Written record of Ballet
Posted 05 April 2003 - 04:19 AM
i would agree with someone up above who recommended collecting (only the very best of) the programmes offered - those with good background information, rather than lots of advertisements and photos.
i imagine it would be worth your while, to obtain and read cyril beaumont's few books titled 'The Ballet Called .......'. these exist for Giselle and for Swan Lake, but i don't know if there are any others. these come as close as possible to what you are asking for - but of course they are about 50 years old....nevertheless, you will probably find they are obtainable, if you search patiently...and/or contact dancebooks (woops - no longer 'in london') for a used copy.
Posted 05 April 2003 - 04:41 AM
the first comment is of course true - it is not the READING of the score that breaches copyright, but rather the RECREATING of the encoded material - which might follow from the reading. i thought we would all understand this.
I don't believe that reading a notation score would in any way undermine copyright or patent rights to the material recorded. Those who can are free to read whatever they can. It is only when the material so written is plagiarized that the creator's rights come into play.
this second quote refers to the '50 years beyond the death of the creator' rule. although benesh was created mid-20th century, as many as possible earlier works have been notated (e.g. swan lake, nutcracker, coppelia, ...whatever). therefore, this choreographic material is already well into the public domain, (although the specific PRODUCTIONS aren't - but let's leave THAT out, for now!). these scores exist.
As Benesh was only developed ca. 1955, we are still quite a way from most of the material passing into public domain, but at some time in the future it will. We will have to see then what becomes of the material. The possibility of automobile accidents and jaywalking has not restricted the opening of roads and streets.
there is quite a bit of (benesh) notated choreography from that 'pre-the 50 years' era, which IS readily available. for example, little booklets of notated solos from the classics, which have been notated quite simply, without too much of the detail which would mark them as belonging to a particular PRODUCTION. in other words - as 'pure' as possible...and therefore regarded as 'fair enough' to put out in the market place.
whether or not the benesh institute still even prints or sells these, i don't know - because so very few people are ABLE to read the stuff, that there really isn't much of a market. but they HAVE been made publicly available in the past.
finally, getting down to mel's last and (to me) most interesting point :
"The possibility of automobile accidents and jaywalking has not restricted the opening of roads and streets."
i'm not going to think too much about this analogy, as the mental picture just confuses me, i'm afraid. :confused: but the point he makes is a valid and significant one:
*we can all buy copies of plays (for example) written by living playwrights - and their copyright is not breached by the TEXT being available. putting it into performance is what breaches the copyright.*
am i right, here? .... i believe so, in your country, as well as mine.
in legal terms, it IS the same with a ballet score - and yet, the reins are held tightly by the powers that be, fearful of plagiarism...
...food for thought, i believe.
thanks for bringing up this point, mel.
Posted 05 April 2003 - 06:32 AM
Because of relatively recent developments in international copyright and patent agreements and treaties, the old "50-year" doctrine is about as dead as a doornail, though. Rights to a work extend not only to the creator (a new wrinkle, especially valuable to graphic artists), but to the recorder (the choreologist, in the case of ballets), the publisher, and to the archive/library to where the original material is retained. The result is a real mare's nest, and can result in someone trying to arrange all the strands of spaghetti on his plate into straight lines before material can be used. The only thing that everybody agrees upon is that if it were entirely put together before 1926, it's all public domain.:rolleyes:
Posted 05 April 2003 - 04:40 PM
FOR DANCE - in the UK and in australia, to the best of my knowledge, there are no rights to the storage venue. nor any to the publisher.
also, any rights to the actual 'heiroglyphs' written on the page (as opposed to the choreography) which go to the notator (choreologist), actually go to the company which employed him/her - NOT the individual person (of course this is assuming they were employed to notate, which is almost always the case).
there is also copyright in the PRODUCTION, including the stager's/director's interpretation, the sets, the costumes, presumably the lighting design, etc...
additionally, there is copyright in the actual notation (language) - but that's a whole OTHER vexed issue, which, i'm told by an australian arts lawyer, may in fact be a fantasy of the Benesh Institute....(that's another question which i find fascinating.)
all of the same points should apply, no matter what notation method is used, but it certainly would be interesting to have a laban expert on this board, to compare notes, occasionally.
sorry to have detoured this far, BilboB, but there is always a concern for accuracy of information on this board - that's one of the best things about it.
mel, i checked out that link, above, to your swan lake notes: quite an achievement - i'd never been aware of these before. bravo! these should serve BilboB well.
Posted 05 April 2003 - 05:35 PM
Thank you for the roses on the Swan Lake pages, there'll be more soon.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users