Posted 05 December 2003 - 10:09 AM
Posted 06 December 2003 - 11:44 AM
no, I have not been at the Lulu Permiere last night. I am still sick home.
I have read the first review today and it sounded very very positive, not to say
exciting. I will try and translate it into English and then post it here.
Regards from Stuttgart
Posted 06 December 2003 - 03:37 PM
Here's hoping you feel better very soon. The translated review would be greatly appreciated so long as it is not too much trouble for you.
Posted 06 December 2003 - 04:54 PM
Hope you feel better soon, and I too would be VERY interested in hearing abut Lulu, bitte.
Posted 07 December 2003 - 05:49 AM
Posted 07 December 2003 - 08:52 AM
recover so much sooner. At least I hope so...
Here I have tried to translate the first review of Stuttgarts newest Ballet:
LULU. Eine Monstretragödie by Christian Spuck
The review is by Horst Koegler, the most famous man for ballett-reviews here.
As said above, I have tried to translate it. My English is far away from good. So
please forgive me the mistakes.
It’s done! The big and important break through in the career of Christian Spuck, resident choreographer of the Stuttgart Ballet.
With his ‘Lulu. Eine Monstretragödie’, Ballet in two acts, free after Frank Wedekind he can be named in one line with the great acting-ballet choreographers like Noverre and legitimate successor of John Cranko and John Neumeier.
This man can tell a story, very concrete, with pure dance and absolutely no pantomimic help. He can suggest dramatically situations, can characterise persons, can choreograph big room conquering ensembles and can give a multiple adapted literary work a new and characteristic profile.
This all may sound not very progressive and innovative but proofs the sovereign mastery of his work and has become very, very rare nowadays.
With his dramatic producer Rüdiger Nolte he brought back Wedekinds material to its source, the theatres of the suburbs, the fairs.
A big part of this success was the choice of the music: Shostakovich (film-music’s, ballet-suites), Schönberg and Berg. Contacted by James Tuggle and brilliantly played by the Stuttgart State Orchestra.
Breathtaking the choreographic dramatically access Spucks in the countless, sometimes even forced, original Pas-de-deux-combinations and especially in the big, superb structured corps-ensembles. There is such an escalating drive; this is Stuttgart Ballet at its best!
What still could be done is to sharpen the individual character profiles. Here in the roles of the painter (Jorge Nozal), Dr. Schön (Ivan Gil Ortega), Alwa (Marijn Rademaker) and the both London-suitors (Damiano Pettenella and Dimitri Magitov) as marvellous they are danced in Stuttgart.
Christian Spuck proofs that he has the gift for an individual choreographic character-portraitist with the drawing of the roles of Lulu, Gräfin (Countess) von Geschwitz, von Schigolch and Jack he Ripper.
Alicia Amatriain is a wonderful, extremely expressive Lulu: a childlike naïve bitch a la Lolita and a cunning snake but everything she does is surrounded with an aura of world-tired melancholy.
This aura of melancholy is with Bridget Breiners Gräfin von Geschwitz intensified into tragicalness, in a burning frustration.
The character of Eric Gauthiers Schigloch is not easily to be seen but he dances with an exploding dramatically presents.
Jiri Jelinek as Jack the Ripper shows his great acting talent, a mystery man, an angel of death.
Rodrigo, a lover was powerfully danced by Jason Reilly.
What an ensemble – no other company here dances with such an attack, with such an animalism lust, such an élan.
What a ballet-highlight, what a pleasure to live in a city that can call such a ballet-company its own.
Posted 07 December 2003 - 03:28 PM
Greatly appreciate your effort re the review of Lulu. DD said it was lots of work but great fun. Eager to hear your review when you are able to attend.
Posted 12 December 2003 - 06:41 AM
Financial Times by Larry L Lash
Lulu, Christian Spuck's first full-length ballet, starts out so strong, it's almost too good to be true.
The Stuttgart Ballet's young resident choreographer successfully mixes elements of Tanztheater, a striking modern ballet vocabulary, and enough narrative (freely adapted from the Wedekind play on which Alban Berg based his opera) to appease traditionalists.
Spuck's fascinating combinations are dazzlingly fast, combining classical fireworks and some of the most original choreography since William Forsythe stepped out of the Stuttgart corps. There is nothing extraneous in Spuck's movement: it is non-stop and speaks volumes.
[edited by AT]
Posted 12 December 2003 - 07:13 AM
Thank you for posting these, but I had to trim the quotes from the Financial Times review since that was published in English. We have to be careful because of copyright laws -- we can link to reviews in newspapers and magazines, and quote about 250 words, but no more than that. I think we could get away with the Koegler review, because that is your translation, but we can't for an English review.
If you find other reviews in English, please post a link!
Posted 13 December 2003 - 12:56 AM
I can;'t wait to hear more.
Just thinking about it, Lulu seems to be the likeliest subject for an extended ballet in quite some time. Ever since you posted, ive been going around singing "Bang bang Maxwell's Silver Hammer,' and realizing I was thinking about "Lulu."
Posted 13 December 2003 - 12:56 AM
Posted 29 December 2003 - 09:42 AM
will you also be dancing in Endstation Sehnsucht?
Posted 28 January 2004 - 05:00 AM
I also liked the idea of “multiplying” Lulu in two scenes of both acts, as well as the idea to introduce the TV-screen instead of a conventional portrait of the heroine, needed in the story.
Once again I want to stress that the quality of dancing was superb. Alicia Amatriain’s technique and physical abilities are really outstanding (does she have any bone joints?). I’ve seen her once at a gala in Moscow – she was dancing a pdd from “In the Middle…”. Impressive, but the full-length ballet is another story! Bridget Breiner was impressive not only in her dancing and acting, but also in singing (was it really her own voice? :rolleyes: ).
What really created mixed feelings is the choice of music - I mean the Shostakovich pieces. It doesn't mean at all that I don't like it's quality -it's just brilliant and 100% made for dancing (mostly from ballets “The Limpid Stream” and “Bolt”). The problem is that these pieces have no decadent mood suitable for the story. For me it sounds too Soviet, too optimistic, etc. I know that one of the waltzes was used also in the Kubrick’s film “Eyes Wide Shut”., but it also seems strange to me. May be the way I hear it is due to my pioneer childhood associations.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users