon's new Swan Lake. I actually went to PA with the expectations of not liking this new version of a classic. However, after seeing it four times (so that I could see all casts), I have to say I LOVED it. Rio was by far my favorite as Odette, but to be honest all of the dancers were lovely. Special kudos certainly must go to the corps. These young ladies danced as one. They are certainly among the best corps dancers that I have seen in years. Both Chris and the corps have a lot to be proud of. Thanks for the fabulous entertainment....I can't wait to come and see the company again next season. :wink:

#36 socalgal

socalgal

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 286 posts

Posted 21 June 2004 - 01:01 PM

:flowers: Congratulations to all at PABallet for this incredible new version of Swan Lake.
Prior to actually seeing the ballet, I shivered in my shoes for PAB taking such risk in staging an old classic with a new contemporary vision. This is not normally their style....and the risks were many. The company rose to and beyond the task at hand and Mr. Wheeldon made a ballet for them that more than suit this talented group. Since the sets were made for traveling, let's hope it travels far and wide! This is a Swan Lake worth viewing - and more than once if you want to catch all the details. It may not be all things to all people, but then what version is?

Brava to Dede Barfield for her last performance with PAB. Her performance captured my heart.
:wub: Alexei Borovik was her soulful partner and the two of them were magical together.

The corps danced brilliantly and the production itself is amazing - sets, costumes, lighting design.

:wink:

#37 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 22 June 2004 - 12:34 PM

Does anyone know if Robert G. reviewed Wheeldon's Swan Lake in the WSJ?

And if so, is there a link?

Thanks,
Ray

#38 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 22 June 2004 - 12:58 PM

Hi, Ray!

He did review it, but it's not on line, unfortunately. (It may be, but you can only access the site if you're a paid subscriber.) I think an excerpt was posted on Links when it came out -- I'll try and find it for you.

#39 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 22 June 2004 - 12:59 PM

Copied over from Links:

Robert Greskovic reviews Christopher Wheeldon's new "Swan Lake" in the Wall Street Journal today; it's available on line only to subscribers, but here's a sample:

Mr. Wheeldon strays further than most from the so-called traditional staging. He locates his "Swan Lake" narrative not in the mythic, Germanic climes of its original setting, but in Edgar Degas's late-19th-century Paris. His leading characters have many of the names found in the 1877 outline -- Prince Siegfried, The Queen, Von Rothbart-- but at times these same individuals double as nameless dancers or ballet world figures who might be depicted in Degas's pictures. Mr. Wheeldon also tweaks and cuts Tchaikovsky's admittedly sprawling score in order to support his scheme for showing "Swan Lake" as a fantastical dream framed by the world of 19th-century Parisian ballet.

Along the way, unfortunately, audiences are left to wonder where the action is taking them as the dance scenes and choreographic numbers take place, now within the walls of a ballet studio fixed with a large, framed mirror, and then in a dappled interior where light passes through the walls and the doorways open onto choppy water reminiscent of some eerie Edward Hopper painting. Mr. Wheeldon's reworking of the ballet's story, setting and characters, demands concentration that often confounds the audience and distracts from the dancing itself. This is a problem, because in many instances his choreography proves impressive. His great strength in this work is with grouping and animating the swan-maiden ensemble, which he does with a delicate touch that creates effects both eye-catching and moving.



#40 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 23 June 2004 - 07:19 AM

Sorry, Alexandra, I don't find it--and I'm looking in both the June 22 and June 23 eds. of the WSJ.

Ray

#41 Ray

Ray

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts

Posted 23 June 2004 - 07:24 AM

Sorry again: I realize now that "today" is copied from an earlier post. Do you happen to know what day it appeared?

No sweat if not; I woulnd't have to look through that many in my local library.

RR

#42 Dale

Dale

    Emeralds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,019 posts

Posted 23 June 2004 - 07:30 AM

June 9.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):