Jump to content


Paris Opera Ballet Style


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts

Posted 28 March 2003 - 11:34 AM

What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for Paris Opera Ballet Style? Head, fingers, knees and toes, please. And for men as well as women.

#2 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,239 posts

Posted 29 March 2003 - 07:46 AM

I'll start with a few observations from an outsider. The first time I saw the company, I noticed several things -- mostly from the way they danced La Bayadere, because that's what they were doing for a week here that season -- about the company's style that impressed me as different from what I saw with ABT or NYCB, the two major companies I see the most. I'm not saying that these are unique to POB, but I think I can say they are part of the style.

One. The working foot in passé ALWAYS touches the opposite knee. Not a half-inch above, not excitedly swatting the calf, the knee.

Two. Dancers with bodies I'd considered "Romantic" -- tall, slim, linear, long legs, not "classically proportioned" -- like Elisabeth Patel were using their bodies "classically": squared rather than sloping shoulders, raised chest.

Three. In turns -- I loved this -- the dancers' arms were held in a circle. It made the dancing look very centered, self-referential.

Four. (Many people didn't like this; I did). The coldness and purity of the Shades scene. It wasn't spiritual; it was crystalline. There's a photograph of the Shades' legs (when the corps is standing at the side of the stage) that the company once used for publicity -- and it wasn't a lucky accident. It looks like one pair of legs refracted in 16 mirrors.

Five. Backs. This is where terminology becomes loaded. The back is different from the Russian back. If you don't like it, you'll say it's stiff; if you do, you'll say it's erect. There isn't the same bend, flexibility, that there is with Russian-trained dancers, and I think this is because Russian classicism is inflected with Russian folk dance.

Acting style. In the time I've been watching dance, I've never seen a company that can handle different styles as nimbly as POB -- yet they always remain themselves. The acting in Bayadere was very stylized, very grand, rather cold. The next week, in Petit's "Les Rendez-vous," many of the same dancers were detailed, passionate and fiery.

I hope we'll get some observations from people who actually know POB style :) but those are a few points to start.

#3 Estelle

Estelle

    Platinum Circle

  • Foreign Correspondent
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,706 posts

Posted 29 March 2003 - 03:36 PM

Thanks for all those explanations, Alexandra. Actually my problem is that, since I haven't seen that many other companies, it's really hard for me to distinguish what is typical of the POB style and what isn't...

#4 Hans

Hans

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,104 posts

Posted 01 April 2003 - 10:38 AM

One thing I notice from having taken a few classes from a Paris Opéra teacher is the emphasis on the legs and feet. The port de bras wasn't very elaborate (or logical), but positions were clean and clear. The footwork was very clear and light, and while port de bras wasn't used as sparely as at NYCB, it was definitely not used much. The positions of the hands were similar to Vaganova.

#5 silvy

silvy

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 485 posts

Posted 29 April 2003 - 01:02 PM

For me the main characteristics are:

1) use of feet in women: unique - panther-like, a joy to watch As a former teacher of mine said: "try to make your pointes cry (he was an admirer of the French school"

2) very feminine and aristocratic quality in women. You believe that they are direct descendants from Louis XIV.

3) very athletic (the men)

silvy

#6 BW

BW

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,048 posts

Posted 27 September 2003 - 03:02 PM

In some parts of the world their new seasons have already started - so it's time for a revival or two. :)

#7 artist

artist

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 177 posts

Posted 25 February 2007 - 12:58 PM

as stated already - feet, highly arched, as if speaking to you. and, high extension with very delicate bodies.

now was this being stressed upon before or after Nureyev came?

#8 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 25 February 2007 - 03:26 PM

I see it as Guillem's influence. She was, as far as I can tell, the POB prototype, and she came to prominence is roughly concurrent with RN's ADship.

"As if speaking to you" -- great image!

My first POB experience was during summer '73, with guest stars Makarova and Nureyev. What stood out to me then was POB's filigree finish, which was unmistakably French, even for someone who was just beginning to "see" ballet. An extra element of artifice, and not without its charm. It is far less pronounced now than then (as are many characteristics of the various national styles), but it came into vivid relief when seen against the Kirov-bred principals.

As we discovered through this board, Treefrog was there. Right, TF? :blink:


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):